ALEXANDRE MENDONCA MUNHOZ
Índice h a partir de 2011
15
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/04 - Laboratório de Microcirurgia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
8 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 8 de 8
- Usefulness of Radio Frequency Identification Device in Diagnosing Rotation of Motiva SmoothSilk Implants after Augmentation Mammoplasty(2019) MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca; CHALA, Luciano; MELO, Giselle Guedes de; MARQUES FILHO, Ary de Azevedo; TUCUNDUVA, Tatiana; GEMPERLI, RolfBreast implant displacement has been described as a significant risk following augmentation mammoplasty. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the method of choice for diagnosing implant complications, but it has its limits in assessing correct implant position and displacement. Motiva SmoothSilk/SilkSurface (R) Implants (MSS) are the first to incorporate a radio frequency identification device (RFID), which produces an imaging artifact in MRI sequences. Given the frequency of breast augmentation procedures and the recent US Food and Drug Administration prospective trial involving SS with RFID, further analysis of implant stability and diagnostic imaging methods to evaluate implant positioning is necessary. The objective of this study was to assess the use of MRI with this new RFID-containing implant as a new tool to assess correct implant positioning. The authors performed this technique in 5 patients (10 implants) undergoing primary breast augmentation or revision surgery with MSS implants (255-385 cc, mean = 325 cc). The average area and volume of the artifact were 15.7 cm(2) and 31.75 cm(3), respectively. All cases presented satisfactory results, with 1 case of implant displacement. Our clinical and radiological outcome demonstrated that RFID technology is a useful tool for correct visualization of the implant position and diagnosis of complications such as slight displacements or rotation. To our knowledge, this is the first RFID breast implant that has been objectively evaluated for MRI issues.
- Breast Implant Surfaces and Their Impact on Current Practices: Where We Are Now and Where Are We Going?(2019) MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca; CLEMENS, Mark W.; NAHABEDIAN, Maurice Y.Most commercially available breast implants feature some degree of elastomer surface modifications to increase surface roughness, in part because several clinical series have demonstrated positive outcomes from texturizing. However, the literature shows that textured implants support higher rates of bacterial growth, and there is a clear association between increased bacterial contamination and host response in vivo, such as capsular contracture. Furthermore, the infectious theory related to bacterial contamination has recently been described as a potential cause in the etiology of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Recent research has focused on the physiology of breast implant surfaces advances and how they interact with the body, creating new surface technologies which have the potential to affect all aspects of breast surgery. Understanding how surface properties affect inflammatory cell response will be essential in designing implants that can provide an esthetic solution while also minimizing long-term clinical complications. This special topic highlights the current knowledge on silicone implant surfaces, as well as innovations that have shaped and will continue to change the silicone breast implant industry in the future. It also provides an overview of the principal surfaces that exist and may find clinical applications in esthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. As additional advances emerge, objective tools will be required to evaluate the different surfaces available on the market, along with the long-term efficacy of new technologies.
- Response to ""Clarification About 'Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant'""(2019) SFORZA, Marcos; HAMMOND, Dennis C.; BOTTI, Giovanni; HEDEN, Per; QUIROS, Manuel Chacon; MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca; KINNEY, Brian M.; CORDUFF, Niamh
bookPart Reconstrução mamária(2019) OKADA, Alberto Yoshikazu; FONSECA, Alexandre Siqueira Franco; MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonça; ARRUDA, Eduardo Gustavo Pires de; MONTAG, Eduardo; GEMPERLI, Rolf- Serratus anterior muscle flap as a salvage procedure in exposed implant-based breast reconstruction(2019) MONTAG, Eduardo; OKADA, Alberto; ARRUDA, Eduardo G. P.; MUNHOZ, Alexandre M.; BUSNARDO, Fabio F.; GEMPERLI, RolfBACKGROUND: Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) is the most common approach to reconstruct mastectomy deffects. Infection following breast reconstruction can be devastating and lead to loss of the reconstruction due to the need of implant removal. The serratus anterior muscle flap is widely used during breast reconstruction to provide coverage of the implant/expander. METHODS: We present the application of the serratus anterior muscle flap to treat implant exposure after breast reconstruction. CASES PRESENTATION: Two patients who experienced implant exposure after breast reconstruction were successfully treated with partial capsulectomy, pocket irrigation and implant coverage with a serratus anterior muscle flap. RESULTS: No post operative complications have been observed while implant retention was achieved in both cases. CONCLUSIONS: The serratus anterior muscle flap is an option to treat implant exposure following breast reconstruction in selected cases. This flap could be used to prevent implant exposure in critical cases. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd.
- Influência do posicionamento do retalho linfonodal vascularizado na resposta ao tratamento cirúrgico do linfedema secundário ao câncer de mama.(2019) MONTAG, Eduardo; OKADA, Alberto Yoshikazu; ARRUDA, Eduardo Gustavo Pires; FONSECA, Alexandre Siqueira; BROMLEY, Miluska; MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonça; BUSNARDO, Fábio Freitas; GEMPERLI, RolfABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the initial therapeutic experience of transplantation of vascularized lymph nodes in patients with lymphedema of the upper limbs secondary to the treatment of breast cancer, and to verify if the positioning of the transplant influences the surgical result. Methods: we conducted a prospective, comparative test of two therapeutic modalities, with 24 patients with lymphedema of the upper limb after breast cancer treatment, classified as grades 2 and 3, according to the International Lymphedema Society. The two types of procedures performed were: 1) total breast reconstruction with - deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap associated with lymph node flap, in patients with no previous breast reconstruction or loss of previous reconstruction (axillary positioning); 2) isolated inguinal lymph node flap performed in patients with completed breast reconstruction or without the desire to perform the breast reconstruction (wrist positioning). Results: the reduction percentage of the affected limb volume was 20.1% (p=0.0370). The number of infectious episodes (cellulites) also decreased significantly, from 41% in the preoperative period to 12.5% in the postoperative one (p=0.004). There were no differences between the proximal and distal groups. Conclusion: the transplantation of lymph nodes positively affected the postoperative evolution of patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. We observed no differences in relation to flap positioning.
- Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant(2019) SFORZA, Marcos; HAMMOND, Dennis C.; BOTTI, Giovanni; HEDEN, Per; QUIROS, Manuel Chacon; MUNHOZ, Alexandre Mendonca; KINNEY, Brian M.; CORDUFF, NiamhBackground Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. Objectives This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. Methods A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. Results The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Conclusions This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients.
- A Simple and Low-cost Method of Sleeve to Insert Silicone Gel Breast Implants(2019) PANCZEL, Georg; MUNHOZ, Alexandre MendoncaContact between silicone implants and skin/breast parenchyma has been described as an agent of implant contamination and biofilm formation, resulting in implant complications. The no-touch technique was introduced to avoid implant contact and reduce skin/breast contamination. The authors propose an easily available sleeve option using a saline sterile plastic container that provides elastic and transparent protection for inserting silicone implants. These sterile containers can be easily converted into a sleeve by cutting off the narrow end of the container, which then easily fits into the small inframammary, periareolar, and transaxillary incisions. The authors have performed this technique in 10 patients (20 implants) undergoing primary breast augmentation or revision breast surgery, with microtexturized implants ranging in size from 255 to 500 ml (mean, 325 ml) and obtained satisfactory results with no cases of complications. Our clinical outcome shows that this new sleeve does not interact with the implant or the patient's skin and soft tissues and has the added advantage of low cost compared with similar available devices, but further randomized and controlled studies are required to corroborate this effect.