JULIO CESAR GARCIA DE ALENCAR
Índice h a partir de 2011
9
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
BAO, FOB - Docente
LIM/51 - Laboratório de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/51 - Laboratório de Emergências Clínicas, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
10 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 10
- Lung ultrasound score predicts outcomes in COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department(2021) ALENCAR, Julio Cesar Garcia de; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio Meirelles; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; RIBEIRO, Sabrina Correa da Costa; BUENO, Caue Gasparotto; CUNHA, Victor Paro da; LAZAR NETO, Felippe; BRANDAO NETO, Rodrigo Antonio; SOUZA, Heraldo PossoloBackground During the COVID-19 pandemic, creating tools to assess disease severity is one of the most important aspects of reducing the burden on emergency departments. Lung ultrasound has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases; however, there are few prospective studies demonstrating that lung ultrasound can predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that lung ultrasound score (LUS) at hospital admission could predict outcomes of COVID-19 patients. This is a prospective cohort study conducted from 14 March through 6 May 2020 in the emergency department (ED) of an urban, academic, level I trauma center. Patients aged 18 years and older and admitted to the ED with confirmed COVID-19 were considered eligible. Emergency physicians performed lung ultrasounds and calculated LUS, which was tested for correlation with outcomes. This protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee number 3.990.817 (CAAE: 30417520.0.0000.0068). Results The primary endpoint was death from any cause. The secondary endpoints were ICU admission and endotracheal intubation for respiratory failure. Among 180 patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were enrolled (mean age, 60 years; 105 male), the average LUS was 18.7 +/- 6.8. LUS correlated with findings from chest CT and could predict the estimated extent of parenchymal involvement (mean LUS with < 50% involvement on chest CT, 15 +/- 6.7 vs. 21 +/- 6.0 with > 50% involvement, p < 0.001), death (AUC 0.72, OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21; p < 0.001), endotracheal intubation (AUC 0.76, OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.26; p < 0.001), and ICU admission (AUC: 0.71, OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.21; p < 0.001). Conclusions In COVID-19 patients admitted in ED, LUS was a good predictor of death, ICU admission, and endotracheal intubation.
- Awake Prone Positioning in COVID-19 Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Exploratory Findings in a Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study(2020) PADRAO, Eduardo M. H.; VALENTE, Fernando S.; BESEN, Bruno A. M. P.; RAHHAL, Hassan; MESQUITA, Paula S.; DEALENCAR, Julio C. G.; DACOSTA, Millena G. P.; WANDERLEY, Annelise P. B.; EMERENCIANO, Debora L.; BORTOLETO, Felipe M.; FORTES, Julio C. L.; MARQUES, Bruno; DESOUZA, Stefany F. B.; MARCHINI, Julio F. M.; NETO, Rodrigo A. B.; DESOUZA, Heraldo P.Background Awake prone positioning has been widely used in patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure to avoid intubation despite limited evidence. Our objective was to evaluate if prone positioning is associated with a reduced intubation rate when compared to usual care. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study in the emergency department of a large quaternary hospital in Sao Paulo. We retrieved data from all admitted patients in need of oxygen supplementation (>3 L/min) and tachypnea (>24 ipm) from March 1 to April 30, 2020, excluding those who had any contraindication to the prone position or who had an immediate need for intubation. The primary endpoint was endotracheal intubation up to 15 days. Secondary outcomes included a 6-point clinical outcome ordinal scale, mechanical ventilation-free days, admission to the intensive care unit, and need of hemodialysis and of vasoactive drugs, all assessed at or up to 15 days. We analyzed unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates with Cox proportional hazards models, logistic regression, quantile regression, and sensitivity analyses using propensity score models. Results Of 925 suspected COVID-19 patients admitted off mechanical ventilation, 166 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria: 57 were exposed to prone positioning and 109 to usual care. In the intervention group, 33 (58%) were intubated versus 53 (49%) in the control group. We observed no difference in intubation rates in the univariate analysis (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.78 to 1.88, p = 0.39) nor in the adjusted analysis (hazard ratio = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.55 to 1.49, p = 0.69). Results were robust to the sensitivity analyses. Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusions Awake prone positioning was not associated with lower intubation rates. Caution is necessary before widespread adoption of this technique, pending results of clinical trials.
