Probable 4-Repeat Tauopathy Criteria Predict Brain Amyloid Negativity, Distinct Clinical Features, and FDG-PET/MRI Neurodegeneneration Patterns in Corticobasal Syndrome
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Citação
MOVEMENT DISORDERS CLINICAL PRACTICE, v.11, n.3, p.238-247, 2024
Resumo
BackgroundCorticobasal syndrome (CBS) is associated with diverse underlying pathologies, including the four-repeat (4R)-tauopathies. The Movement Disorders Society (MDS) criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) proposed the novel category ""probable 4R-tauopathy"" to address the phenotypic overlap between PSP and corticobasal degeneration (CBD).ObjectivesTo investigate the clinical ability of the MDS-PSP criteria for probable 4R-tauopathy in predicting a negative amyloid-PET in CBS. Additionally, this study aims to explore CBS patients classified as 4R-tauopathy concerning their clinical features and neuroimaging degeneration patterns.MethodsThirty-two patients with probable CBS were prospectively evaluated and split into those who fulfilled or did not fulfill the 4R-tauopathy criteria (CBS-4RT+ vs. CBS-4RT-). All patients underwent positron emission tomographies (PET) with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and [11C]Pittsburgh Compound-B (PIB) on a hybrid PET-MRI scanner to perform multimodal quantitative comparisons with a control group.ResultsEleven patients were clinically classified as CBS-4RT+, and only one had a positive PIB-PET. The CBS-4RT+ classification had 92% specificity, 52% sensitivity, and 69% accuracy in predicting a negative PIB-PET. The CBS-4RT+ group presented with dysarthria and perseveration more often than the CBS-4RT- group. Moreover, the CBS-4RT+ group showed a prominent frontal hypometabolism extending to the supplementary motor area and striatum, and brain atrophy at the anterior cingulate and bilateral striata.ConclusionsThe 4R-tauopathy criteria were highly specific in predicting a negative amyloid-PET in CBS. Patients classified as 4R-tauopathy presented distinct clinical aspects, as well as brain metabolism and atrophy patterns previously associated with tauopathies.
Palavras-chave
tauopathies, corticobasal syndrome, progressive supranuclear palsy, positron emission tomography, amyloid PET
Referências
- Alexander SK, 2014, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V85, P923, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307035
- Armstrong MJ, 2013, NEUROLOGY, V80, P496, DOI 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1
- Boeve BF, 2003, ANN NEUROL, V54, pS15, DOI 10.1002/ana.10570
- Boxer AL, 2019, LANCET NEUROL, V18, P549, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30139-5
- Brendel M, 2020, JAMA NEUROL, V77, P1408, DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2526
- Brucki SMD, 2003, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V61, P777, DOI 10.1590/S0004-282X2003000500014
- Burrell JR, 2014, MOVEMENT DISORD, V29, P684, DOI 10.1002/mds.25872
- Cassidy Adam, 2016, Pract Neurol, V16, P317, DOI 10.1136/practneurol-2015-001354
- Cerami C, 2020, J ALZHEIMERS DIS, V76, P517, DOI 10.3233/JAD-200153
- César KG, 2017, INT PSYCHOGERIATR, V29, P1345, DOI 10.1017/S1041610217000734
- Coutinho AM, 2020, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V47, P2666, DOI 10.1007/s00259-020-04714-0
- Cummings JL, 1997, NEUROLOGY, V48, pS10, DOI 10.1212/WNL.48.5_Suppl_6.10S
- Della Rosa PA, 2014, NEUROINFORMATICS, V12, P575, DOI 10.1007/s12021-014-9235-4
- Faria DD, 2019, BRAZ J PSYCHIAT, V41, P101, DOI 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-0002
- Goetz CG, 2004, MOVEMENT DISORD, V19, P1020, DOI 10.1002/mds.20213
- Grimm MJ, 2019, MOVEMENT DISORD, V34, P1228, DOI 10.1002/mds.27666
- Höglinger GU, 2021, LANCET NEUROL, V20, P182, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30489-0
- Höglinger GU, 2018, MOV DISORD CLIN PRAC, V5, P141, DOI 10.1002/mdc3.12582
- Höglinger GU, 2017, MOVEMENT DISORD, V32, P853, DOI 10.1002/mds.26987
- Horie K, 2022, NAT MED, V28, P2547, DOI 10.1038/s41591-022-02075-9
- HUGHES CP, 1982, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V140, P566, DOI 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566
- Jabbari E, 2020, JAMA NEUROL, V77, P377, DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4347
- Josephs KA, 2008, NEUROBIOL AGING, V29, P280, DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.019
- Koga S, 2022, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V93, P919, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328586
- Lee SE, 2011, ANN NEUROL, V70, P327, DOI 10.1002/ana.22424
- Ling HL, 2010, BRAIN, V133, P2045, DOI 10.1093/brain/awq123
- Litvan I, 2023, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V94, P330, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330564
- Mathew R, 2012, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V83, P405, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300875
- Mathew R, 2011, DEMENT GERIATR COGN, V31, P254, DOI 10.1159/000327169
- NITRINI R, 1987, Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, V45, P29
- Olfati N., 2022, FRONT NEUROL, V14
- Ouchi H, 2014, MOVEMENT DISORD, V29, P238, DOI 10.1002/mds.25746
- Palleis C, 2021, MOVEMENT DISORD, V36, P2104, DOI 10.1002/mds.28624
- Pardini M, 2019, NEUROLOGY, V92, pE1121, DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007038
- Parmera JB, 2021, MOVEMENT DISORD, V36, P651, DOI 10.1002/mds.28373
- Parmera Jacy Bezerra, 2016, Dement. neuropsychol., V10, P267
- Parmera JB., 2021, FRONT NEUROL, V12, P1
- Peterson KA, 2021, J NEUROL, V268, P796, DOI 10.1007/s00415-019-09463-1
- PFEFFER RI, 1982, J GERONTOL, V37, P323, DOI 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323
- Respondek G, 2020, MOVEMENT DISORD, V35, P171, DOI 10.1002/mds.27872
- Rittman T, 2013, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V84, P544, DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303618
- Rivaud-Péchoux S, 2000, NEUROLOGY, V54, P1029, DOI 10.1212/WNL.54.5.1029
- Robinson JL, 2020, J NEUROPATH EXP NEUR, V79, P296, DOI 10.1093/jnen/nlz141
- Robinson JL, 2018, BRAIN, V141, P2181, DOI 10.1093/brain/awy146
- Santos-Santos MA, 2016, JAMA NEUROL, V73, P733, DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0412
- Shelley BP, 2009, MOVEMENT DISORD, V24, P1593, DOI 10.1002/mds.22558
- Stamelou M, 2021, NAT REV NEUROL, V17, P601, DOI 10.1038/s41582-021-00541-5
- Whitwell JL, 2020, NEUROIMAGE-CLIN, V25, DOI 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102152
- Yamane T, 2017, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V44, P850, DOI 10.1007/s00259-016-3591-2
- Yassuda Mônica Sanches, 2017, Dement. neuropsychol., V11, P48, DOI 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010008
- Zalewski N, 2014, J NEUROL, V261, P710, DOI 10.1007/s00415-014-7256-4