Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of adolescents and their parents: a specific analysis by sex and socioeconomic status

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMC
Autores
MESQUITA, Eduardo Duarte de Lima
CORREIA, Dayane Cristina Queiroz
GUICA, Juziane Teixeira
TORRES, Wesley
FERNANDES, Romulo Araujo
AGOSTINETE, Ricardo Ribeiro
CHRISTOFARO, Diego Giulliano Destro
Citação
ARCHIVES OF PUBLIC HEALTH, v.81, n.1, article ID 189, 9p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background The association of lifestyle habits of parents and of their children has been widely investigated as an important determinant for healthy habits in youth. Although parental sociodemographic characteristics are potential confounding factors in parent-child physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB), it is still unclear whether these factors have a moderating role in this association. This study aimed to analyze the association of parent-child PA and SB according to parental sex and economic level in adolescents.Methods The study sample was made up of 1231 adolescents (15.6 +/- 1.1 years, 58.2% of girls), 1202 mothers and 871 fathers. The leisure-time and commuting PA was assessed by the Baecke questionnaire, while sedentary behaviour (SB) was assessed according to hours per week of television viewing and computer use, by both adolescents and their parents. Economic status was analyzed using a questionnaire and classified as low, medium, and high. Linear models were used to assess the association of parent-child PA and SB in the different domains according to parental sex and economic level.Results Leisure time was associated between boys and their fathers in high (beta = 0.23, p = 0.044) and low economic classes (beta = 0.31, p < 0.001), and girls and their mothers in low economic class (beta = 0.38, p < 0.001). Commuting PA was associated between adolescents and both parents in low economic class (fathers beta = 0.21, p = 0.005; mothers (beta = 0.15, p = 0.020). TV time of boys was associated with TV time of fathers in low economic class (beta = 0.13, p = 0.022) and with TV time of mothers in medium economic class (beta = 0.13, p = 0.046). Among girls, TV time was associated with TV time of both parents only in low economic class (fathers beta = 0.28, p < 0.001; mothers beta = 0.25, p < 0.001). Computer use of girls was associated with computer use of fathers in high economic class (beta = 1.72, p = 0.043) and mothers in low economic class (beta = 0.57, p = 0.014), while no association was observed among boys.Conclusion Economic status was shown to be an important moderator of the association between parent-child PA and SB in adolescents.
Palavras-chave
Sedentary Behaviour, Physical activity, Adolescence, Childhood, Family
Referências
  1. BAECKE JAH, 1982, AM J CLIN NUTR, V36, P936
  2. Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
  3. Brazilian economic classification, criteria (Brazilian criteria)
  4. Cárdenas-Cárdenas LM, 2015, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V91, P136, DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2014.06.005
  5. Carson V, 2016, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR ME, V41, pS240, DOI 10.1139/apnm-2015-0630
  6. Christofaro DGD, 2019, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V16, P631, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2018-0173
  7. Cleland Verity, 2005, Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, V2, P3, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-2-3
  8. Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  9. da Silva GCR, 2023, SPORTS MED-OPEN, V9, DOI 10.1186/s40798-023-00562-y
  10. Christofaro DGD, 2018, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V94, P48, DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2017.01.007
  11. Christofaro DGD, 2015, BLOOD PRESSURE, V24, P317, DOI 10.3109/08037051.2015.1070475
  12. Donnelly S, 2022, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V93, P758, DOI 10.1080/02701367.2021.1918322
  13. Drenowatz C, 2010, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-214
  14. Elgar FJ, 2015, LANCET, V385, P2088, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61460-4
  15. Fernandes RA, 2010, HYPERTENS RES, V33, P926, DOI 10.1038/hr.2010.106
  16. Fernandes RA, 2015, CURR DIABETES REV, V11, P201, DOI 10.2174/1573399811666150401104515
  17. Gorely T, 2004, INT J BEHAV MED, V11, P152, DOI 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1103_4
  18. Guedes DP, 2006, Rev Port Ciencias do Desporto, V2006, P265
  19. Gustafson SL, 2006, SPORTS MED, V36, P79, DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636010-00006
  20. Hardy LL, 2007, PREV MED, V45, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.014
  21. Harvey DL, 2023, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V20, P348, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2022-0334
  22. Llewellyn A, 2016, OBES REV, V17, P56, DOI 10.1111/obr.12316
  23. Lovasi GS, 2009, EPIDEMIOL REV, V31, P7, DOI 10.1093/epirev/mxp005
  24. Manta SW, 2019, Rev Saude Publica, P53
  25. McNeill LH, 2007, J MED INTERNET RES, V9, DOI 10.2196/jmir.9.4.e35
  26. Ostergaard L, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-91
  27. Pizarro A, 2023, J EXERC SCI FIT, V21, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.05.002
  28. Prentice-Dunn H, 2012, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V17, P255, DOI 10.1080/13548506.2011.608806
  29. Rey-López JP, 2011, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V21, P151, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckq035
  30. Rodrigues D, 2018, J CHILD HEALTH CARE, V22, P159, DOI 10.1177/1367493517741686
  31. Rosenberg DE, 2010, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V7, P697, DOI 10.1123/jpah.7.6.697
  32. Schoeppe S, 2017, EUR J PUBLIC HEALTH, V27, P152, DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckw182
  33. Simmonds M, 2016, OBES REV, V17, P95, DOI 10.1111/obr.12334
  34. Su DLY, 2022, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V19, DOI 10.3390/ijerph192416861
  35. Tandon PS, 2021, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V18, DOI 10.3390/ijerph18136946
  36. Tebar WR, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0270265
  37. Telama R, 2009, OBESITY FACTS, V2, P187, DOI 10.1159/000222244
  38. Timperio AF, 2013, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V10, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-15
  39. Tremblay MS, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
  40. Welk GJ, 1999, QUEST, V51, P5, DOI 10.1080/00336297.1999.10484297
  41. Werneck AO, 2022, BMC Public Health, V22
  42. Xu C, 2018, PEERJ, V6, DOI 10.7717/peerj.4405