conferenceObject COVID-19 and H1N1 Pneumonia: Reanalysis and Comparison of Two Cohorts(2022) SORICE, E.; STERNLICHT, J.; SANTOS, L. B.; BRANDAO, R.; MARINO, L.; MARCHINI, J.; ALENCAR, J.; GOMEZ, L.; SOUZA, H.conferenceObject Lung Ultrasound Score Predicts Outcomes in Covid-19 Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department(2021) ALENCAR, J. C.; BRANDAO NETO, R. A.; MARINO, L. O.; RIBEIRO, S. Correa Da Costa; MARCHINI, J. F.; SOUZA, H. P.- Mortality and other outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease pneumonia admitted to the emergency department: A prospective observational Brazilian study(2021) BRANDAO NETO, Rodrigo A.; MARCHINI, Julio F.; MARINO, Lucas O.; ALENCAR, Julio C. G.; LAZAR NETO, Felippe; RIBEIRO, Sabrina; SALVETTI, Fernando V.; RAHHAL, Hassan; GOMEZ, Luz Marina Gomez; BUENO, Caue G.; FARIA, Carine C.; CUNHA, Victor P. da; PADRAO, Eduardo; VELASCO, Irineu T.; SOUZA, Heraldo Possolo deBackground The first cases of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Brazil were diagnosed in February 2020. Our Emergency Department (ED) was designated as a COVID-19 exclusive service. We report our first 500 confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Methods From 14 March to 16 May 2020, we enrolled all patients admitted to our ED that had a diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. Infection was confirmed via nasopharyngeal swabs or tracheal aspirate PCR. The outcomes included hospital discharge, invasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital death, among others. Results From 2219 patients received in the ED, we included 506 with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia. We found that 333 patients were discharged home (65.9%), 153 died (30.2%), and 20 (3.9%) remained in the hospital. A total of 300 patients (59.3%) required ICU admission, and 227 (44.9%) needed invasive ventilation. The multivariate analysis found age, number of comorbidities, extension of ground glass opacities on chest CT and troponin with a direct relationship with all-cause mortality, whereas dysgeusia, use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-ii receptor blocker and number of lymphocytes with an inverse relationship with all-cause mortality Conclusions This was a sample of severe patients with COVID-19, with 59.2% admitted to the ICU and 41.5% requiring mechanical ventilator support. We were able to ascertain the outcome in majority (96%) of patients. While the overall mortality was 30.2%, mortality for intubated patients was 55.9%. Multivariate analysis agreed with data found in other studies although the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-ii receptor blocker as a protective factor could be promising but would need further studies.
- Community-acquired pneumonia severity assessment tools in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a validation and clinical applicability study(2021) NETO, Felippe Lazar; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; TORRES, Antoni; CILLONIZ, Catia; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio Meirelles; ALENCAR, Julio Cesar Garcia de; PALOMEQUE, Andrea; ALBACAR, Nuria; BRANDAO NETO, Rodrigo Antonio; SOUZA, Heraldo Possolo; RANZANI, Otavio T.Objective: To externally validate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) tools on patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia from two distinct countries, and compare their performance with recently developed COVID-19 mortality risk stratification tools. Methods: We evaluated 11 risk stratification scores in a binational retrospective cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia in Sao Paulo and Barcelona: Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), CURB, CURB-65, qS0FA, Infectious Disease Society of America and American Thoracic Society Minor Criteria, REA-ICU, SCAP, SMART-COP, CALL, COVID GRAM and 4C. The primary and secondary outcomes were 30-day in-hospital mortality and 7-day intensive care unit (ICU) admission, respectively. We compared their predictive performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, calibration plots and decision curve analysis. Results: Of 1363 patients, the mean (SD) age was 61 (16) years. The 30-day in-hospital mortality rate was 24.6% (228/925) in Sao Paulo and 21.0% (92/438) in Barcelona. For in-hospital mortality, we found higher AUCs for PSI (0.79, 95% CI 0.77-0.82), 4C (0.78, 95% CI 0.75-0.81), COVID GRAM (0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.80) and CURB-65 (0.74, 95% CI 0.72-0.77). Results were similar for both countries. For the 1%-20% threshold range in decision curve analysis, PSI would avoid a higher number of unnecessary interventions, followed by the 4C score. All scores had poor performance (AUC <0.65) for 7-day ICU admission. Conclusions: Recent clinical COVID-19 assessment scores had comparable performance to standard pneumonia prognostic tools. Because it is expected that new scores outperform older ones during development, external validation studies are needed before recommending their use. (C) 2021 The Author(s).
- Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial With N-acetylcysteine for Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Caused by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)(2021) ALENCAR, Julio Cesar Garcia de; MOREIRA, Claudia de Lucena; MULLER, Alicia Dudy; CHAVES, Cleuber Esteves; FUKUHARA, Marina Akemi; SILVA, Elizabeth Aparecida da; MIYAMOTO, Maria de Fatima Silva; PINTO, Vanusa Barbosa; BUENO, Caue Gasparotto; LAZAR NETO, Felippe; GOMEZ, Luz Marina Gomez; MENEZES, Maria Clara Saad; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio Meirelles; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; BRANDAO NETO, Rodrigo Antonio; SOUZA, Heraldo PossoloBackground: A local increase in angiotensin 2 after inactivation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may induce a redox imbalance in alveolar epithelium cells, causing apoptosis, increased inflammation and, consequently, impaired gas exchange. We hypothesized that N-acetylcysteine (NAC) administration could restore this redox homeostasis and suppress unfavorable evolution in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center trial conducted at the Emergency Department of Hospital das Clinicas, Sao Paulo, Brazil, to determine whether NAC in high doses can avoid respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. We enrolled 135 patients with severe COVID-19 (confirmed or suspected), with an oxyhemoglobin saturation <94% or respiratory rate >24 breaths/minute. Patients were randomized to receive NAC 21 g (similar to 300 mg/kg) for 20 hours or dextrose 5%. The primary endpoint was the need for mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints were time of mechanical ventilation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), time in ICU, and mortality. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups, with no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, medicines taken, and disease severity. Also, groups were similar in laboratory tests and chest computed tomography scan findings. Sixteen patients (23.9%) in the placebo group received endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, compared with 14 patients (20.6%) in the NAC group (P = .675). No difference was observed in secondary endpoints. Conclusions: Administration of NAC in high doses did not affect the evolution of severe COVID-19.
- Lower peripheral blood Toll-like receptor 3 expression is associated with an unfavorable outcome in severe COVID-19 patients(2021) MENEZES, Maria Clara Saad; VEIGA, Alicia Dudy Muller; LIMA, Thais Martins de; ARIGA, Suely Kunimi Kubo; BARBEIRO, Hermes Vieira; MOREIRA, Claudia de Lucena; PINTO, Agnes Araujo Sardinha; BRANDAO, Rodrigo Antonio; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio; ALENCAR, Julio Cesar; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; GOMEZ, Luz Marina; CAMARA, Niels Olsen Saraiva; SOUZA, Heraldo P.The role of innate immunity in COVID-19 is not completely understood. Therefore, this study explored the impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the expression of Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) in peripheral blood cells and their correlated cytokines. Seventy-nine patients with severe COVID-19 on admission, according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification, were divided into two groups: patients who needed mechanical ventilation and/or deceased (SEVERE, n=50) and patients who used supplementary oxygen but not mechanical ventilation and survived (MILD, n=29); a control group (CONTROL, n=17) was also enrolled. In the peripheral blood, gene expression (mRNA) of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 3, 4, 7, 8, and 9, retinoic-acid inducible gene I (RIGI), NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), interferon alpha (IFN-alpha), interferon beta (IFN-beta), interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), interferon lambda (IFN-lambda), pro-interleukin(IL)-1 beta (pro-IL-1 beta), and IL-18 was determined on admission, between 5-9 days, and between 10-15 days. Circulating cytokines in plasma were also measured. When compared to the COVID-19 MILD group, the COVID-19 SEVERE group had lower expression of TLR3 and overexpression of TLR4.
