Patterns of sedentary behavior in adults: A cross-sectional study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
3
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Autores
SILVA, Gustavo O. O.
CUNHA, Paolo M. M.
OLIVEIRA, Max D. D.
CHRISTOFARO, Diego G. D.
GERAGE, Aline M. M.
KANEGUSUKU, Helcio
CORREIA, Marilia A. A.
RITTI-DIAS, Raphael M. M.
Citação
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, v.10, article ID 1116499, 7p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
IntroductionSedentary behavior (SB) has been associated with adverse health outcomes, however, it is not completely clear whether total time in SB during the day or prolonged uninterrupted SB are interrelated. The aim of the current study was to describe the different patterns of SB of adults, their relationships, and associated factors.MethodsThe sample included 184 adults aged ranging from 18 to 59 years old. SB was objectively measured by an accelerometer and the following SB pattern parameters were obtained: total time in sedentary bouts, mean time of sedentary bouts, and total time in sedentary breaks. Demographic data (age and sex), anthropometry [weight, height, body mass index (BMI)], blood pressure (BP), medical history (self-reported comorbid conditions), and cardiac autonomic modulation, were assessed to identify factors associated with SB. Multiple linear regressions were used to analyze the relationship between SB parameters and the associated factors.ResultsThe parameters of SB indicated 2.4 (0.9) h/day for total time in sedentary bouts, 36.4 (7.9) min for the mean time of sedentary bouts, and 9.1 (1.9) h/day for the total time in sedentary breaks. Multiple adjusted regression indicated that age was the only factor associated with SB patterns (p < 0.05) after adjustment for confounding variables (sex, age, BMI, dyslipidemia, systolic and diastolic BP). Young adults (18-39 years old) spent more time in sedentary bouts and less time in uninterrupted sedentary bouts compared to middle-aged adults (40-59 years old) (2.58 (0.88) h/day vs. 2.13 (0.90) h/day, respectively; p = 0.001 and 34.5 (5.8) min 18-39 years old vs. 38.8 (9.6) min 40-59 years old; p <= 0.001; respectively). The total time in sedentary breaks was similar between age groups (p = 0.465). The total time in sedentary bouts was significantly correlated with the mean time of sedentary bouts (r = -0.58; p <= 0.001), and with the total time in sedentary breaks (r = -0.20; p = 0.006). The mean time of sedentary bouts was significantly related to the total time in sedentary breaks (r -= 0.19; p = 0.007).Discussion and ConclusionIn conclusion, age seems to be a relevant factor associated with sedentary behavior with young adults spending more time in SB and accumulating this behavior in a higher amount of sedentary bouts compared to middle-aged adults.
Palavras-chave
physical activity, cardiometabolic health, exercise, accelerometer, sitting
Referências
  1. Bellettiere J, 2019, CIRCULATION, V139, P1036, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035312
  2. Bergouignan A, 2011, J APPL PHYSIOL, V111, P1201, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00698.2011
  3. Biswas A, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P123, DOI 10.7326/M14-1651
  4. Carson V, 2014, PREV MED, V65, P23, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.005
  5. Catai AM, 2020, BRAZ J PHYS THER, V24, P91, DOI 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.02.006
  6. Christofaro DGD, 2023, EUR J SPORT SCI, V23, P649, DOI 10.1080/17461391.2022.2044913
  7. Craig CL, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1381, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
  8. Dempsey PC, 2018, HYPERTENSION, V72, P1037, DOI 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11190
  9. Diaz KM, 2016, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V48, P430, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000792
  10. Dunstan DW, 2021, NAT REV CARDIOL, V18, P637, DOI 10.1038/s41569-021-00547-y
  11. Dunstan DW, 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, P976, DOI 10.2337/dc11-1931
  12. Ekelund U, 2007, DIABETES CARE, V30, P337, DOI 10.2337/dc06-1883
  13. Grace MS, 2017, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V102, P1991, DOI 10.1210/jc.2016-3926
  14. Hallman DM, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16040650
  15. Hamilton MT, 2007, DIABETES, V56, P2655, DOI 10.2337/db07-0882
  16. Harris L, 2019, J APPL RES INTELLECT, V32, P1428, DOI 10.1111/jar.12633
  17. Healy GN, 2008, DIABETES CARE, V31, P369, DOI 10.2337/dc07-1795
  18. Healy GN, 2007, DIABETES CARE, V30, P1384, DOI 10.2337/dc07-0114
  19. Healy GN, 2011, EUR HEART J, V32, P590, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq451
  20. Helmerhorst HJF, 2009, DIABETES, V58, P1776, DOI 10.2337/db08-1773
  21. Janssen H, 2017, INT J STROKE, V12, P425, DOI 10.1177/1747493016676616
  22. Kruse NT, 2018, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V50, P801, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001484
  23. Larsen RN, 2014, NUTR METAB CARDIOVAS, V24, P976, DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.04.011
  24. Lim SS, 2012, LANCET, V380, P2224, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
  25. Vanderlei LCM, 2009, REV BRAS CIR CARDIOV, V24, P205, DOI 10.1590/S0102-76382009000200018
  26. Miot Hélio Amante, 2011, J. vasc. bras., V10, P275
  27. Paterson C, 2020, SPORTS MED, V50, P1929, DOI 10.1007/s40279-020-01325-5
  28. Pickering Thomas G, 2005, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V7, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2005.04377.x
  29. Saunders TJ, 2020, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR ME, V45, pS197, DOI 10.1139/apnm-2020-0272
  30. Saunders TJ, 2012, J NUTR METAB, V2012, DOI 10.1155/2012/712435
  31. Stamatakis E, 2019, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V73, P2062, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031
  32. Thayer JF, 2010, INT J CARDIOL, V141, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.543
  33. Tremblay MS, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
  34. Troiano RP, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, P181, DOI 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3
  35. Trost SG, 2000, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V32, P426, DOI 10.1097/00005768-200002000-00025
  36. Widlansky ME, 2003, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V42, P1149, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00994-X
  37. Woessner MN, 2021, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V9, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2021.655491