EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage Versus ERCP in Malignant Biliary Obstruction Before Hepatobiliary Surgery

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
8
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
TYBERG, Amy
SARKAR, Avik
SHAHID, Haroon M.
SHAH-KHAN, Sardar M.
GAIDHANE, Monica
SIMON, Alexa
EISENBERG, Ian A.
LAJIN, Michael
KARAGYOZOV, Petko
LIAO, Kelvin
Citação
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, v.57, n.9, p.962-966, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) is the procedure of choice for patients who cannot undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The outcomes of patients undergoing surgery after EUS-BD for malignancy are unknown.Methods:We conducted an international, multicenter retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent hepatobiliary surgery after having undergone EUS-BD or ERCP from 6 tertiary care centers. Patient demographics, procedural data, and follow-up care were collected in a registry.Results:One hundred forty-five patients were included: EUS-BD n=58 (mean age 66, 45% male), ERCP n=87 (mean age 68, 53% male). The majority of patients had pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder malignancy. In the EUS-BD group, 29 patients had hepaticogastrostomy, 24 had choledochoduodenostomy, and 5 had rendezvous technique done. The most common surgery was Whipple in both groups (n=41 EUS-BD, n=56 ERCP) followed by partial hepatectomy (n=7 EUS-BD, n=14 ERCP) and cholecystectomy (n=2 EUS-BD, n=2 ERCP). Endoscopy clinical success was comparable in both groups (98% EUS-BD, 94% ERCP). Adverse event rates were similar in both groups: EUS-BD (n=10, 17%) and ERCP (n=23, 26%). Surgery technical success and clinical success were significantly higher in the EUS-BD group compared with the ERCP group (97% vs. 83%, 97% vs. 75%). Total Hospital stay from surgery to discharge was significantly higher in the ERCP group (19 d vs. 10 d, P=0.0082).Discussion:Undergoing EUS-BD versus ERCP before hepatobiliary surgery is associated with fewer repeat endoscopic interventions, shorter duration between endoscopy and surgical intervention, higher rates of surgical clinical success, and shorter length of hospital stay after surgery.
Palavras-chave
EUS-BD, ERCP, malignancy, biliary obstruction, surgery, Whipple
Referências
  1. Baars JE, 2018, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V7, P4, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_105_17
  2. Bang JY, 2018, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V88, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012
  3. Giovannini M, 2001, ENDOSCOPY, V33, P898, DOI 10.1055/s-2001-17324
  4. Hathorn KE, 2019, ENDOSC INT OPEN, V7, pE1432, DOI 10.1055/a-0990-9488
  5. Jin Z, 2020, DIGEST ENDOSC, V32, P16, DOI 10.1111/den.13456
  6. Kahaleh M, 2013, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V19, P1372, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v19.i9.1372
  7. Kakked G, 2020, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V9, P298, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_10_20
  8. Li DF, 2019, REV ESP ENFERM DIG, V111, P953, DOI 10.17235/reed.2019.6125/2018
  9. Lyu YX, 2021, DIGEST LIVER DIS, V53, P1247, DOI 10.1016/j.dld.2021.03.029
  10. Paik WH, 2018, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V113, P987, DOI 10.1038/s41395-018-0122-8
  11. Park JK, 2018, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V88, P277, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.015
  12. Saxena P, 2015, DIGEST ENDOSC, V27, P265, DOI 10.1111/den.12394
  13. Sharaiha R, 2013, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V78, P638, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2013.05.034
  14. Téllez-Avila FI, 2021, SURG ENDOSC, V35, P2531, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-07667-5
  15. Tyberg A, 2021, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V93, pAB266
  16. Tyberg A, 2020, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V9, P392, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_42_20
  17. Wiersema MJ, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P102, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(06)80108-2