Accuracy of frozen section in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
dc.contributor.authorGARCIA, Mila Trementosa
dc.contributor.authorMOTA, Bruna Salani
dc.contributor.authorCARDOSO, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorMARTIMBIANCO, Ana Luiza Cabrera
dc.contributor.authorRICCI, Marcos Desiderio
dc.contributor.authorCARVALHO, Filomena Marino
dc.contributor.authorGONCALVES, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSOARES JUNIOR, Jose Maria
dc.contributor.authorFILASSI, Jose Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-17T13:55:58Z
dc.date.available2021-06-17T13:55:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives It is well established that tumor-free margin is an important factor for reducing local recurrence and reoperation rates. This systematic review with meta-analysis of frozen section intraoperative margin assessment aims to evaluate the accuracy, and reoperation and survival rates, and to establish its importance in breast-conserving surgery. Methods A thorough review was conducted in all online publication-databases for the related literature up to March 2020. MeSH terms used: ""Breast Cancer"", ""Segmental Mastectomy"" and ""Frozen Section"". We included the studies that evaluated accuracy of frozen section, reoperation and survival rates. To ensure quality of the included articles, the QUADAS-2 tool (adapted) was employed. The assessment of publication bias by graphical and statistical methods was performed using the funnel plot and the Egger's test. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019125682). Results Nineteen studies were deemed suitable, with a total of 6,769 cases. The reoperation rate on average was 5.9%. Sensitivity was 0.81, with a Confidence Interval of 0.79-0.83, p = 0.0000, I2 = 95.1%, and specificity was 0.97, with a Confidence Interval of 0.97-0.98, p = 0.0000, I-2 = 90.8%, for 17 studies and 5,615 cases. Accuracy was 0.98. Twelve studies described local recurrence and the highest cumulative recurrence rate in 3 years was 7.5%. The quality of the included studies based on the QUADAS-2 tool showed a low risk of bias. There is no publication bias (p = 0.32) and the funnel plot showed symmetry. Conclusion Frozen section is a reliable procedure with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in intraoperative margin assessment of breast-conserving surgery. Therefore, this modality of margin assessment could be useful in reducing reoperation rates.eng
dc.description.indexMEDLINEeng
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE, v.16, n.3, article ID e0248768, 15p, 2021
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0248768
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/40834
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEeng
dc.relation.ispartofPlos One
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.rights.holderCopyright PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCEeng
dc.subject.other20-year follow-upeng
dc.subject.othersurgical marginseng
dc.subject.otherlumpectomy marginseng
dc.subject.otherlocal recurrenceeng
dc.subject.otherconservation therapyeng
dc.subject.othercancereng
dc.subject.othermastectomyeng
dc.subject.otherreoperationeng
dc.subject.othercarcinomaeng
dc.subject.otherstageeng
dc.subject.wosMultidisciplinary Scienceseng
dc.titleAccuracy of frozen section in intraoperative margin assessment for breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysiseng
dc.typearticleeng
dc.type.categoryrevieweng
dc.type.versionpublishedVersioneng
dspace.entity.typePublication
hcfmusp.author.externalCARDOSO, Natalia:Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
hcfmusp.author.externalMARTIMBIANCO, Ana Luiza Cabrera:Univ Metropolitana Santos UNIMES, Grad Program Hlth & Environm, Santos, SP, Brazil
hcfmusp.citation.scopus20
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMILA TREMENTOSA GARCIA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcBRUNA SALANI MOTA
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcMARCOS DESIDERIO RICCI
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcFILOMENA MARINO CARVALHO
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcRODRIGO GONCALVES
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcJOSE MARIA SOARES JUNIOR
hcfmusp.contributor.author-fmusphcJOSE ROBERTO FILASSI
hcfmusp.description.articlenumbere0248768
hcfmusp.description.issue3
hcfmusp.description.volume16
hcfmusp.origemWOS
hcfmusp.origem.pubmed33735315
hcfmusp.origem.scopus2-s2.0-85102730333
hcfmusp.origem.wosWOS:000631029700082
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAN FRANCISCOeng
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAnila KR, 2016, INDIAN J CANCER, V53, P235, DOI 10.4103/0019-509X.197732eng
hcfmusp.relation.reference[Anonymous], RevMan 5 download | Cochrane Trainingeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBoughey JC, 2014, SURGERY, V156, P190, DOI 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.025eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCabioglu N, 2007, ANN SURG ONCOL, V14, P1458, DOI 10.1245/s10434-006-9236-0eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCaruso F, 2011, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V37, P871, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.07.002eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCendan JC, 2005, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V201, P194, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.014eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDener C, 2009, SCAND J SURG, V98, P34, DOI 10.1177/145749690909800107eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFisher B, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V347, P1233, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa022152eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFlasinski M, 2018, BLOOD ADV, V2, P1532, DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018018945eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGage I, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V78, P1921, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961101)78:9<1921::AID-CNCR12>3.0.CO;2-#eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGreen S, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMAeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHoussami N, 2014, ANN SURG ONCOL, V21, P717, DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIkeda T, 1997, SURG TODAY, V27, P207, DOI 10.1007/BF00941646eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJACOBSON JA, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V332, P907, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199504063321402eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJorns JM, 2017, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V43, P1273, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.01.237eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceJorns JM, 2014, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V142, P601, DOI 10.1309/AJCPRSOA2G8RLEXYeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKikuyama M, 2015, JPN J CLIN ONCOL, V45, P19, DOI 10.1093/jjco/hyu158eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKim MJ, 2016, BREAST CANCER-BASIC, V10, P205, DOI 10.4137/BCBCR.S40868eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKo S, 2017, J BREAST CANCER, V20, P176, DOI 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.2.176eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLeong C, 2004, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V100, P1823, DOI 10.1002/cncr.20153eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLurie RH., 2020, 2020 BREAST CANCeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoher D, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V151, P264, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMoran MS, 2014, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V88, P553, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.11.012eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMorrow M, 2017, JAMA ONCOL, V3, P1352, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0774eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNOGUCHI M, 1995, J SURG ONCOL, V60, P185, DOI 10.1002/jso.2930600309eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNowikiewicz T, 2019, SCI REP-UK, V9, DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-49951-yeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNunez A, 2020, SCI REP-UK, V10, DOI 10.1038/s41598-020-74373-6eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceObedian E, 2000, CANCER J, V6, P28eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOlson TP, 2007, ANN SURG ONCOL, V14, P2953, DOI 10.1245/s10434-007-9437-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceOsako T, 2015, INT J CLIN ONCOL, V20, P1093, DOI 10.1007/s10147-015-0827-2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePinotti JA, 2002, EUR J GYNAECOL ONCOL, V23, P11eng
hcfmusp.relation.referencePoggi MM, 2003, CANCER, V98, P697, DOI 10.1002/cncr.11580eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRiedl O, 2009, EJSO-EUR J SURG ONC, V35, P264, DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.05.007eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRusby JE, 2008, AM J SURG, V196, P512, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.026eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSAUTER ER, 1994, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V73, P2607, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940515)73:10<2607::AID-CNCR2820731023>3.0.CO;2-1eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSCHNITT SJ, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1746, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1746::AID-CNCR2820740617>3.0.CO;2-Yeng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSMITT MC, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V76, P259, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950715)76:2<259::AID-CNCR2820760216>3.0.CO;2-2eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSt John ER, 2017, ANN SURG, V265, P300, DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001897eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTaghian A, 2005, ANN SURG, V241, P629, DOI 10.1097/01.sla.0000157272.04803.1beng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceTan MP, 2014, INT J BREAST CANCER, V2014, DOI 10.1155/2014/715404eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceVeronesi U, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V347, P1227, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa020989eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWeber WP, 2008, WORLD J SURG, V32, P2599, DOI 10.1007/s00268-008-9757-8eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWeng EY, 2000, CANCER, V88, P1643, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000401)88:7<1643::AID-CNCR19>3.3.CO;2-Feng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWhiting PF, 2011, ANN INTERN MED, V155, P529, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWright MJ, 2007, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V204, P541, DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.031eng
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYang M, 2018, JAMA ONCOL, V4, P746, DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5227eng
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-05-11
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationce237cd9-26b4-4549-b5f0-6685ef18060c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication86012292-63e7-450f-ab65-f5049d4ee18d
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc80bbe0a-1980-4e94-be12-c84f93d64d17
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf8b678bd-e1f7-40a2-8a6a-2f167e778c94
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2b09ae7e-bf24-41ea-9c9b-82a4d189cc6a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication97160a48-cbb6-4137-9478-b35b77066d37
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf08d9ae5-8b79-4a27-b69a-332a89d272b9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryce237cd9-26b4-4549-b5f0-6685ef18060c
Arquivos
Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
art_GARCIA_Accuracy_of_frozen_section_in_intraoperative_margin_assessment_2021.PDF
Tamanho:
1.68 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição:
publishedVersion (English)