Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in postoperative atrial fibrillation: Cost-effectiveness analysis in a single-center, randomized, and prospective trial

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorPEREIRA, M. D. P.
dc.contributor.authorLIMA, E. G.
dc.contributor.authorPITTA, F. G.
dc.contributor.authorGOWDAK, L. H. W.
dc.contributor.authorMIOTO, B. M.
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, L. N. S.
dc.contributor.authorDARRIEUX, F. C. D. C.
dc.contributor.authorMEJIA, O. A. V.
dc.contributor.authorJATENE, F. B.
dc.contributor.authorSERRANO JR., C. V
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T19:53:14Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T19:53:14Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Postoperative atrial fibrillation is the most common clinical complication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. It is associated with a high risk of both stroke and death and increases the length of hospital stay and costs. This study aimed to evaluate anticoagulants in postoperative atrial fibrillation. Methods: A single-center, randomized, prospective, and open-label study. The trial was conducted in Heart Institute at University of São Paulo, Brazil. Patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation were randomized to anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or warfarin plus enoxaparin bridging. The primary objective was the cost-effectiveness evaluated by quality-adjusted life years, using the SF-6D questionnaire. The secondary end point was the combination of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, thromboembolic events, infections, bleeding, readmissions, and surgical reinterventions. The safety end point was any bleeding using the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis score. Follow-up period was 30 days after hospital discharge. Results: We analyzed 324 patients and 53 patients were randomized. The median cost-effectiveness was $1423.20 in the warfarin group versus $586.80 in the rivaroxaban group (P = .002). The median cost was lower in the rivaroxaban group, $450.20 versus $947.30 (P < .001). The secondary outcome was similar in both groups, 44.4% in warfarin group versus 38.5% in the rivaroxaban group (P = .65). Bleeding occured in 25.9% in the warfarin group versus 11.5% in the rivaroxaban group (P = .18). Conclusions: Rivaroxaban was more cost-effective when compared with warfarin associated with enoxaparin bridging in postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.eng
dc.description.indexPubMed
dc.description.indexScopus
dc.description.indexDimensions
dc.description.indexDimensions
dc.identifier.citationJTCVS OPEN, v.15, p.199-210, 2023
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.xjon.2023.05.006
dc.identifier.issn2666-2736
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58612
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER B.V.eng
dc.relation.ispartofJtcvs Open
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright ELSEVIER B.V.eng
dc.subjectanticoagulationeng
dc.subjectcoronary artery bypass surgeryeng
dc.subjectcost-effectiveeng
dc.subjectcostseng
dc.subjectdirect oral anticoagulanteng
dc.subjectpostoperative atrial fibrillationeng
dc.titleRivaroxaban versus warfarin in postoperative atrial fibrillation: Cost-effectiveness analysis in a single-center, randomized, and prospective trialeng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryoriginal articleeng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.citation.scopus1
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARCEL DE PAULA PEREIRA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcEDUARDO GOMES LIMA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcFABIO GRUNSPUN PITTA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcLUIS HENRIQUE WOLFF GOWDAK
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcBRUNO MAHLER MIOTO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcLETICIA NEVES SOLON CARVALHO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcFRANCISCO CARLOS DA COSTA DARRIEUX
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcOMAR ASDRUBAL VILCA MEJIA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcFABIO BISCEGLI JATENE
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcCARLOS VICENTE SERRANO JUNIOR
hcfmusp.description.beginpage199
hcfmusp.description.endpage210
hcfmusp.description.volume15
hcfmusp.origemSCOPUS
hcfmusp.origem.dimensionspub.1158578158
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85162869226
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHindricks G., Potpara T., Dagres N., Arbelo E., Bax J.J., Blomstrom-Lundqvist C., Et al., 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), Eur Heart J, 42, pp. 373-498, (2021)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJanuary C.T., Wann L.S., Calkins H., Field M.E., Chen L.Y., Furei K.L., Et al., 2019 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, J Circulation, 140, pp. e125-e151, (2019)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGillinov A.M., Bagiella E., Moskowitz A.J., Raiten J.M., Groh M.A., Bowdish M.E., Et al., Rate control versus rhythm control for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery, N Engl J Med, 374, pp. 1911-1921, (2016)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFrendl G.F., Sodickson A.C., Chung M.K., Waldo A.L., Gersh B.J., Tisdale J.E., Et al., 2014 AATS guidelines for the prevention and management of peri-operative atrial fibrillation and flutter (POAF) for thoracic surgical procedures, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 148, pp. e153-e193, (2014)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDobrev D., Aguillar M., Heijman J., Guichard J.B., Nattel S., Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, manifestations, and management, Nat Rev Cardiol, 16, pp. 417-436, (2019)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSteinberg B.A., Zhao Y., He X., Fernandez A.F., Fullerton D.A., Thomaz K.L., Et al., Management of postoperative atrial fibrillation and subsequent outcomes in contemporary patients undergoing cardiac surgery: insights from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons CAPS-Care Atrial Fibrillation Registry, Clin Cardiol, 37, pp. 7-13, (2014)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePhan K., Ha H.S.K., Phan S., Medi C., Thomas S.P., Yan T.D., New-onset atrial fibrillation following coronary bypass surgery predicts long-term mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 48, pp. 817-824, (2015)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLin M.H., Kamel H., Singer D.E., Wu Y.L., Lee M., Ovbiagele B., Perioperative/postoperative atrial fibrillation and risk of subsequent stroke and/or mortality a meta-analysis, Stroke, 50, pp. 1364-1371, (2019)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSaxena A., Dinh D.T., Smith J.A., Shardey G.C., Reid