IGOR BRAGA RIBEIRO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/35 - Laboratório de Nutrição e Cirurgia Metabólica do Aparelho Digestivo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
106 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 106
- Managing adverse events after endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of the biliary tract and pancreatic fluid collections: Narrative review (with video)(2022) FUNARI, Mateus Pereira; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; MATUGUMA, Sergio Eiji; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided therapeutic procedures have become increasingly common in clinical practice. The development of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration cytology led to the concept of interventional EUS. However, it carries a considerable risk of adverse events (AEs), which occur in approximately 23% of the procedures performed for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and 2.5-37.0% of those performed for drainage of the biliary tract. Although the vast majority of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage are mild, a deep understanding of such events is necessary for their appropriate management. Because EUS-guided drainage is a novel procedure, there have been few studies of the topic. To our knowledge, this is the first narrative review that focuses on the management and resolution of AEs occurring after EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections or the biliary tract. We also include an explanatory video.
- Perspectives toward minimizing the adverse events of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty(2020) MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BADURDEEN, Dilhana S.; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; LEITE, Eduardo Filipe Marques Silva Dantas; THOMPSON, Christopher C.; KUMBHARI, VivekEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) transforms the saccular stomach into a tubular structure along the lesser curvature, thereby reducing gastric functional volume.(1-4) Current medical literature demonstrates that ESG achieves greater than 25% excess weight loss at 12 months with a less than 5% rate of severe adverse events (AEs), which is considered satisfactory according to the Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable endoscopic Innovations document created by a task force assembled by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.(5) Despite widespread adoption of the procedure,(6-8) no peer-reviewed resource exists to guide the physician on how to optimally perform the procedure. The aim of this article is to help physicians currently performing or those contemplating performing ESG by providing technical in-sights to facilitate durable tubularization of the stomach while simultaneously minimizing the rate of AEs.
- Acute esophageal necrosis (black esophagus) with active upper gastrointestinal bleeding: What to do?(2021) RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; LUZ, Gustavo de Oliveira; SOUZA, Gabriel Mayo Vieira de; BOGHOSSIAN, Mateus Bond; MONTE JUNIOR, Epifanio Silvino do; SANTOS, Marcos Eduardo Lera dos; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
- The Effectiveness and Safety of the Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner (DJBL) for the Management of Obesity and Glycaemic Control: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials(2023) YVAMOTO, Erika Yuki; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; PROENCA, Igor Mendonca; MONTE JUNIOR, Epifanio Silvino do; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; RIBAS, Pedro Henrique Boraschi Vieira; HEMERLY, Matheus Candido; OLIVEIRA, Victor Lira de; SANCHEZ-LUNA, Sergio A.; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deIntroduction The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is a less-invasive treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods This is a systematic review and meta-analysis including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing DJBL versus sham or pharmacotherapies aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DJBL. Results Ten RCTs (681 patients) were included. The DJBL group showed superior excess weight loss (+ 11.4% [+ 7.75 to + 15.03%], p < 0.00001) and higher decrease in HbA1c compared to the control group (- 2.73 +/- 0.5 vs. - 1.73 +/- 0.4, p = 0.0001). Severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 19.7%. Conclusion The DJBL did not reach the ASGE/ASMBS thresholds for the treatment of obesity. However, it is important to state that many SAEs were not really severe. Therefore, we believe this therapy plays an important role in the management obesity and T2DM.
