A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse for the development of core outcome sets

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_RADA_A_systematic_review_and_metasynthesis_of_qualitative_studies_2020.PDF.pdf (680.23 KB)
Citações na Scopus
26
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2020
Editora
WILEY
DOI
Indexadores
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Métricas da Revista
JCR
SJR
Autores
RADA, Maria Patricia
JONES, Stephanie
FALCONI, Gabriele
BETSCHART, Cornelia
PERGIALIOTIS, Vasilios
DOUMOUCHTSIS, Stergios K.
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
CHORUS Int
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, v.39, n.3, p.880-889, 2020
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Aims In the current climate of evidence-based health care, the aim of this meta-synthesis was to collect and systematically analyse data from primary qualitative studies on pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to identify patient-centered perspectives on the natural course of POP. Information acquired in this study may be useful for ongoing research towards the development of core outcome sets (COS) in pelvic floor disorders. Methods A CHORUS Working Group performed a standardized search of three different databases (Medline, Embase, Scopus), from inception to October 2019. We selected qualitative studies on women's perspectives on POP that were published in the English language. Three reviewers independently evaluated the quality of eligible papers and highlighted recurrent themes based on patient perspectives. Results Eighteen qualitative studies including a total of 497 patients were assessed in this analysis. Our study revealed five superordinate themes, recurrently encountered in qualitative studies on POP: awareness of POP (6 studies), communication (9 studies), treatments (10 studies), effects on quality of life (6 studies), and self-image (3 studies). Five out of 10 quality criteria were met by all the studies included, based on an assessment performed using the critical appraisal skills program. Conclusions This is the first synthesis of qualitative studies that address POP-related experiences of women, highlighting five superordinate themes, of which treatment was the most commonly reported one. This synthesis' findings may guide quantitative research priorities and will hopefully contribute to the development of a COS for POP.
Palavras-chave
patient perspective, pelvic organ prolapse, qualitative research, risk of bias, thematic synthesis
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36180
Referências
  1. Abhyankar P, 2019, BMC WOMENS HEALTH, V19, DOI 10.1186/s12905-019-0741-2
  2. Alas AN, 2016, FEMALE PELVIC MED RE, V22, P460, DOI 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000315
  3. An International Collaboration for Harmonising Outcomes R and Standards in Urogynaecology and Women's Health, 2019, DEV COR OUTC SET FEM
  4. Atieno OP, 2009, PROBL EDUC 21ST CENT, V13, P13
  5. Baskayne K, 2014, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V33, P85, DOI 10.1002/nau.22380
  6. Basu M, 2011, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V118, P338, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02786.x
  7. Blystad A, 2018, INT UROGYNECOL J, V29, P679, DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3515-0
  8. Brazell HD, 2013, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V209, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.022
  9. Castleberry A, 2018, CURR PHARM TEACH LEA, V10, P807, DOI 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019
  10. Chalise Mala, 2016, WHO South East Asia J Public Health, V5, P141, DOI 10.4103/2224-3151.206251
  11. Lourenco TRD, 2019, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V38, P509, DOI 10.1002/nau.23871
  12. Durnea C, 2018, INT UROGYNECOL J, V29, P1727, DOI 10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5
  13. Edwards R, 2013, WHAT IS QUALITATIVE
  14. Ghetti C, 2015, FEMALE PELVIC MED RE, V21, P332, DOI 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000190
  15. Gjerde JL, 2018, BMC WOMENS HEALTH, V18, DOI 10.1186/s12905-018-0568-2
  16. Gjerde JL, 2018, PLOS ONE, V13, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207651
  17. Gjerde JL, 2017, INT UROGYNECOL J, V28, P361, DOI 10.1007/s00192-016-3077-6
  18. Hannes K, 2013, SYST REV, V2, DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-2-84
  19. Kenton K, 2006, BJU INT, V98, P1, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06299.x
  20. Kiyosaki K, 2012, FEMALE PELVIC MED RE, V18, P137, DOI 10.1097/SPV.0b013e318254f09c
  21. Krueger R. A., 2014, FOCUS GROUPS PRACTIC
  22. Lagana AS, 2018, J PSYCHOSOM OBST GYN, V39, P164, DOI 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1294155
  23. Lewicky-Gaupp C, 2009, INT UROGYNECOL J, V20, P927, DOI 10.1007/s00192-009-0890-1
  24. Lorenc T, 2016, SYST REV-LONDON, V5, DOI 10.1186/s13643-016-0366-6
  25. Low LK, 2012, J MIDWIFERY WOM HEAL, V57, P489, DOI 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00187.x
  26. Lowder JL, 2011, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V204, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.12.024
  27. Mahfooza A, 2011, INT CONTINENCE SOC
  28. MOHER D, 1995, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V16, P62, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-W
  29. Moja LP, 2005, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V330, P1053, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38414.515938.8F
  30. Muller N, 2010, AUST NZ CONT J, V16, P70
  31. O'Dell Katharine K, 2005, Urol Nurs, V25, P345
  32. Pakbaz M, 2011, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V90, P1115, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01225.x
  33. Pakbaz M, 2010, BMC WOMENS HEALTH, V10, DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-10-18
  34. Ravindran TS, 1999, SAFE MOTHERHOOD INIT, P166
  35. Roos AM, 2014, J SEX MED, V11, P743, DOI 10.1111/jsm.12070
  36. Rortveit G, 2007, OBSTET GYNECOL, V109, P1396, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263469.68106.90
  37. Streeton Rosemarie, 2004, Nurse Res, V12, P35
  38. The Cochrane Collaboration, COCHR DAT COLL INT R
  39. The Oxford Centre for Triple Value Healthcare, CRIT APPR SKILLS PRO
  40. Thomas J, 2008, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V8, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
  41. Tong A, 2012, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V12, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
  42. Toye F, 2014, BMC MED RES METHODOL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
  43. Verhagen AP, 2001, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V54, P651, DOI 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00360-7
  44. Williamson Graham R, 2005, Nurse Res, V12, P7
  45. WILLIAMSON PR, 2017, [No title captured], V18, DOI 10.1186/S13063-017-1978-4
  46. Wu JM, 2009, OBSTET GYNECOL, V114, P1278, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/58