CARLO CAMARGO PASSEROTTI
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/55 - Laboratório de Urologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Líder
7 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 7 de 7
- Predicting Anatomical Urological Abnormalities in Children Who Present With Their First Urinary Tract Infection(2013) ZANETTA, Vitor C.; ROSMAN, Brian M.; ROWE, Courtney K.; BUONFIGLIO, Helena B.; PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; YU, Richard N.; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Objectives. Classically, presence of fever 38.0 degrees C is used to distinguish pyelonephritis from cystitis. We analyzed whether this is an appropriate marker to initiate further workup and whether temperature is correlated with urological abnormalities and further surgical or pharmacological intervention. Methods. Children who presented for their first workup of urinary tract infection between October 1, 2008, and September 30, 2009 were retrospectively selected from our institution. Demographics and clinical details were correlated with the diagnosis of urological abnormalities and requirement for intervention. Results. Age was the most important variable to predict urological abnormalities. The temperature value of 38.3 degrees C maximized the balance between sensitivity (90%) and specificity (46%) for predicting the need to intervene and the presence of anatomical urological abnormalities. Conclusion. Young age (2 years) and temperature are the best factors to predict further intervention and urological abnormalities, with a temperature value of 38.3 degrees C being a better predictive value than the currently used 38.0 degrees C.
- Comparison of the learning curves and frustration level in performing laparoscopic and robotic training skills by experts and novices(2015) PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; FRANCO, Felipe; BISSOLI, Julio C. C.; TISEO, Bruno; OLIVEIRA, Caio M.; BUCHALLA, Carlos A. O.; INOUE, Gustavo N. C.; SENCAN, Arzu; SENCAN, Aydin; PARDO, Rogerio Ruscitto do; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Robotic assistance may provide for distinct technical advantages over conventional laparoscopic technique. The goals of this study were (1) to objectively evaluate the difference in the learning curves by novice and expert surgeons in performing fundamental laparoscopic skills using conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) and (2) to evaluate the surgeons' frustration level in performing these tasks. Twelve experienced and 31 novices in laparoscopy were prospectively evaluated in performing three standardized laparoscopic tasks in five consecutive, weekly training sessions. Analysis of the learning curves was based on the magnitude, rate, and quickness in performance improvement. The participant's frustration and mood were also evaluated during and after every session. For the novice participants, RALS allowed for shorter time to task completion and greater accuracy. However, significant and rapid improvement in performance as measured by magnitude, rate, and quickness at each session was also seen with CLS. For the experienced surgeons, RALS only provided a slight improvement in performance. For all participants, the use of RALS was associated with less number of sessions in which they felt frustrated, less number of frustration episodes during a session, lower frustration score during and after the session, and higher good mood score. The advantages of RALS may be of most benefit when doing more complex tasks and by less experienced surgeons. RALS should not be used as a replacement for CLS but rather in specific situations in which it has the greatest advantages.
- Evaluation of a novel gel-based ureteral stent with biofilm-resistant characteristics(2014) ROSMAN, Brian M.; BARBOSA, Joao A. B. A.; PASSEROTTI, Carlo P.; CENDRON, Marc; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Current ureteral stents, while effective at maintaining a ureteral lumen, provide a substrate for bacterial growth. This propensity for biofilm formation may be a nidus for bacterial growth leading to infection and a reason for early removal of a stent before it is clinically indicated. A newly devised stent, composed of a highly hydrated, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile polymer, is believed to have bacterial resistant properties. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biofilm growth and bacterial resistant properties of this novel stent. Multiple 1 cm sections of the pAguaMedicina (TM) Pediatric Ureteral Stent (pAMS) (Q Urological, Natick, MA) and the conventional polymer stent (SS) (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) were incubated for 3 days in the 3 different growth media. Afterward, J96 human pathogenic Escherichia coli was added. At 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days following bacterial inoculation, the stent segments were washed, sonicated, and analyzed for bacterial growth. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging was performed to assess biofilm formation. pAMS demonstrated significant reductions (43-71 %) in bacterial counts when compared to standard stents in all conditions tested. SEM imaging demonstrated biofilm formation on both types of stents in all media, with a relative reduction in apparent cell debris and bacteria on the pAMS. In this study, the gel-based stent shows a demonstrable reduction in bacterial counts and biofilm formation. The use of the pAMS may reduce the risk of infection associated with stent usage.
