Feasibility of Transatrial Access for Epicardial Ablation Evaluation of 2 Different Techniques in Swine

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER
Citação
JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, v.9, n.11, p.2315-2328, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND The subxiphoid pericardial access is technically difficult and has a considerable rate of complications, thus transatrial access may be an alternative. OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the feasibility and safety of this strategy regarding periprocedural period and after 1-week follow-up. METHODS The investigators performed epicardial mapping through transatrial puncture in 20 swine. Animals were divided into group A, in which aspiration of the sheath was performed to maintain negative pressure after the withdraw of the catheters, and group B, in which a device (Konar-MF VSD Occluder) was delivered to occlude the right atrial appendage perforation. Bleeding was investigated immediately and 1 week after. RESULTS Access was safe in 19 of 20 animals (95%) with small amount of bleeding (6.4 +/- 6 mL). In group A (n = 10), 1 animal presented hemopericardium right after the puncture. In the other 9, epicardial ablation was performed and 60.0 +/- 28.0 mL of blood was aspirated without events. After 1 week, fibrin-hemorrhagic pericarditis was identified in 3 animals. In group B (n = 10), reaching the epicardial surface was possible in all animals. An adequate position of the prosthesis was obtained in 90% (9 of 10). One death occurred in the immediate postoperative period, secondary to pneumothorax. After 1 week, postmortem analysis showed absence of pericardial bleeding and a normal-appearing pericardium in the 8 animals with adequate prosthesis position. CONCLUSIONS Transatrial access allows epicardial mapping and ablation. Sheath removal after negative pressure contributes to achieving acute bleeding control but does not prevent its occurrence. The use of the device prevents bleeding and hemorrhagic pericarditis.
Palavras-chave
epicardial ablation, epicardial access, transatrial puncture
Referências
  1. Aminian A, 2015, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V86, P128, DOI 10.1002/ccd.25891
  2. Carmo AAL, 2015, HEART RHYTHM, V12, P461, DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.11.039
  3. Chokr MO, 2022, PACE, V45, P583, DOI 10.1111/pace.14477
  4. Chokr MO, 2022, J INTERV CARD ELECTR, V64, P35, DOI 10.1007/s10840-021-01025-8
  5. Da-Wariboko A, 2022, HEART RHYTHM, V19, P1022, DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.01.010
  6. Di Biase L, 2017, HEART RHYTHM, V14, P981, DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.02.033
  7. Greenbaum Adam B, 2015, JACC Clin Electrophysiol, V1, P434
  8. Gunda S, 2015, CIRC-ARRHYTHMIA ELEC, V8, P890, DOI 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002921
  9. Kim KH, 2018, JACC-CARDIOVASC IMAG, V11, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.06.017
  10. Koruth JS, 2011, CIRC-ARRHYTHMIA ELEC, V4, P882, DOI 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.965731
  11. Lelovas PP, 2014, J AM ASSOC LAB ANIM, V53, P432
  12. Macias C, 2016, HEART RHYTHM, V13, P2091, DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.07.013
  13. Mickelsen SR, 2005, PACE, V28, P1018, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00236.x
  14. Pisani CF, 2020, HEART RHYTHM, V17, P1510, DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.009
  15. Scanavacca MI, 2011, CIRC-ARRHYTHMIA ELEC, V4, P331, DOI 10.1161/CIRCEP.110.960799
  16. Sosa E, 1996, J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, V7, P531, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1996.tb00559.x
  17. Verrier RL, 1998, CIRCULATION, V98, P2331, DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.98.21.2331
  18. Waxman S, 2000, CATHETER CARDIO INTE, V49, P472, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-726X(200004)49:4<472::AID-CCD28>3.3.CO;2-P