Bartter Syndrome-Related Variants Distribution: Brazilian Data and Its Comparison with Worldwide Cohorts

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
KARGER
Citação
NEPHRON, v.147, n.8, p.478-495, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Genetic testing is recommended for accurate diagnosis of Bartter syndrome (BS) and serves as a basis for implementing specific target therapies. However, populations other than Europeans and North Americans are underrepresented in most databases and there are uncertainties in the genotype-phenotype correlation. We studied Brazilian BS patients, an admixed population with diverse ancestry. Methods: We evaluated the clinical and mutational profile of this cohort and performed a systematic review of BS mutations from worldwide cohorts. Results: Twenty-two patients were included; Gitelman syndrome was diagnosed in 2 siblings with antenatal BS and congenital chloride diarrhea in 1 girl. BS was confirmed in 19 patients: BS type 1 in 1 boy (antenatal BS); BS type 4a in 1 girl and BS type 4b in 1 girl, both of them with antenatal BS and neurosensorial deafness; BS type 3 (CLCNKB mutations): 16 cases. The deletion of the entire CLCNKB (1-20 del) was the most frequent variant. Patients carrying the 1-20 del presented earlier manifestations than those with other CLCNKB-mutations and the presence of homozygous 1-20 del was correlated with progressive chronic kidney disease. The prevalence of the 1-20 del in this BS Brazilian cohort was similar to that of Chinese cohorts and individuals of African and Middle Eastern descent from other cohorts. Conclusion: This study expands the genetic spectrum of BS patients with different ethnics, reveals some genotype/phenotype correlations, compares the findings with other cohorts, and provides a systematic review of the literature on the distribution of BS-related variants worldwide.
Palavras-chave
Bartter syndrome, Gitelman syndrome, Pseudo-Bartter syndrome, Brazilian cohort, CLCNKB mutation
Referências
  1. Al Shibli Amar, 2015, World J Methodol, V5, P55, DOI 10.5662/wjm.v5.i2.55
  2. BARTTER FC, 1962, AM J MED, V33, P811, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(62)90214-0
  3. Bettinelli A, 2007, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V49, P91, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.10.001
  4. Bokhari SRA., 2018, STATPEARLS
  5. Brochard K, 2009, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V24, P1455, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfn689
  6. Chen HJ, 2020, BMC PEDIATR, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12887-020-02265-9
  7. Castaño AG, 2017, PLOS ONE, V12, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0173581
  8. Castaño AG, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074673
  9. Han Y, 2020, ENDOCRINE, V68, P192, DOI 10.1007/s12020-019-02156-9
  10. Han Y, 2017, ONCOTARGET, V8, P101614, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.21355
  11. Höglund P, 1998, AM J HUM GENET, V63, P760, DOI 10.1086/301998
  12. Imbrici P, 2017, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V595, P5403, DOI 10.1113/JP274645
  13. Ji WZ, 2008, NAT GENET, V40, P592, DOI 10.1038/ng.118
  14. Konrad M, 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V11, P1449, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V1181449
  15. Konrad M, 2021, KIDNEY INT, V99, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.035
  16. Lee BH, 2012, NEPHROL DIAL TRANSPL, V27, P1516, DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfr475
  17. Lee JW, 2016, J KOREAN MED SCI, V31, P47, DOI 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.1.47
  18. Li YH, 2019, MOL MED REP, V20, P65, DOI 10.3892/mmr.2019.10255
  19. Matsunoshita N, 2018, J HUM GENET, V63, P887, DOI 10.1038/s10038-018-0470-7
  20. Matsunoshita N, 2016, GENET MED, V18, P180, DOI 10.1038/gim.2015.56
  21. Najafi M, 2019, ORPHANET J RARE DIS, V14, DOI 10.1186/s13023-018-0981-5
  22. Naslavsky MS, 2021, AM J MED GENET C, V187, P357, DOI 10.1002/ajmg.c.31931
  23. Nesbit MA, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P2476, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1300253
  24. Nozu K, 2007, PEDIATR RES, V62, P364, DOI 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318123fb90
  25. Nozu K, 2010, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V95, pE511, DOI 10.1210/jc.2010-0392
  26. Page MJ, 2021, PLOS MED, V18, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583, 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.26633/RPSP.2022.112, 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016]
  27. Palazzo V, 2022, INT J MOL SCI, V23, DOI 10.3390/ijms23105641
  28. Nascimento CLP, 2014, J PEDIAT-BRAZIL, V90, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.jped.2014.01.012
  29. Pena SDJ, 2020, AM J MED GENET C, V184, P928, DOI 10.1002/ajmg.c.31853
  30. Richards S, 2015, GENET MED, V17, P405, DOI 10.1038/gim.2015.30
  31. Rodríguez-Soriano J, 2005, PEDIATR NEPHROL, V20, P891, DOI 10.1007/s00467-005-1867-z
  32. Schlingmann KP, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V350, P1314, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa032843
  33. Schurman SJ, 2001, J PEDIATR-US, V139, P105, DOI 10.1067/mpd.2001.115020
  34. Schwartz GJ, 2009, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V20, P629, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2008030287
  35. Seyberth HW, 2008, NAT CLIN PRACT NEPHR, V4, P560, DOI 10.1038/ncpneph0912
  36. Seyberth HW, 2011, PEDIATR NEPHROL, V26, P1789, DOI 10.1007/s00467-011-1871-4
  37. Seys E, 2017, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V28, P2540, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2016101057
  38. Simon DB, 1996, NAT GENET, V12, P24, DOI 10.1038/ng0196-24
  39. Simon DB, 1997, NAT GENET, V17, P171, DOI 10.1038/ng1097-171
  40. Tajima T, 2006, ENDOCR J, V53, P647, DOI 10.1507/endocrj.K06-034
  41. Urbanová M, 2011, FOLIA BIOL-PRAGUE, V57, P65
  42. Vaisbich MH, 2004, PEDIATR NEPHROL, V19, P858, DOI 10.1007/s00467-004-1527-8
  43. Vaisbich MH., 2019, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V05, P2, DOI [10.36648/2380-7245.5.2.196, DOI 10.36648/2380-7245.5.2.196]
  44. Van Naarden K, 1999, PEDIATRICS, V104, P905, DOI 10.1542/peds.104.4.905
  45. Walsh PR, 2018, CLIN KIDNEY J, V11, P302, DOI 10.1093/ckj/sfx118