How to Distinguish Best Evidence from Bias: A Basic Guide to Understanding a Systematic Review

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorCAMARGO, Cristina Pires
dc.contributor.authorGEMPERLI, Rolf
dc.contributor.authorROHRICH, Rod J.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T13:17:44Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T13:17:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractA systematic review is a powerful tool to synthesize and show concise and robust evidence for clinical practice. Thus, the inclusion of biased, low-quality studies should be avoided, for otherwise, the resulting systematic review will not reflect the best medical evidence. Because the methodology of systematic review is relatively new, this review aims to present basic rules to guide the reader's interpretation of a systematic review.eng
dc.description.indexPubMedeng
dc.identifier.citationPLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, v.8, n.2, article ID e2625, 8p, 2020
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/GOX.0000000000002625
dc.identifier.issn2169-7574
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/36647
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSeng
dc.relation.ispartofPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINSeng
dc.subject.otherqualityeng
dc.subject.otherreadeng
dc.subject.wosSurgeryeng
dc.titleHow to Distinguish Best Evidence from Bias: A Basic Guide to Understanding a Systematic Revieweng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryrevieweng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryEstados Unidos
hcfmusp.affiliation.countryisous
hcfmusp.author.externalROHRICH, Rod J.:Dallas Plast Surg Inst, Dallas, TX USA
hcfmusp.citation.scopus0
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcCRISTINA PIRES CAMARGO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcROLF GEMPERLI
hcfmusp.description.articlenumbere2625
hcfmusp.description.issue2
hcfmusp.description.volume8
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed32309077
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85083850852
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000532296300013
hcfmusp.publisher.cityPHILADELPHIAeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAkobeng AK, 2005, ARCH DIS CHILD, V90, P845, DOI 10.1136/adc.2004.058230eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1999, GREY LIT REPeng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 1984, LATIN AM CARIBBEAN Ceng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2015, COCHRANE CENTRAL REGeng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2011, OP GREY REPeng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2004, EU CLIN TRIALS REGeng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], 2000, INT STANDARD RANDOMIeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAslam AA, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012040.pub2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBerlin JA, 1994, ONLINE J CURR CLIN Teng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBorenstein M, 2008, INTRO METAANALYSISeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCollier R, 2015, CAN MED ASSOC J, V187, P640, DOI 10.1503/cmaj.109-5072eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDowns SH, 1998, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V52, P377, DOI 10.1136/jech.52.6.377eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEl-Kadiki A, 2005, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V330, P871, DOI 10.1136/bmj.38399.495648.8Feng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceEmbase, 1974, EXC MED DAT OVIDeng
hcfmusp.relation.reference<ext-link ext-link-type = uri xmlns:xlink = http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink xlink:href = InformedHealth.org>InformedHealth.org</ext-link>, 2016, WHAT AR SYST REV METeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreenhalgh T, 1997, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V315, P243, DOI 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.243eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGUYATT G, 1992, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V268, P2420, DOI 10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHiggins JPT, 2004, STAT MED, V23, P1663, DOI 10.1002/sim.1752eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHiggins JPT, 2011, COCHRANE COLLABORATI, DOI 10.1002/9780470712184eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHiggins JPT, 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, DOI 10.1136/bmj.d5928eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHiggins JPT, 2009, J R STAT SOC A STAT, V172, P137, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.xeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJadad AR, 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKuss O, 2010, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V140, P829, DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.022eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLiberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b2700eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoher D, 2010, INT J SURG, V8, P336, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMontgomery P, 2019, BMJ GLOB HEALTH, V4, DOI 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000848eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNational Institutes of Health, PUBMEDeng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePaez Arsenio, 2017, J Evid Based Med, V10, P233, DOI 10.1111/jebm.12266eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceROSENBAUM PR, 1983, BIOMETRIKA, V70, P41, DOI 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRyan R, 2016, GRADE QUALITY EVIDENeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSACKETT DL, 1981, CAN MED ASSOC J, V124, P555eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSedgwick P., 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V346, pf1816eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceShamseer L, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V349, DOI [10.1136/bmj.i4086, 10.1136/bmj.g7647]eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSMITH R, 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V348, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.G371eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceStavrou A, 2014, INTERACT CARDIOV TH, V18, P121, DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivt451eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSterne JAC, 2016, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V355, DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4919eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWells G, 2008, NEWCASTLE OTTAWA SCAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWorld Health Organization, 2018, INT STAND CLIN TRIALeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYUSUF S, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V266, P93, DOI 10.1001/jama.266.1.93eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZhang LJ, 2018, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V88, P139, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.001eng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-10
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2863cf5c-c0ec-476b-86b7-056bd5ea9a42
relation.isAuthorOfPublication121f80ff-64a7-415e-9ec6-80a0902bda87
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2863cf5c-c0ec-476b-86b7-056bd5ea9a42
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_CAMARGO_How_to_Distinguish_Best_Evidence_from_Bias_A_2020.PDF
Tamanho:
841.59 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)
Baixar
Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04