Propensity-score Matched and Coarsened-exact Matched Analysis Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Major Hepatectomies: <i>An International Multicenter Study of</i> 4822 <i>Cases</i>

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
10
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
LIU, Qu
ZHANG, Wanguang
ZHAO, Joseph J.
SYN, Nicholas L.
CIPRIANI, Federica
ALZOUBI, Mohammad
AGHAYAN, Davit L.
SIOW, Tiing-Foong
LIM, Chetana
SCATTON, Olivier
Citação
ANNALS OF SURGERY, v.278, n.6, p.969-975, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To compare the outcomes between robotic major hepatectomy (R-MH) and laparoscopic major hepatectomy (L-MH). Background: Robotic techniques may overcome the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection. However, it is unknown whether R-MH is superior to L-MH. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of patients undergoing R-MH or L-MH at 59 international centers from 2008 to 2021. Data on patient demographics, center experience volume, perioperative outcomes, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. Both 1:1 propensity-score matched (PSM) and coarsened-exact matched (CEM) analyses were performed to minimize selection bias between both groups Results: A total of 4822 cases met the study criteria, of which 892 underwent R-MH and 3930 underwent L-MH. Both 1:1 PSM (841 R-MH vs. 841 L-MH) and CEM (237 R-MH vs. 356 L-MH) were performed. R-MH was associated with significantly less blood loss {PSM:200.0 [interquartile range (IQR):100.0, 450.0] vs 300.0 (IQR:150.0, 500.0) mL; P = 0.012; CEM:170.0 (IQR: 90.0, 400.0) vs 200.0 (IQR:100.0, 400.0) mL; P = 0.006}, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application (PSM: 47.1% vs 63.0%; P < 0.001; CEM: 54.0% vs 65.0%; P = 0.007) and open conversion (PSM: 5.1% vs 11.9%; P < 0.001; CEM: 5.5% vs 10.4%, P = 0.04) compared with L-MH. On subset analysis of 1273 patients with cirrhosis, R-MH was associated with a lower postoperative morbidity rate (PSM: 19.5% vs 29.9%; P = 0.02; CEM 10.4% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and shorter postoperative stay [PSM: 6.9 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 8.0 (IQR: 6.0 11.3) days; P < 0.001; CEM 7.0 (IQR: 5.0, 9.0) days vs 7.0 (IQR: 6.0, 10.0) days; P = 0.047]. Conclusions: This international multicenter study demonstrated that R-MH was comparable to L-MH in safety and was associated with reduced blood loss, lower rates of Pringle maneuver application, and conversion to open surgery.
Palavras-chave
laparoscopic liver resection, extended right hepatectomy, major hepatectomy, right hepatectomy, robotic liver resection
Referências
  1. Abu Hilal M, 2018, ANN SURG, V268, P11, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524
  2. Ban D, 2014, J HEPATO-BIL-PAN SCI, V21, P745, DOI 10.1002/jhbp.166
  3. Barron JO, 2022, SURG ENDOSC, V36, P3601, DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08561-4
  4. Beard RE, 2020, WORLD J SURG, V44, P887, DOI 10.1007/s00268-019-05270-x
  5. Buell JF, 2009, ANN SURG, V250, P825, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b3b2d8
  6. Cai JW, 2020, SURG ENDOSC, V34, P2807, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-07513-8
  7. Cheung TT, 2016, ANN SURG, V264, P612, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001848
  8. Chin KM, 2022, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V26, P1041, DOI 10.1007/s11605-021-05226-4
  9. Chiow AKH, 2021, BRIT J SURG, V108, P1513, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znab321
  10. Choi SH, 2020, SURG ONCOL, V35, P39, DOI 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.07.003
  11. Chong CC, 2022, JAMA SURG, V157, P436, DOI 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0161
  12. Chong CCN, 2020, SURG ENDOSC, V34, P2000, DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-06976-8
  13. Chua D, 2021, BRIT J SURG, V108, P351, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znaa118
  14. Cipriani F, 2022, J HEPATO-BIL-PAN SCI, V29, P1108, DOI 10.1002/jhbp.1022
  15. Ciria R, 2022, J HEPATO-BIL-PAN SCI, V29, P41, DOI 10.1002/jhbp.959
  16. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  17. Fagenson AM, 2021, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V25, P85, DOI 10.1007/s11605-020-04703-6
  18. Giulianotti PC, 2011, SURGERY, V149, P29, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2010.04.002
  19. Goh BK, 2020, ANN ACAD MED SINGAP, V49, P742, DOI 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202036
  20. Goh BKP, 2021, SURG ENDOSC, V35, P5231, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-08018-0
  21. Goh BKP, 2020, ANZ J SURG, V90, P553, DOI 10.1111/ans.15563
  22. Goh BKP, 2019, ANZ J SURG, V89, P201, DOI 10.1111/ans.14417
  23. Han HS, 2015, J HEPATOL, V63, P643, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005
  24. Hobeika C, 2020, J HEPATOL, V73, P1100, DOI 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.05.003
  25. Hu YN, 2021, ASIAN J SURG, V44, P615, DOI 10.1016/j.asjsur.2020.12.016
  26. Ibuki S, 2022, ANN SURG, V275, P940, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004434
  27. Kabir T, 2022, BRIT J SURG, V109, P21, DOI [10.1093/bis/znab376, 10.1093/bjs/znab376]
  28. Kadam P, 2022, J HEPATO-BIL-PAN SCI, V29, P843, DOI 10.1002/jhbp.1149
  29. Kamarajah SK, 2021, SCAND J SURG, V110, P290, DOI 10.1177/1457496920925637
  30. Kasai M, 2018, SURGERY, V163, P985, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020
  31. Kawaguchi Y, 2018, ANN SURG, V267, P13, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002176
  32. Lai ECH, 2016, SURG LAPARO ENDO PER, V26, P162, DOI 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000254
  33. Liu Q, 2020, INT J SURG, V81, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.022
  34. Marino MV, 2019, DIGEST SURG, V36, P241, DOI 10.1159/000487686
  35. Montalti R, 2016, SURG ENDOSC, V30, P1004, DOI 10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9
  36. Nagino M, 2021, ANN SURG, V274, P1, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004808
  37. REICH H, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P956
  38. Spampinato MG, 2014, SURG ENDOSC, V28, P2973, DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3560-4
  39. Strasberg SM, 2005, J HEPATO-BILIARY-PAN, V12, P351, DOI 10.1007/s00534-005-0999-7
  40. Troisi RI, 2021, BRIT J SURG, V108, P196, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znaa041
  41. Troisi RI, 2014, HPB, V16, P75, DOI 10.1111/hpb.12077
  42. Tsung A, 2014, ANN SURG, V259, P549, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250
  43. Wakabayashi G, 2015, ANN SURG, V261, P619, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184
  44. Yang HY, 2022, BRIT J SURG, V109, P311, DOI 10.1093/bjs/znab463
  45. Yoon YI, 2017, ANN SURG, V265, P856, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002072
  46. Zhang LL, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0240593
  47. Ziogas IA, 2021, SURG ENDOSC, V35, P524, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-08008-2