C.M., Newcomb A.E., Usefulness of postoperative atrial fibrillation as an independent predictor for worse early and late outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (multicenter Australian study of 19,497 patients), Am J Cardiol, 109, pp. 219-252, (2012)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEl-Chami M.F., Kilgo P., Thourani V., Lattoulf O.M., Delurgio D.B., Guyton R.A., Et al., New-onset atrial fibrillation predicts long-term mortality after coronary artery bypass graft, J Am Coll Cardiol, 55, pp. 1370-1376, (2010)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLapar D.J., Speier A.M., Crosby I.K., Fonner E., Brown M., Rich J.B., Et al., Postoperative atrial fibrillation significantly increases mortality, hospital readmission, and hospital costs, Ann Thorac Surg, 98, pp. 527-533, (2014)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnderson E., Johnke K., Leedahl D., Glogoza M., Newman R., Dyke C., Novel oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the management of post-operative atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes and cost analysis, Am J Surg, 210, pp. 1095-1102, (2015)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSezai A., Osaka S., Yaoita H., Arimoto M., Hata H., Tanaka M., Safety of the direct oral anticoagulant Edoxaban for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: pilot study, J Atr Fibrillation, 9, (2016)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNaik K.D., Whitson B.A., McLaughlin E.M., Matre N.B., Rozycki A.J., Safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after cardiac surgery, J Card Surg, 37, pp. 4740-4747, (2022)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSezai A., Taoka M., Osaka S., Kitazumi Y., Suzuki K., Kamata K., Et al., A comparative prospective observational study on the use of direct oral anticoagulants after cardiac surgery for the management of atrial fibrillation, Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 27, pp. 191-199, (2021)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKnuuti J., Wijns W., Saraste A., Capodanno D., Barbato E., Funck-Brentano C., Et al., 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes, Eur Heart J, 41, pp. 407-477, (2020)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCampolina A.G., Bortoluzzo A.B., Ferraz M.B., Ciconelli R.M., The SF-6D Brazil questionnaire: generation models and applications in health economics, Rev Assoc Med Bras, 56, pp. 409-414, (2010)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCruz L.N., Camey S.A., Hoffmann J.F., Rowen D., Brazier J.E., Fleck M.P., Et al., Estimating the SF-6D value set for a population-based sample of Brazilians, Value Health, 14, pp. S108-S114, (2011)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceScudeler T.L., Hueb W.A., Farkouh M.E., Maron D.J., Soarez P.C., Et al., Cost-effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with coronary artery disease: results from the MASS III trial, Int J Cardiol, 273, pp. 63-68, (2018)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRussel L.B., Gold M.R., Siegel J.E., Daniels N., Weinstein M.C., The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine, JAMA, 276, pp. 1172-1177, (1996)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBrazier J., Roberts J., Deverill M., The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36, J Health Econ, 21, pp. 271-292, (2002)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSousa-Uva M., Head S.J., Milojevic M., Collet J.P., Landoni G., Castella M., Et al., 2017 EACTS guidelines on perioperative medication in adult cardiac surgery, Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 53, pp. 5-33, (2018)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGaudino M., Benesch C., Bakaeen F., DeAnda A., Fremes S.E., Glance L., Et al., Considerations for reduction of risk of perioperative stroke in adult patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic aortic operations: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, Circulation, 142, pp. e193-e209, (2020)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGoyal P., Kim M., Krishnan U., Mccullough S.A., Cheung J.W., Kim L.K., Et al., Post-operative atrial fibrillation and risk of heart failure hospitalization, Eur Heart J, 43, pp. 2971-2980, (2022)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKosmidou I., Chen S., Kappetein P., Serruys P.W., Gersh B.J., Puskas J.D., Et al., New-onset atrial fibrillation after PCI or CABG for left main disease the EXCEL trial, J Am Coll Cardiol, 71, pp. 739-748, (2018)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAranki S.F., Shaw D.P., Adams D.H., Rizzo R.J., Cousper G.S., VanderVliet M., Et al., Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery: current trends and impact on hospital resources, Circulation, 94, pp. 390-397, (1996)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAhlsson A., Fengsrud E., Bodin L., Englund A., Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery carries an eightfold risk of future atrial fibrillation and a doubled cardiovascular mortality, Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg, 37, pp. 1353-1359, (2010)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLowres N., Mulcahy G., Jin K., Gallagher R., Neubeck L., Freedman B., Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients discharged in sinus rhythm after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 26, pp. 504-511, (2018)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMair H., Jilek C., Haas B., Lamm P., Ticagrelor and rivaroxaban elimination with Cytosorb Adsorber before urgent off-pump coronary bypass, Ann Thorac Surg, 110, pp. e369-e370, (2020)eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceConnolly S.J., Crowther M., Eikelboom J.W., Gibson M., Curnutte J.T., Et al., Full study report of Andexanet Alfa for bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, N Engl J Med, 380, pp. 1326-1335, (2019)eng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-04-12
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa5de1ffe-b562-4984-90c3-48a3553174b5
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa354095f-ee4d-48b4-8684-c6cdfa32b731
relation.isAuthorOfPublication35ce8a2e-9a92-4f00-b08b-432dcb07303e
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione0ab09b6-a894-4b61-b5ce-0fde4671de72
relation.isAuthorOfPublication9e7fb644-fcd7-4837-87d1-d066fbec5ea3
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2625b84f-2582-4726-9af0-35cccfc33aab
relation.isAuthorOfPublication58c4e1f0-429b-4e5f-b0d4-542437b39a34
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1211382f-dcaf-4d5e-89fc-7184fa642cf0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8af24ebc-578b-4192-8ea4-643cb9cd2377
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2c371782-3a13-4c0b-8caf-b4ad0359b67b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya5de1ffe-b562-4984-90c3-48a3553174b5
Arquivos