FABRICIO FERREIRA COELHO
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/02 - Laboratório de Anatomia Médico-Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/02 - Laboratório de Anatomia Médico-Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
7 resultados
Resultados de Busca
Agora exibindo 1 - 7 de 7
- Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long-term outcomes(2020) JUNIOR, Sergio S.; COELHO, Fabricio F.; TUSTUMI, Francisco; CASSENOTE, Alex J. F.; JEISMANN, Vagner B.; FONSECA, Gilton M.; KRUGER, Jaime A. P.; ERNANI, Lucas; CECCONELLO, Ivan; HERMAN, PauloBackground En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). Objectives To compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. Methods From a prospective database, a case-matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival. Results Fifty-three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320-525] vs 360 [270-440] minutes,P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400-800] vs 400 [100-600] mL;P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6-14] vs 7 [5-9] days;P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%,P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54-6.05]; OR >= 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35-13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91-29.51]; OR >= 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52-79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease-free survival (P = .28) were observed. Conclusion MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.
- BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF HEPATOLOGY UPDATED RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA(2020) CHAGAS, Aline Lopes; MATTOS, Angelo Alves de; CARRILHO, Flair José; BITTENCOURT, Paulo Lisboa; VEZOZZO, Denise Cerqueira Paranaguá; HORVAT, Natally; ROCHA, Manoel de Souza; ALVES, Venâncio Avancini Ferreira; CORAL, Gabriela Perdomo; ALVARES-DA-SILVA, Mario Reis; BARROS, Fabio Marinho do Rego; MENEZES, Marcos Roberto; MONSIGNORE, Lucas Moretti; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; SILVA, Renato Ferreira da; SILVA, Rita de Cássia Martins Alves; BOIN, Ilka de Fatima Santana Ferreira; D`ALBUQUERQUE, Luiz Augusto Carneiro; GARCIA, José Huygens Parente; FELGA, Guilherme Eduardo Gonçalves; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; BRAGHIROLI, Maria Ignez Freitas Melro; HOFF, Paulo Marcelo Gehm; MELLO, Vivianne Barretto de; DOTTORI, Mariana Fonseca; BRANCO, Tiago Pugliese; SCHIAVON, Leonardo de Lucca; COSTA, Thaisa de Fátima AlmeidaABSTRACT Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The Brazilian Society of Hepatology (SBH) published in 2015 its first recommendations about the management of HCC. Since then, new data have emerged in the literature, prompting the governing board of SBH to sponsor a single-topic meeting in August 2018 in São Paulo. All the invited experts were asked to make a systematic review of the literature reviewing the management of HCC in subjects with cirrhosis. After the meeting, all panelists gathered together for the discussion of the topics and the elaboration of updated recommendations. The text was subsequently submitted for suggestions and approval of all members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology through its homepage. The present manuscript is the final version of the reviewed manuscript containing the recommendations of SBH.
article 3 Citação(ões) na Scopus Long-term Outcome of a Modified Piggyback Liver Transplantation Technique Using the Recipient?s Right and Middle Hepatic Veins(2020) MASSAROLLO, Paulo Celso Bosco; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; BRESCIA, Marilia D'Elboux Guimaraes; BAIA, Carlos Eduardo Sandoli; LALLEE, Margareth Pauli; ALMEIDA, Marcio Dias de; SALZEDAS-NETTO, Alcides Augusto; COPPINI, Adriana Zuolo; MASSAROLLO, Daniel Braga; MIES, Sergio- Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver with biliary communication: case report and surgical therapeutic option(2020) FERREIRA, Raphaella; ABREU, Phillipe; JEISMANN, Vagner Birk; SEGATELLI, Vanderlei; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; DAVID, Andre IbrahimBackground Mucinous cyst neoplasm of the liver (MCN-L) comprise less than 5% of all cystic liver lesions and is characterized by the presence of ovarian stroma and absence of bile duct communication. Case presentation Here, we discuss a 45-year-old woman who presented with symptomatic liver mass. Diagnostic workup detected a 4.2 x 3.6 cm septate cyst located in segments I, V, and VIII of the liver in communication with the right hepatic duct. An open right liver resection with total bile duct excision and hilar lymphadenectomy was performed. Pathology revealed a multiloculated cyst with lined mucinous epithelium and ovarian-like stroma, consistent with low-grade MCN-L. Conclusions This case shows that unusual location and bile duct communication can be present in MCN-L.
- Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A South American Experience with 2887 Cases(2020) PEKOLJ, J.; SANCHEZ, R. Claria; SALCEDA, J.; MAURETTE, R. J.; SCHELOTTO, P. B.; PIERINI, L.; CANEPA, E.; MORO, M.; STORK, G.; RESIO, N.; NEFFA, J.; CORMACK, L. Mc; QUINONEZ, E.; RAFFIN, G.; OBEIDE, L.; FERNANDEZ, D.; PFAFFEN, G.; SALAS, C.; LINZEY, M.; SCHMIDT, G.; RUIZ, S.; ALVAREZ, F.; BUFFALIZA, J.; MARONI, R.; CAMPI, O.; BERTONA, C.; SANTIBANES, M. de; MAZZA, O.; OLIVEIRA, M. Belotto de; DINIZ, A. L.; OLIVEIRA, M. Enne de; MACHADO, M. A.; KALIL, A. N.; PINTO, R. D.; REZENDE, A. P.; RAMOS, E. J. B.; OLIVEIRA, A. Talvane T.; TORRES, O. J. M.; CASSIS, N. Jarufe; BUCKEL, E.; TORRES, R. Quevedo; CHAPOCHNICK, J.; GARCIA, M. Sanhueza; MUNOZ, C.; CASTRO, G.; LOSADA, H.; SUAREZ, F. Vergara; GUEVARA, O.; DAVILA, D.; PALACIOS, O.; JIMENEZ, A.; POGGI, L.; TORRES, V.; FONSECA, G. M.; KRUGER, J. A. P.; COELHO, F. F.; RUSSO, L.; HERMAN, P.Background Laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) have been increasingly performed in recent years. Most of the available evidence, however, comes from specialized centers in Asia, Europe and USA. Data from South America are limited and based on single-center experiences. To date, no multicenter studies evaluated the results of LLR in South America. The aim of this study was to evaluate the experience and results with LLR in South American centers. Methods From February to November 2019, a survey about LLR was conducted in 61 hepatobiliary centers in South America, composed by 20 questions concerning demographic characteristics, surgical data, and perioperative results. Results Fifty-one (83.6%) centers from seven different countries answered the survey. A total of 2887 LLR were performed, as follows: Argentina (928), Brazil (1326), Chile (322), Colombia (210), Paraguay (9), Peru (75), and Uruguay (8). The first program began in 1997; however, the majority (60.7%) started after 2010. The percentage of LLR over open resections was 28.4% (4.4-84%). Of the total, 76.5% were minor hepatectomies and 23.5% major, including 266 right hepatectomies and 343 left hepatectomies. The conversion rate was 9.7%, overall morbidity 13%, and mortality 0.7%. Conclusions This is the largest study assessing the dissemination and results of LLR in South America. It showed an increasing number of centers performing LLR with the promising perioperative results, aligned with other worldwide excellence centers.
- Minimally invasive versus open right hepatectomy: comparative study with propensity score matching analysis(2020) DUARTE, Vinicius Campos; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; VALVERDE, Alain; DANOUSSOU, Divia; KRUGER, Jaime Arthur Pirola; ZUBER, Kevin; FONSECA, Gilton Marques; JEISMANN, Vagner Birk; HERMAN, Paulo; LUPINACCI, Renato MicelliBackground Minimally invasive liver resections (MILRs) have been increasingly performed in recent years. However, the majority of MILRs are actually minor or limited resections of peripheral lesions. Due to the technical complexity major hepatectomies remain challenging for minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive right hepatectomies (MIRHs) with contemporary patients undergoing open right hepatectomies (ORHs) Methods Consecutive patients submitted to anatomic right hepatectomies between January 2013 and December 2018 in two tertiary referral centers were studied. Study groups were compared on an intention-to-treat basis after propensity score matching (PSM). Overall survival (OS) analyses were performed for the entire cohort and specific etiologies subgroups Results During study period 178 right hepatectomies were performed. After matching, 37 patients were included in MIRH group and 60 in ORH group. The groups were homogenous for all baseline characteristics. MIRHs had significant lower blood loss (400 ml vs. 500 ml, P = 0.01), lower rate of minor complications (13.5% vs. 35%, P = 0.03) and larger resection margins (10 mm vs. 5 mm, P = 0.03) when compared to ORHs. Additionally, a non-significant decrease in hospital stay (ORH 9 days vs. MIRH 7 days, P = 0.09) was observed. No differences regarding the use of Pringle's maneuver, operative time, overall morbidity or perioperative mortality were observed. OS was similar between the groups (P = 0.13). Similarly, no difference in OS was found in subgroups of patients with primary liver tumors (P = 0.09) and liver metastasis (P = 0.80). Conclusions MIRHs are feasible and safe in experienced hands. Minimally invasive approach was associated with less blood loss, a significant reduction in minor perioperative complications, and did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.
- Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma during the COVID-19 Pandemic - Sao Paulo Clinicas Liver Cancer Group Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement(2020) CHAGAS, Aline Lopes; FONSECA, Leonardo Gomes; COELHO, Fabricio Ferreira; SAUD, Lisa Rodrigues Cunha; ABADALA, Edson; ANDRAUS, Wellington; FIORE, Lucas; MOREIRA, Airton Mota; MENEZES, Marcos Roberto; CARNEVALE, Francisco Cesar; TANI, Claudia Megumi; ALENCAR, Regiane S. S. M.; D'ALBUQUERQUE, Luiz Augusto Carneiro; HERMAN, Paulo; CARRILHO, Flair JoseMore than 18 million people in 188 countries have been diagnosed as having coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and COVID-19 has been responsible for more than 600,000 deaths worldwide. Brazil is now the second most affected country globally. Faced with this scenario, various public health measures and changes in the daily routines of hospitals were implemented to stop the pandemic. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are at an increased risk for severe COVID-19 as they present with two major diseases: cancer and concomitant chronic liver disease. The COVID-19 pandemic can significantly impact the management of HCC patients from diagnosis to treatment strategies. These patients need special attention and assistance at this time, especially since treatment for tumors cannot be delayed in most cases. The aim of this guideline was to standardize the management of HCC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This document was developed, on the basis of the best evidence available, by a multidisciplinary team from Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), and Instituto Central of the Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade de Sao Paulo (HC-FMUSP), which are members of the Sao Paulo Cli ' nicas Liver Cancer Group.