Advanced age does not increase morbidity in pancreaticoduodenectomy

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PIONEER BIOSCIENCE PUBL CO
Citação
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, v.9, n.1, p.11-16, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Due to rising life expectancy of population, very complex surgical procedures such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), are more commonly being performed in elderly patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of PD in patients older than 75 years old and the risk factors associated with severe complications. Methods: Patients who underwent PD for periampullary tumors were retrospectively reviewed and divided into two groups, A (<75 years) and B (>75 years). The primary endpoint was severe postoperative complications (Clavien 3 or greater). Secondary endpoints were mortality and any complications. Results: Ninety consecutive patients underwent PD for periampullary tumors in the studied period, 70 in group A and 20 in group B. Clinical and pathological characteristics of both groups were equivalents except for age. There were no difference regarding the incidence of severe complications (17% vs. 10%, P=0.72) or all complications (50% vs. 50%, P>0.999). Although mortality was greater in group A (8.6% vs. 0%), it was not statistically significant (P=0.333). On multivariate analyses, only male sex, obesity and American Society of Anesthesiology Score of 3 or 4 were associated with severe postoperative complications. Conclusions: Poor clinical status, obesity and male gender are associated with severe complications in PD, but not age greater than 75 years, therefore PD can be considered safe in elderly patients and age itself should not be a contraindication for PD.
Palavras-chave
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), morbidity, elderly, risk factors
Referências
  1. [Anonymous], 1975, SEER CANC STAT REV
  2. Bassi C, 2005, SURGERY, V138, P8, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.001
  3. Cameron JL, 2006, ANN SURG, V244, P10, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
  4. Dale W, 2014, ANN SURG, V259, P960, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000226
  5. de la Fuente SG, 2011, HPB, V13, P887, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00390.x
  6. Dindo D, 2004, ANN SURG, V240, P205, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
  7. Eisenberg JD, 2015, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V19, P1572, DOI 10.1007/s11605-015-2865-5
  8. Fujiwara Y, 2015, ANTICANCER RES, V35, P499
  9. Lee DY, 2014, AM J SURG, V207, P540, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.042
  10. Lightner AM, 2004, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V198, P697, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.12.023
  11. MACHADO MCC, 1976, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V143, P271
  12. Makary MA, 2006, J GASTROINTEST SURG, V10, P347, DOI 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.12.014
  13. Melis M, 2012, HPB, V14, P583, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00484.x
  14. Okano K, 2015, BRIT J SURG, V102, P1551, DOI 10.1002/bjs.9919
  15. Pecorelli N, 2016, BRIT J SURG, V103, P434, DOI 10.1002/bjs.10063
  16. Prashant S, 2012, HPB, V14, P649, DOI 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00506.x
  17. Riall Taylor S, 2009, Adv Surg, V43, P233
  18. Sulpice L, 2012, J SURG RES, V178, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.075
  19. Tani M, 2009, J HEPATO-BILIARY-PAN, V16, P675, DOI 10.1007/s00534-009-0106-6
  20. Tranchart H, 2012, ANN SURG, V256, P139, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256c32c
  21. van Heek NT, 2005, ANN SURG, V242, P781, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000188462.00249.36
  22. Wente MN, 2007, SURGERY, V142, P761, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
  23. Yermilov I, 2009, ANN SURG ONCOL, V16, P554, DOI 10.1245/s10434-008-0178-6