On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients older than 60 years: five-year follow-up of MASS III trial
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
5
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Editora
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Indexadores
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Métricas da Revista
Autor de Grupo de pesquisa
Editores
Coordenadores
Organizadores
Citação
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, v.9, article ID 136, 5p, 2014
Resumo
Background: We aim to evaluate in-hospital events and long-term clinical outcomes in patients over 60 years of age with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: The MASS III was a single-center randomized trial that evaluate 308 patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function assigned for: 155 to off-pump and 153 to on-pump CABG. Of this, 176 (58.3%) patients were 60 years or older at the time of randomization (90 of-pump and 86 on-pump). The primary short-term end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and overall mortality occurring within 30 days after surgery or before discharge, whichever was later. The primary long-term end point was death from any cause within 5 years, non-fatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 5 years, or additional revascularization between 30 days and 5 years. Results: On-pump CABG had a higher incidence of 30-day composite outcome than off-pump CABG (15,1% and 5.6%, respectively; P = 0.036). However, after the multivariate analysis, this association lost statistical significance, P = 0.05. After 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between both strategies of CABG in the composite end points 16.7% and 15.1%; Hazard Ratio 1.07; CI 0.41 - 1.82; P = 0.71, for off-pump and on-pump CABG respectively. Conclusions: On-pump and off-pump CABG achieved similar results of combined events at short-term and 5-year follow-up.
Palavras-chave
Coronary artery disease, Coronary artery bypass grafts, CABG, Cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB
Referências
- Alexander KP, 2000, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V35, P731, DOI 10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00606-3
- Athanasiou T, 2004, ANN THORAC SURG, V77, P745, DOI 10.1016/j.athorascur.2003.07.002
- Boyd WD, 1999, ANN THORAC SURG, V68, P1490, DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00951-0
- Cleveland JC, 2001, ANN THORAC SURG, V72, P1282, DOI 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03006-5
- Diegeler A, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P1189, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666
- Hedeshian MH, 2002, SURGERY, V132, P239, DOI 10.1067/msy.2002.125388
- Hornero F, 2013, EUR J CARDIO-THORAC, P1
- Houlind K, 2012, CIRCULATION, V125, P2431, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.052571
- Hueb W, 2010, CIRCULATION, V122, pS48, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924258
- Hueb W, 2008, TRIALS, V9, DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-9-52
- Ivanov J, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P673
- Lamy A, 2013, NEW ENGL J MED, V368, P1179, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1301228
- Natarajan A, 2007, POSTGRAD MED J, V83, P154, DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2006.049742
- Puskas JD, 2003, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V125, P797, DOI 10.1067/mtc.2003.324
- Sharony R, 2003, CIRCULATION, V108, P15, DOI 10.1161/01.cir.0000087448.65888.21
- Shroyer AL, 2009, NEW ENGL J MED, V361, P1827, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905
- Thygesen K, 2012, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V60, P1581, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001
- VANSWIETEN JC, 1988, STROKE, V19, P604