- Endothelial injury in COVID-19 and septic patients(2022) HOKAMA, Larissa Tami; VEIGA, Alicia Dudy Muller; MENEZES, Maria Clara Saad; PINTO, Agnes Araujo Sardinha; LIMA, Thais Martins de; ARIGA, Suely Kunimi Kubo; BARBEIRO, Hermes Vieira; BARBEIRO, Denise Frediani; MOREIRA, Claudia de Lucena; STANZANI, Gabriela; BRANDAO, Rodrigo Antonio; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio; ALENCAR, Julio Cesar; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; GOMEZ, Luz Marina; SOUZA, Heraldo P.Systemic inflammatory response, as observed in sepsis and severe COVID-19, may lead to endothelial damage. Therefore, we aim to compare the extent of endothelial injury and its relationship to inflammation in both diseases. We included patients diagnosed with sepsis (SEPSIS group, n = 21), mild COVID-19 (MILD group, n = 31), and severe COVID-19 (SEVERE group, n = 24). Clinical and routine laboratory data were obtained, circulating cytokines (INF-gamma, TNF-alpha, and IL-10) and endothelial injury markers (E-Selectin, Tissue Factor (TF) and von Willebrand factor (vWF)) were measured. Compared to the SEPSIS group, patients with severe COVID-19 present similar clinical and laboratory data, except for lower circulating IL-10 and E-Selectin levels. Compared to the MILD group, patients in the SEVERE group showed higher levels of TNF-alpha, IL-10, and TF. There was no clear relationship between cytokines and endothelial injury markers among the three studied groups; however, in SEVERE COVID-19 patients, there is a positive relationship between INF-gamma with TF and a negative relationship between IL-10 and vWF. In conclusion, COVID-19 and septic patients have a similar pattern of cytokines and endothelial dysfunction markers. These findings highlight the importance of endothelium dysfunction in COVID-19 and suggest that endothelium should be better evaluated as a therapeutic target for the disease.
- First-attempt intubation success and complications in patients with COVID-19 undergoing emergency intubation(2020) ALENCAR, Julio Cesar Garcia de; MARQUES, Bruno; MARCHINI, Julio Flavio Meirelles; MARINO, Lucas Oliveira; RIBEIRO, Sabrina Correa da Costa; BUENO, Caue Gasparotto; CUNHA, Victor Paro da; LAZAR NETO, Felippe; VALENTE, Fernando Salvetti; RAHHAL, Hassan; PEREIRA, Juliana Batista Rodrigues; PADRAO, Eduardo Messias Hirano; WANDERLEY, Annelise Passos Bispos; COSTA, Millena Gomes Pinheiro; BRANDAO NETO, Rodrigo Antonio; SOUZA, Heraldo PossoloObjectivesTo evaluate the first-attempt success rates and complications of endotracheal intubation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients by emergency physicians. MethodsThis prospective observational study was conducted from March 24, 2020 through May 28, 2020 at the emergency department (ED) of an urban, academic trauma center. We enrolled patients consecutively admitted to the ED with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 submitted to endotracheal intubation. No patients were excluded. The primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success, defined as successful endotracheal tube placement with the first device passed (endotracheal tube) during the first laryngoscope insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes included the following complications: hypotension, hypoxemia, aspiration, and esophageal intubation. ResultsA total of 112 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were enrolled. Median age was 61 years and 61 patients (54%) were men. The primary outcome, first-attempt intubation success, was achieved in 82% of patients. Among the 20 patients who were not intubated on the first attempt, 75% were intubated on the second attempt and 20% on the third attempt; cricothyrotomy was performed in 1 patient. Forty-eight (42%) patients were hypotensive and required norepinephrine immediately post-intubation. Fifty-eight (52%) experienced peri-intubation hypoxemia, and 2 patients (2%) had cardiac arrest. There were no cases of failed intubation resulting in death up to 24 hours after the procedure. ConclusionEmergency physicians achieve high success rates when intubating COVID19 patients, although complications are frequent. However, these findings should be considered provisional until their generalizability is assessed in their institutions and setting.