- Variations in Management of Mild Prenatal Hydronephrosis Among Maternal-Fetal Medicine Obstetricians, and Pediatric Urologists and Radiologists(2012) ZANETTA, Vitor C.; ROSMAN, Brian M.; BROMLEY, Bryan; SHIPP, Thomas D.; CHOW, Jeanne S.; CAMPBELL, Jeffrey B.; HERNDON, C. D. Anthony; PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; CENDRON, Marc; RETIK, Alan B.; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Purpose: There are no current guidelines for diagnosing and managing mild prenatal hydronephrosis. Variations in physician approach make it difficult to analyze outcomes and establish optimal management. We determined the variability of diagnostic approach and management regarding prenatal hydronephrosis among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists. Materials and Methods: Online surveys were sent to mailing lists for national societies for each specialty. Participants were surveyed regarding criteria for diagnosing mild prenatal hydronephrosis and recommendations for postnatal management, including use of antibiotic prophylaxis, followup scheduling and type of followup imaging. Results: A total of 308 maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, 126 pediatric urologists and 112 pediatric radiologists responded. Pediatric urologists and radiologists were divided between Society for Fetal Urology criteria and use of anteroposterior pelvic diameter for diagnosis, while maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians preferred using the latter. For postnatal evaluation radiologists preferred using personal criteria, while urologists preferred using anteroposterior pelvic diameter or Society for Fetal Urology grading system. There was wide variation in the use of antibiotic prophylaxis among pediatric urologists. Regarding the use of voiding cystourethrography/radionuclide cystography in patients with prenatal hydronephrosis, neither urologists nor radiologists were consistent in their recommendations. Finally, there was no agreement on length of followup for mild prenatal hydronephrosis. Conclusions: We observed a lack of uniformity regarding grading criteria in diagnosing hydronephrosis prenatally and postnatally among maternal-fetal medicine obstetricians, pediatric urologists and pediatric radiologists. There was also a lack of agreement on the management of mild intermittent prenatal hydronephrosis, resulting in these cases being managed inconsistently. A unified set of guidelines for diagnosis, evaluation and management of mild intermittent prenatal hydronephrosis would allow more effective evaluation of outcomes.
- Development and Initial Validation of a Scoring System to Diagnose Testicular Torsion in Children(2013) BARBOSA, Joao A.; TISEO, Bruno Camargo; BARAYAN, Ghassan A.; ROSMAN, Brian M.; TORRICELLI, Fabio Cesar Miranda; PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; SROUGI, Miguel; RETIK, Alan B.; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Purpose: Testicular torsion is a surgical emergency requiring prompt intervention. Although clinical diagnosis is recommended, scrotal ultrasound is frequently ordered, delaying treatment. We created a scoring system to diagnose testicular torsion, decreasing the indication for ultrasound. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 338 patients with acute scrotum, of whom 51 had testicular torsion. Physical examination was performed by a urologist, and all patients underwent scrotal ultrasound. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed, and a scoring system for risk stratification of torsion was created. Retrospective validation was performed with 2 independent data sets. Results: The scoring system consisted of testicular swelling (2 points), hard testicle (2), absent cremasteric reflex (1), nausea/vomiting (1) and high riding testis (1). Cutoffs for low and high risk were 2 and 5 points, respectively. Ultrasound would be indicated only for the intermediate risk group. In the prospective data set 69% of patients had low, 19% intermediate and 11.5% high risk. Negative and positive predictive values were 100% for cutoffs of 2 and 5, respectively (specificity 81%, sensitivity 76%). Retrospective validation in 1 data set showed 66% of patients at low, 16% intermediate and 17% high risk. Negative and positive predictive values for cutoffs of 2 and 5 were 100% (specificity 97%, sensitivity 54%). The second retrospective data set included only torsion cases, none of which was misdiagnosed by the scoring system. Conclusions: This scoring system can potentially diagnose or rule out testicular torsion in 80% of cases, with high positive and negative predictive values for selected cutoffs. Ultrasound orders would be decreased to 20% of acute scrotum cases. Prospective validation of this scoring system is necessary.
