MONICA SANCHES YASSUDA

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
20
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
EACH, EACH - Docente
LIM/45 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Neurocirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 3 de 3
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Brazilian Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised in the Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer'S Disease and Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia
    (2022) AMARAL-CARVALHO, Viviane; LIMA-SILVA, Thais Bento; MARIANO, Luciano Inacio; SOUZA, Leonardo Cruz de; GUIMARAES, Henrique Cerqueira; BAHIA, Valeria Santoro; NITRINI, Ricardo; BARBOSA, Maira Tonidandel; YASSUDA, Monica Sanches; CARAMELLI, Paulo
    Introduction Alzheimer's disease (AD) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are frequent causes of dementia and, therefore, instruments for differential diagnosis between these two conditions are of great relevance. Objective To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) for differentiating AD from bvFTD in a Brazilian sample. Methods The ACE-R was administered to 102 patients who had been diagnosed with mild dementia due to probable AD, 37 with mild bvFTD and 161 cognitively healthy controls, matched according to age and education. Additionally, all subjects were assessed using the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. The performance of patients and controls was compared by using univariate analysis, and ROC curves were calculated to investigate the accuracy of ACE-R for differentiating AD from bvFTD and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from controls. The verbal fluency plus language to orientation plus name and address delayed recall memory (VLOM) ratio was also calculated. Results The optimum cutoff scores for ACE-R were <80 for AD, <79 for bvFTD, and <80 for dementia (AD + bvFTD), with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) (AUC) >0.85. For the differential diagnosis between AD and bvFTD, a VLOM ratio of 3.05 showed an AUC of 0.816 (Cohen's d = 1.151; p < .001), with 86.5% sensitivity, 71.4% specificity, 72.7% positive predictive value, and 85.7% negative predictive value. Conclusions The Brazilian ACE-R achieved a good diagnostic accuracy for differentiating AD from bvFTD patients and for differentiating AD and bvFTD from the controls in the present sample.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Cognitive Function Instrument
    (2022) STUDART-NETO, Adalberto; MORAES, Natália Cristina; SPERA, Raphael Ribeiro; MERLIN, Silvia Stahl; PARMERA, Jacy Bezerra; JALUUL, Omar; SANCHESYASSUDA, Mônica; BRUCKI, Sonia Maria Dozzi; NITRINI, Ricardo
    ABSTRACT. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is defined as a self-perception of a progressive cognitive impairment, which is not detected objectively through neuropsychological tests. The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study developed the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI) to evaluate individuals with SCD. The CFI consists of two versions, namely, a self-report and a partner report. Objective: This study aimed to translate CFI into Brazilian Portuguese, perform a cross-cultural adaptation, and validate the Brazilian version. Methods: The translation and transcultural adaptation process consisted of six stages, and the preliminary version was answered by a sample of individuals recruited among the patients’ caregivers from a cognitive neurology outpatient clinic. Finally, the final Brazilian version of the CFI was applied to a sample of nondemented older adults to validate the instrument, which was divided into with and without SCD, according to the answer “yes” for the question: “Do you feel like your memory is becoming worse?”. Results: The final version of CFI showed a high level of acceptability as an assessment tool in nondemented older adults. Participants with SCD had higher scores in the CFI self-report compared with those without complaints. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve of the CFI self-report was 0.865 (95% confidence interval 0.779–0.951), and the cutoff score of 2.0 was the one that best distinguished the SCD group from the control group, with a sensitivity of 73.3% and a specificity of 81.5%. Conclusions: CFI proved to be an instrument with good accuracy and easy applicability to identify older adults with SCD.
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Diagnóstico da demência frontotemporal: recomendações do Departamento Científico de Neurologia Cognitiva e do Envelhecimento da Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
    (2022) SOUZA, Leonardo Cruz de; HOSOGI, Mirna Lie; MACHADO, Thais Helena; CARTHERY-GOULART, Maria Teresa; YASSUDA, Mônica Sanches; SMID, Jerusa; BARBOSA, Breno José Alencar Pires; SCHILLING, Lucas Porcello; BALTHAZAR, Marcio Luiz Figueredo; FROTA, Norberto Anízio Ferreira; VALE, Francisco Assis Carvalho; CARAMELLI, Paulo; BERTOLUCCI, Paulo Henrique Ferreira; CHAVES, Márcia Lorena Fagundes; BRUCKI, Sonia Maria Dozzi; NITRINI, Ricardo; BAHIA, Valéria Santoro; TAKADA, Leonel Tadao
    ABSTRACT “Frontotemporal dementia” (FTD) is a clinical syndrome characterized by the focal involvement of the frontal and/or temporal lobes. FTD has three clinical phenotypes: the behavioral variant and two linguistic subtypes, namely, non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia (PPA-NF/A) and semantic PPA (PPA-S). FTD is the second most common cause of dementia in individuals under the age of 65 years. This article presents recommendations for the diagnosis of FTD in the Brazilian scenario, considering the three levels of complexity of the health system: primary health care, secondary and tertiary levels. Diagnostic guidelines are proposed, including cognitive testing, behavioral and language assessments, laboratory tests, and neuroimaging.