IGOR BRAGA RIBEIRO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
16
Lattes
ResearcherID
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
LIM/35 - Laboratório de Nutrição e Cirurgia Metabólica do Aparelho Digestivo, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Mostrar mais
Limpar filtros

Configurações

Colaboração internacional: Peru ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
  • article 1 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Insufflation of Carbon Dioxide versus Air During Colonoscopy Among Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    (2021) GUACHO, John Alexander Lata; MOURA, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de; RIBEIRO, Igor Braga; MOURA, Bruna Furia Buzetti Hourneaux de; GALLEGOS, Megui Marilia Mansilla; MCCARTY, Thomas; TOMA, Ricardo Katsuya; MOURA, Eduardo Guimaraes Hourneaux de
    Background/Aims: Carbon dioxide is increasingly used in insufflation during colonoscopy in adult patients; however, air insufflation remains the primary practice among pediatric gastroenterologists. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate insufflation using CO2 versus air in colonoscopies in pediatric patients. Methods: Individualized search strategies were performed using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and LILACS databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Cochrane working methodology. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were selected for the present meta-analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated for outcomes including procedure time and abdominal pain immediately and 24 hours post-procedure. Results: The initial search yielded 644 records, of which five RCTs with a total of 358 patients (CO2: n=178 versus air: n=180) were included in the final analysis. The procedure time was not different between the CO2 and air insufflation groups (mean difference, 10.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.55 to 24.22; p=0.11). Abdominal pain immediately post-procedure was significantly lower in the CO2 group (risk difference [RD], -0.15; 95% CI; -0.26 to -0.03; p=0.01) while abdominal pain at 24 hours post-procedure was similar (RD, -0.05; 95% CI; -0.11 to 0.01; p=0.11). Conclusions: Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis of RCT data, CO2 insufflation reduced abdominal pain immediately following the procedure, while pain was similar at 24 hours post-procedure. These results su est that CO2 is a preferred insufflation technique when performing colonoscopy in pediatric patients.