- Validation of the pediatric surgical risk assessment scoring system(2013) WOODA, Guilherme; BARAYAN, Ghassan; SANCHEZ, Daniela C. J.; INOUE, Gustavo N. C.; BUCHALLA, Carlos A. O.; ROSSINI, Guilherme A.; TREVISANI, Lorenzo F. M.; PRADO, Rogerio Ruscitto do; PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Background: Within the adult population, there exist numerous validated risk stratification tools aimed at predicting postoperative outcomes using preoperative and intraoperative parameters. However, similar tools for the pediatric population are scarce. We previously developed and reported on a scoring system to predict postoperative complications in children undergoing surgery at Boston Children's Hospital. The objective of this study was to validate our scoring system to determine its effectiveness in identifying children at risk for major complications or death within 30 days following surgery. Study Design: A computer program randomly selected 2015 out of 11,734 patients who underwent surgery at our institution in 2009. The severity of the complications was graded based on the Clavien classification system, with major complications being a grade III or higher. The Preoperative Complication Score (PCS) and the Overall Complication Score (OCS) were calculated for all patients, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for each scoring system. Results: The overall incidence of major complications was 3.9% (79 patients). Proportionally, cardiac surgery had the highest percentage of major complications (20% of the performed surgeries). Both PCS and OCS demonstrated excellent correlation with postoperative outcomes with c-statistic values of 0.740 (CI 0.682-0.800, p < 0.001) and 0.767 (CI 0.712-0.822, p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusions: We determined that both the PCS and OCS are effective in identifying children at risk for major complications and death following surgery. Further studies will be needed to determine if these scoring systems are applicable to children undergoing surgery at other institutions and if the use of the scoring systems would result in improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs.
- Parent and Patient Perceptions of Robotic vs Open Urological Surgery Scars in Children(2013) BARBOSA, Joao A. B. A.; BARAYAN, Ghassan; GRIDLEY, Chad M.; SANCHEZ, Daniela C. J.; PASSEROTTI, Carlo C.; HOUCK, Constance S.; NGUYEN, Hiep T.Purpose: Cumulative evidence shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is safe and at least as efficacious as open surgery for several pediatric urological procedures. Scars resulting from robotic surgery are often assumed to have a cosmetic advantage. However, no study has clearly demonstrated that parents and patients consistently prefer such scars. Materials and Methods: We developed 3 distinct surveys consisting of photographs and diagrams of scars resulting from open and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for ureteral reimplantation, pyeloplasty and bladder augmentation. Surveys were distributed to parents of patients being evaluated for 1 of the 3 procedures. The surveys evaluated information such as scar preference, reason for preference and demographics. Patients older than 7 years also completed surveys. Results: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical scars were preferred by parents for all procedures studied (85% for ureteral reimplant, 63% for pyeloplasty and 93% for bladder augmentation). Patients also preferred the robotic scars (76%, 62% and 91%, respectively). Patients and parents did not differ significantly in scar preference or in rating of factors affecting decision. Scar size was important or very important to 80% of parents for reimplant, 83% for pyeloplasty and 86% for bladder augmentation. However, the majority of parents would ultimately base their choice of surgical approach on clinical efficacy rather than scar preference. Conclusions: Parents and patients prefer robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical scars to open surgical scars for pediatric ureteral reimplantation, pyeloplasty and bladder augmentation. Scar appearance is an important influence on the decisions of parents and patients, and should be discussed when surgical treatment is presented.