CARLOS WALTER SOBRADO JUNIOR

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
8
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina - Médico

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 4 de 4
  • article 4 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    T’chorim, Emerods, Hemorrhoids: From the Hebrew Scriptures to today
    (2020) SOBRADO, Carlos Walter; MESTER, Marcelo
  • article 8 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Management of ulcerative colitis: a clinical update
    (2015) TEIXEIRA, Fabio Vieira; HOSNE, Rogerio Saad; SOBRADO, Carlos Walter
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the consensus of expert societies and published guidelines on the management of ulcerative colitis, and to compare with the experience of the authors, in order to standardize procedures that would help the reasoning and decision- making process of the physician. A search was performed in scientific literature, specifically in electronic databases: Medline/Pubmed, SciELO, EMBASE and Cochrane, and the following descriptors were used: ulcerative colitis, acute colitis, clinical treatment, surgery and ran- domized trial. It can be concluded that the goals of therapy in ulcerative colitis are clinical and endoscopic remission, deep, sustained remission without corticosteroids, prevention of hospitalizations and surgeries, and improved quality of life. The surgical indications are reserved for selected cases, ranging from medical intractability, complications (severe refractory acute colitis, toxic megacolon, perforation and hemorrhage) and malignancy. Information in this review article must be submitted to evaluation and criticism of the spe- cialist responsible for the conduct to be followed, in the face of his/her reality and the clinical status of each patient. The degree of recommendation and strength of evidence were based using the GRADE sys- tem (The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) described below: 1. A: Experimental or observational studies of higher consistency. 2. B: Experimental or observational studies of lower consistency. 3. C: Case reports (non-controlled studies). 4. D: Opinion without critical evaluation, based on consensus, physiological studies or animal models.
  • article 34 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Diagnosis and treatment of constipation: a clinical update based on the Rome IV criteria
    (2018) SOBRADO, Carlos Walter; CORRêA NETO, Isaac José Felippe; PINTO, Rodrigo Ambar; SOBRADO, Lucas Faraco; NAHAS, Sergio Carlos; CECCONELLO, Ivan
    ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to evaluate the published professional association guidelines regarding the current diagnosis and treatment of functional intestinal constipation in adults and to compare those guidelines with the authors' experience to standardize actions that aid clinical reasoning and decision-making for medical professionals. A literature search was conducted in the Medline/PubMed, Scielo, EMBASE and Cochrane online databases using the following terms: chronic constipation, diagnosis, management of chronic constipation, Roma IV and surgical treatment. Conclusively, chronic intestinal constipation is a common condition in adults and occurs most frequently in the elderly and in women. Establishing a precise diagnosis of the physiopathology of functional chronic constipation is complex and requires many functional tests in refractory cases. An understanding of intestinal motility and the defecatory process is critical for the appropriate management of chronic functional intestinal constipation, with surgery reserved for cases in which pharmacologic intervention has failed. The information contained in this review article is subject to the critical evaluation of the medical specialist responsible for determining the action plan to be followed within the context of the conditions and clinical status of each individual patient.
  • article 2 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ADULT CROHN’S DISEASE AND ULCERATIVE COLITIS PATIENTS: A CONSENSUS FROM THE BRAZILIAN ORGANIZATION OF CROHN’S DISEASE AND COLITIS (GEDIIB)
    (2022) ZABOT, Gilmara Pandolfo; CASSOL, Ornella Sari; QUARESMA, Abel Botelho; GONÇALVES FILHO, Francisco de Assis; BAIMA, Júlio Pinheiro; IMBRIZI, Marcello; ROLIM, Alexandre de Sá; CARMO, Alexandre Medeiros do; ALVES JUNIOR, Antonio Jose Tiburcio; SANTOS, Carlos Henrique Marques dos; SOBRADO JUNIOR, Carlos Walter; MIRANDA, Eron Fábio; ALBUQUERQUE, Idblan Carvalho de; SOUZA, Mardem Machado de; KAISER JUNIOR, Roberto Luiz; PARRA, Rogerio Serafim; KOTZE, Paulo Gustavo; SAAD-HOSSNE, Rogério
    ABSTRACT Background: Despite optimized medical therapy, contemporary risk of surgery in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) after 10 years of diagnosis is 9.2% in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 26.2% in Crohn’s disease, (CD) in the biological era. Objective: This consensus aims to detail guidance to the most appropriate surgical procedures in different IBD scenarios. In addition, it details surgical indications and perioperative management of adult patients with CD and UC. Methods: Our consensus was developed by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists representing the Brazilian Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (GEDIIB), with the Rapid Review methodology being conducted to support the recommendations/statements. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the disease phenotypes, surgical indications, and techniques. After structuring the recommendations/statements, the modified Delphi Panel methodology was used to conduct the voting by experts in IBD surgery and gastroenterology. This consisted of three rounds: two using a personalized and anonymous online voting platform and one face-to-face presential meeting. Whenever participants did not agree with specific statements or recommendations, an option to outline possible reasons was offered to enable free-text responses and provide the opportunity for the experts to elaborate or explain disagreement. The consensus of recommendations/statements in each round was considered to have been reached if there was ≥80% agreement. Results and conclusion: This consensus addressed the most relevant information to guide the decision-making process for adequate surgical management of CD and UC. It synthesizes recommendations developed from evidence-based statements and state-of-art knowledge. Surgical recommendations were structured and mapped according to the different disease phenotypes, indications for surgery and perioperative management. Specific focus of our consensus was given to elective and emergency surgical procedures, determining when to indicate surgery and which procedures may be the more appropriate. The consensus is targeted to gastroenterologists and surgeons interested in the treatment and management of adult patients with CD or UC and supports decision-making of healthcare payors, institutional leaders, and/or administrators.