- Endoscopic Biliary Darinage (EBD) versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD) for biliary drainage in patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA): A systematic review and meta-analysis(2023) MOLL, Caroline Flaksbaum; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; PROENCA, Igor Mendoca; MONTE JUNIOR, Epifanio Silvino do; SANCHEZ-LUNA, Sergio A.; MERCHAN, Maria Fernanda Shinin; INTRIAGO, Josselyn Mariana Vera; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deBiliary drainage for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (PCCA) can be performed either by endoscopic retrograde chol-angiopancreatography or Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage (PTBD). To date there is no consensus about which method is preferred. Taking that into account, the aim of this study is to compare Endoscopic Biliary Drainage (EBD) versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma through a systematic review and metanalysis. A comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases was per-formed. Evaluated outcomes included technical success, clinical success, post drainage complications (cholangitis, pancreatitis, bleeding, and major complications), crossover, hospital length stay, and seeding metastases. Data extracted from the studies were used to calculate Mean Differences (MD). Seventeen studies were included, with a total of 2284 patients (EBD = 1239, PTBD = 1045). Considering resectable PCCA, the PTBD group demon-strated lower rates of crossover (RD = 0.29; 95% CI 0.07-0.51; p = 0.009 I2 = 90%), post-drainage complica-tions (RD = 0.20; 95% CI 0.06-0.33; p < 0.0001; I2 = 78%), and post-drainage pancreatitis (RD = 0.10; 95% CI 0.05-0.16; p < 0.0001; I2 = 64%). The EBD group presented reduced length of hospital stay (RD =-2.89; 95% CI-3.35 --2,43;p < 0.00001; I2 = 42%). Considering palliative PCCA, the PTBD group demonstrated a higher clini-cal success (RD =-0.19; 95% CI-0.27 --0.11;p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and less post-drainage cholangitis (RD = 0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.15; p = 0.02; I2 = 48%) when compared to the EBD group. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding: technical success, post-drainage bleeding, major post-drainage compli-cations, and seeding metastases.
- EFFICACY OF ENDOSCOPIC TOPICAL MITOMYCIN C APPLICATION IN CAUSTIC ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS(2021) FLOR, Marcelo Mochate; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; DE MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux; MARQUES, Sérgio Barbosa; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; DE MOURA, Eduardo Guimarães HourneauxABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Caustic ingestion and development of esophageal strictures are recognized major public health problems in childhood. Different therapeutic methods have been proposed in the management of such strictures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and risk of endoscopic topical application of mitomycin C in the treatment of caustic esophageal strictures. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The outcomes evaluated were dysphagia resolution rate, number of dilations performed in resolved cases, and the number of dilations performed in all patients. RESULTS: Three randomized clinical trials were included for final analysis with a total of 190 patients. Topical mitomycin C application group showed a significant increase in dysphagia resolution rate, corresponding to a 42% higher dysphagia resolution as compared to endoscopic dilation alone, with statistical significance between the two groups (RD: 0.42 - [CI: 0.29-0.56]; P-value <0.00001). The mean number of dilations performed in resolved cases were significantly less in the topical mitomycin C application group, compared to endoscopic dilations alone, with statistical significance between the two groups (MD: 2.84 [CI: 1.98-3.69]; P-value <0.00001). When comparing the number of dilations in all patients, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (MD: 1.46 [CI: -1.53-4.44]; P-value =0.34). CONCLUSION: Application of topical mitomycin C with endoscopic dilations in caustic esophageal strictures was more effective in dysphagia resolution than endoscopic therapy alone in the pediatric population. Moreover, topical mitomycin C application also reduced the number of dilation sessions needed to alleviate dysphagia without rising morbidity.
- Propofolvsmidazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(2020) GUACHO, John Alexander Lata; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; PONTE NETO, Alberto Machado da; SINGH, Shailendra; TUCCI, Marina Gammaro Baldavira; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deBACKGROUND Patients with cirrhosis frequently require sedation for elective endoscopic procedures. Several sedation protocols are available, but choosing an appropriate sedative in patients with cirrhosis is challenging. AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare propofol and midazolam for sedation in patients with cirrhosis during elective endoscopic procedures in an attempt to understand the best approach. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Central Cochrane, LILACS databases. Only randomized control trials (RCTs) were included. The outcomes studied were procedure time, recovery time, discharge time, and adverse events (bradycardia, hypotension, and hypoxemia). The risk of bias assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2). Quality of evidence was evaluated by GRADEpro. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager. RESULTS The search yielded 3,576 records. Out of these, 8 RCTs with a total of 596 patients (302 in the propofol group and 294 in the midazolam group) were included for the final analysis. Procedure time was similar between midazolam and propofol groups (MD: 0.25, 95%CI: -0.64 to 1.13,P= 0.59). Recovery time (MD: -8.19, 95%CI: -10.59 to -5.79,P< 0.00001). and discharge time were significantly less in the propofol group (MD: -12.98, 95%CI: -18.46 to -7.50,P< 0.00001). Adverse events were similar in both groups (RD: 0.02, 95%CI: 0-0.04,P= 0.58). Moreover, no significant difference was found for bradycardia (RD: 0.03, 95%CI: -0.01 to 0.07,P= 0.16), hypotension (RD: 0.03, 95%CI: -0.01 to 0.07,P= 0.17), and hypoxemia (RD: 0.00, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.04,P= 0.93). Five studies had low risk of bias, two demonstrated some concerns, and one presented high risk. The quality of the evidence was very low for procedure time, recovery time, and adverse events; while low for discharge time. CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs show that propofol has shorter recovery and patient discharge time as compared to midazolam with a similar rate of adverse events. These results suggest that propofol should be the preferred agent for sedation in patients with cirrhosis.
- Is Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Still Associated With Higher Rates of Pancreatitis? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis(2020) MATSUBAYASHI, Carolina Ogawa; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BRUNALDI, Vitor Ottoboni; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; HATHORN, Kelly E.; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (EPBD), endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), and the combination of large balloon dilation and ES (ES + EPLBD) in the treatment of common bile duct stones, with a special focus on postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). Individualized search strategies were developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated at least one of the following outcomes: PEP, complete stone removal in the first ERCP, need for mechanical lithotripsy, recurrence of common bile duct stones, bleeding, and cholangitis. Twenty-five RCTs were selected for analysis. Pancreatitis rates were higher for EPBD than for ES (P = 0.003), as were severe pancreatitis rates (P = 0.04). However, in the 10-mm or greater balloon subgroup analysis, this difference was not shown (P = 0.82). Rates of PEP were higher in the subgroup of non-Asian subjects (P = 0.02), and the results were not robust when RCTs that used endoscopic nasobiliary drainage were omitted. The incidence of pancreatitis was comparable between EPLBD and ES + EPLBD. All 3 approaches were equally efficacious. Nevertheless, the results should be interpreted with caution, because pancreatitis is a multifactorial pathology, and RCTs can have limited generalizability.
- Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration vs fine needle biopsy in solid lesions: A multi-center analysis(2021) MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux; MCCARTY, Thomas R.; JIRAPINYO, Pichamol; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; FARIAS, Galileu Ferreira Ayala; MADRUGA-NETO, Antonio Coutinho; RYOU, Marvin; THOMPSON, Christopher C.BACKGROUND While endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is considered a preferred technique for tissue sampling for solid lesions, fine needle biopsy (FNB) has recently been developed. AIM To compare the accuracy of FNB vs FNA in determining the diagnosis of solid lesions. METHODS A retrospective, multi-center study of EUS-guided tissue sampling using FNA vs FNB needles. Measured outcomes included diagnostic test characteristics (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy), use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed by type of lesion and diagnostic yield with or without ROSE. A multivariable logistic regression was also performed. RESULTS A total of 1168 patients with solid lesions (n = 468 FNA; n = 700 FNB) underwent EUS-guided sampling. Mean age was 65.02 +/- 12.13 years. Overall, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were superior for FNB vs FNA (84.70% vs 74.53%; 99.29% vs 96.62%; and 87.62% vs 81.55%, respectively; P < 0.001). On subgroup analyses, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FNB alone were similar to FNA + ROSE [(81.66% vs 86.45%; P = 0.142), (100% vs 100%; P = 1.00) and (88.40% vs 85.43%; P = 0.320]. There were no difference in diagnostic yield of FNB alone vs FNB + ROSE (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed no significant predictor for better accuracy. On subgroup analyses, FNB was superior to FNA for non-pancreatic lesions; however, there was no difference between the techniques among pancreatic lesions. One adverse event was reported in each group. CONCLUSION FNB is superior to FNA with equivalent diagnostic test characteristics compared to FNA + ROSE in the diagnosis of non-pancreatic solid lesions. Our results suggest that EUS-FNB may eliminate the need of ROSE and should be employed as a first-line method in the diagnosis of solid lesions.
- Sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol before elective colonoscopy in outpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis(2018) ROCHA, Rodrigo Silva de Paula; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; BERNARDO, Wanderley Marques; MINATA, Mauricio Kazuyoshi; MORITA, Flavio Hiroshi Ananias; AQUINO, Julio Cesar Martins; BABA, Elisa Ryoka; MIYAJIMA, Nelson Tomio; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux deAIM To determine the best option for bowel preparation [sodium picosulphate or polyethylene glycol (PEG)] for elective colonoscopy in adult outpatients. METHODS A systematic review of the literature following the PRISMA guidelines was performed using Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, Central, Cinahl and Lilacs. No restrictions were placed for country, year of publication or language. The last search in the literature was performed on November 20th, 2017. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included. The subjects included were adult outpatients who underwent bowel cleansing for elective colonoscopy. The included studies compared sodium picosulphate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and PEG for bowel preparation. Exclusion criteria were the inclusion of inpatients or groups with specific conditions, failure to mention patient status (outpatient or inpatient) or dietary restrictions, and permission to have unrestricted diet on the day prior to the exam. Primary outcomes were bowel cleaning success and/or tolerability of colon preparation. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, polyp and adenoma detection rates. Data on intention-totreat were extracted by two independent authors and risk of bias assessed through the Jadad scale. Funnel plots, Egger's test, Higgins' test (I2) and sensitivity analyses were used to assess reporting bias and heterogeneity. The meta-analysis was performed by computing risk difference (RD) using Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method with fixed-effects (FE) and random-effects (RE) models. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) version 6.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration) was the software chosen to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS 662 records were identified but only 16 trials with 6200 subjects were included for the meta-analysis. High heterogeneity among studies was found and sensitivity analysis was needed and performed to interpret data. In the pooled analysis, SPMC was better for bowel cleaning [MH FE, RD 0.03, IC (0.01, 0.05), P = 0.003, I-2 = 33%, NNT 34], for tolerability [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.03, 0.13), P = 0.002, I-2 = 88%, NNT 13] and for adverse events [MH RE, RD 0.13, IC (0.05, 0.22), P = 0.002, I-2 = 88%, NNT 7]. There was no difference in regard to polyp and adenoma detection rates. Additional analyses were made by subgroups (type of regimen, volume of PEG solution and dietary recommendations). SPMC demonstrated better tolerability levels when compared to PEG in the following subgroups: ""day-before preparation"" [MH FE, RD 0.17, IC (0.13, 0.21), P < 0.0001, I-2 = 0%, NNT 6], "" preparation in accordance with time interval for colonoscopy"" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.15), P = 0.02, I-2 = 54%, NNT 13], when compared to ""high-volume PEG solutions"" [MH RE, RD 0.08, IC (0.01, 0.14), I-2 = 89%, P = 0.02, NNT 13] and in the subgroup "" liquid diet on day before"" [MH RE, RD 0.14, IC (0.06,0.22), P = 0.0006, I-2 = 81%, NNT 8]. SPMC was also found to cause fewer adverse events than PEG in the "" high-volume PEG solutions"" [MH RE, RD -0.18, IC (-0.30, -0.07), P = 0.002, I-2 = 79%, NNT 6] and PEG in the "" low-residue diet"" subgroup [MH RE, RD -0.17, IC (-0.27, 0.07), P = 0.0008, I-2 = 86%, NNT 6]. CONCLUSION SPMC seems to be better than PEG for bowel preparation, with a similar bowel cleaning success rate, better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse events.