BRENO DE ALENCAR ARARIPE FALCAO

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
5
Lattes
ResearcherID
ORCID
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Indexador: SciELO ×

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
  • article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Remoção Precoce do Introdutor Arterial Após Intervenção Coronária Percutânea por Via Femoral: Estudo de Segurança e Eficácia
    (2014) ZAGO, Gabriel; TRENTIN, Fabio; PRADO JR., Guy F. A.; SPADARO, Andre Gasparini; SILVA, Expedito Eustáquio Ribeiro da; CAMPOS, Carlos Magalhães; PERIN, Marco Antonio; FALCÃO, Breno de Alencar Araripe; ESTEVES-FILHO, Antonio; KAJITA, Luiz Junya; GAMA, Marcus Nogueira da; MARCHIORI, Gilberto; HORTA, Pedro Eduardo; TAKIMURA, Celso Kiyochi; MARIANI JR., Jose; GALON, Micheli Zanotti; SOARES, Paulo Rogerio; ZALC, Silvio; KALIL-FILHO, Roberto; LEMOS NETO, Pedro Alves
    Introduction: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of protamine administration, guided by activated clotting time, for the immediate femoral arterial sheath removal in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with unfractionated heparin in order to propose an algorithm for clinical practice. Methods: Prospective study with consecutive patients with stable angina or low-to-moderate risk acute coronary syndrome. We compared patients with an early removal of the arterial sheath to those whose sheath removal was based on a standard protocol. Results: The early removal group (n = 149) had lower access manipulation time than the conventional group (58.3 ± 21.4 minutes vs. 355.0 ± 62.9 minutes; p < 0.01), mainly due to a reduced time to sheath removal (42.3 ± 21.1 minutes vs. 338.6 ± 61.5 minutes; p < 0.01), with no impact on the duration of femoral compression (16.0 ± 3.6 minutes vs. 16.4 ± 5.1 minutes; p = 0.49). There was no stent thrombosis during hospitalization and no significant differences in the incidence of major vascular or bleeding events. The incidence of other bleeding events leading to a prolonged in-hospital length of stay was lower in the early removal group (1.3% vs. 5.1%; p = 0.05). Conclusions: The selective use of an approach for immediate femoral sheath removal, based on activated clotting time guidance and protamine administration, is a safe and effective option in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention by femoral access.
  • article 0 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Influência da localização das lesões nos desfechos clínicos tardios após intervenção coronária percutânea em enxertos de veia safena
    (2013) BEZERRA, Cristiano Guedes; VAHLE, Vitor de Andrade; MELO, Eduardo França Pessoa de; RIBEIRO, Henrique Barbosa; FALCÃO, Breno de Alencar Araripe; CAMPOS, Carlos Augusto Homem de Magalhães; PERIN, Marco Antônio; SILVA, Expedito Eustáquio Ribeiro da; KALIL FILHO, Roberto; LEMOS NETO, Pedro Alves
    BACKGROUND: Little is known about the late clinical outcomes of patients undergoing saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention (SVG-PCI), and there are controversies regarding the role of lesion location (aorto-ostial or graft body). METHODS: Single-center registry including patients undergoing SVG-PCI between 2006 and 2011. Aorto-ostial lesion was defined as a lesion within the first 8 mm of the graft; graft body lesion was defined as a lesion located in the remaining portions of the graft. Interventions approaching only the distal anastomosis or the native coronary bed were excluded. We evaluated the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) between the groups. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-five patients were evaluated, 69 in the Aorto-Ostial Group and 126 in the Graft Body Group. Mean age was 69.6 ± 10.2 years, 41% were diabetic, 65.1% had acute coronary syndromes and most of them were treated with bare metal stents (82.5%). There was no statistical difference between groups for most of the characteristics evaluated. In the late follow-up, the TVR rate (50.8% vs. 22%; P = 0.03) was greater in the Aorto-Ostial Group. The MACE rate (67.7% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.33), death (31.7% vs. 35.6%; P = 0.95) and MI (55% vs. 42%; P = 0.64) were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This population included a high-risk subgroup, with high late mortality rates, regardless of the location of the lesion in the graft. In patients treated predominantly by bare-metal stents, aorto-ostial lesions had a higher reintervention rate when compared to graft body lesions.