Proactive management of extreme prematurity: disagreement between obstetricians and neonatologists
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
34
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
Autores
GUINSBURG, R.
ALMEIDA, M. F. Branco de
MARBA, S. T. M.
RUGOLO, L. M. Suppo de Souza
LUZ, J. H.
LOPES, J. M. de Andrade
MARTINEZ, F. E.
PROCIANOY, R. S.
Citação
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, v.32, n.12, p.913-919, 2012
Resumo
Objective: To verify, in extremely preterm infants, if disagreement between obstetricians and neonatologists regarding proactive management is associated with early death. Study Design: Prospective cohort of 484 infants with 23(0/7) to 26(6/7) weeks, without malformations, born from January 2006 to December 2009 in eight Brazilian hospitals. Pro-active management was defined as indication of >= 1 dose of antenatal steroid or cesarean section (obstetrician) and resuscitation at birth according to the international guidelines (neonatologist). Main outcome was neonatal death in the first 24 h of life. Result: Obstetricians and neonatologists disagreed in 115 (24%) patients: only neonatologists were proactive in 107 of them. Disagreement between professionals increased 2.39 times the chance of death in the first day (95% confidence interval 1.40 to 4.09), adjusted for center and maternal/neonatal clinical conditions. Conclusion: In infants with 23 to 26 weeks of gestation, disagreement between obstetricians and neonatologists, translated as lack of antenatal steroids and/or vaginal delivery, despite resuscitation procedures, increases the odds of death in the first day. Journal of Perinatology (2012) 32, 913-919; doi:10.1038/jp.2012.28; published online 29 March 2012
Palavras-chave
fetal viability, steroids, cesarean section, infant newborn, neonatal mortality
Referências
- Almeida Maria Fernanda Branco de, 2008, J Pediatr (Rio J), V84, P300, DOI 10.2223/JPED.1787
- Kattwinkel J, 2006, PEDIATRICS, V117, pE1029, DOI 10.1542/peds.2006-0349
- Bader D, 2010, PEDIATRICS, V125, P696, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-1607
- BALLARD JL, 1991, J PEDIATR, V119, P417, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)82056-6
- Batton DG, 2009, PEDIATRICS, V124, P422, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-1060
- Been JV, 2011, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V118, P113, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02751.x
- Chan KL, 2006, EUR J OBSTET GYN R B, V128, P142, DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.012
- de Leeuw R, 2000, J PEDIATR, V137, P608, DOI 10.1067/mpd.2000.109144
- Devender R, 2011, COCHRANE LIB, V06
- Fishman SG, 2012, SEMIN FETAL NEONAT M, V17, P46, DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2011.09.002
- Jolly MC, 2000, OBSTET GYNECOL, V96, P962, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)01075-9
- Khan RA, 2009, ACTA PAEDIATR, V98, P1456, DOI 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01400.x
- Kollee LAA, 2009, BJOG-INT J OBSTET GY, V116, P1481, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02235.x
- Lee HC, 2006, OBSTET GYNECOL, V107, P97, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000192400.31757.a6
- Malloy MH, 2008, PEDIATRICS, V122, P285, DOI 10.1542/peds.2007-2620
- Manktelow BN, 2010, ARCH DIS CHILD-FETAL, V95, pF95, DOI 10.1136/adc.2009.170340
- Mori R, 2011, J PEDIATR-US, V159, P110, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.039
- Morse SB, 2000, PEDIATRICS, V105, P1046, DOI 10.1542/peds.105.5.1046
- Mwansa-Kambafwile J, 2010, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V39, P122, DOI 10.1093/ije/dyq029
- Perlman JM, 2010, CIRCULATION, V122, P8516, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971127
- Pignotti MS, 2008, PEDIATRICS, V121, pE193, DOI 10.1542/peds.2007-0513
- Shah PS, 2009, J PERINATOL, V29, P655, DOI 10.1038/jp.2009.71
- Skupski DW, 2010, J PERINAT MED, V38, P579, DOI 10.1515/JPM.2010.098
- Stoll BJ, 2010, PEDIATRICS, V126, P443, DOI 10.1542/peds.2009-2959
- Tyson JE, 2008, NEW ENGL J MED, V358, P1672, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa073059
- Wilkinson AR, 2009, ARCH DIS CHILD-FETAL, V94, pF2, DOI 10.1136/adc.2008.143321