Cycling-off modes during pressure support ventilation: Effects on breathing pattern, patient effort, and comfort

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2014
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
Autores
HOFF, Fabricia C.
SANTOS, Laura J.
VICTORINO, Josue A.
Citação
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, v.29, n.3, p.380-385, 2014
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: Expiratory asynchrony during pressure support ventilation (PSV) has been recognized as a cause of patient discomfort, increased workload, and impaired weaning process. We evaluated breathing pattern, patient comfort, and patient effort during PSV comparing 2 flow termination criteria: fixed at 5% of peak inspiratory flow vs automatic, real-time, breath-by-breath adjustment within the range of 5% to 55%. Materials and methods: Randomized crossover clinical trial. Sixteen awake patients, in the process of weaning, under PSV for more than 24 hours were subjected to 3 phases of PSV, each lasting 1 hour and using 1 of the 2 aforementioned termination criteria. Results: Effective pressure support during automatic adjustment (AA) was 12.5 +/- 3.2 cm H2O vs 12.5 +/- 3.9 cm H2O (P =. 9) with the fixed termination criterion, and external positive end-expiratory pressure was 6.2 +/- 1.8 vs 6.8 +/- 2 (P < .05). The effective termination criterion was higher during AA (31% [23-39] vs 12% [6-23]; P < .01), but without producing premature breath terminations. Pressure overshoots and alternative cycling-off were also decreased. Throughout the AA period, we observed a higher respiratory rate (24 +/- 8 breaths/min vs 19 +/- 6 breaths/min; P < .001), lower tidal volume (484 +/- 88 mL vs 518 +/- 102 mL; P b.001), and shorter inspiratory times (1.0 +/- 0.3 seconds vs 1.3 +/- 0.3 seconds; P < .001). Automatic adjustment was associated with lower airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 second (P < 0.1) (1.8 +/- 0.9 cm H2O vs 2.4 +/- 1 cm H2O; P < .01), lower pressure-time product to trigger the ventilator, and lower subjective discomfort (visual analog scale, 3.7 +/- 1.3 vs 4.5 +/- 1.2; P < .001). Conclusions: When compared with a fixed termination criterion, the use of a variable, real-time-adjusted termination criterion improved some indices of patient-ventilator synchrony, producing better breathing pattern, less discomfort, and slightly lower patient effort during PSV.
Palavras-chave
Pressure support ventilation, Cycling-off criteria, Patient ventilator interaction, Patient comfort
Referências
  1. ALBERTI A, 1995, INTENS CARE MED, V21, P547, DOI 10.1007/BF01700158
  2. Al-Majed SI, 2004, CRIT CARE, V8, pR398, DOI 10.1186/cc2954
  3. BLAND JM, 1995, BRIT MED J, V310, P446
  4. Bonmarchand G, 1996, INTENS CARE MED, V22, P1147, DOI 10.1007/BF01709328
  5. Bonmarchand G, 1999, CRIT CARE MED, V27, P715, DOI 10.1097/00003246-199904000-00023
  6. Chao DC, 1997, CHEST, V112, P1592, DOI 10.1378/chest.112.6.1592
  7. Chiumello D, 2007, CRIT CARE MED, V35, P2547, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000287594.80110.34
  8. Chiumello D, 2003, CRIT CARE MED, V31, P2604, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000089939.11032.36
  9. Corne S, 1997, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V156, P304
  10. Du H L, 2001, Respir Care Clin N Am, V7, P503, DOI 10.1016/S1078-5337(05)70046-0
  11. Giannouli E, 1999, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V159, P1716
  12. Hedenstierna G, 2012, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V78, P959
  13. Iotti Giorgio A., 1996, Critical Care Medicine, V24, P771, DOI 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00008
  14. Laghi F, 2001, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V163, P1365
  15. Laghi F, 2012, MINERVA ANESTESIOL, V78, P201
  16. Laghi F, 1999, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V160, P1766
  17. Mols G, 2000, CRIT CARE MED, V28, P1940, DOI 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00042
  18. MURCIANO D, 1982, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V126, P837
  19. Palo A., 1992, Acta Anaesthesiologica Italica, V43, P382
  20. Prinianakis G, 2008, INTENS CARE MED, V34, P70, DOI 10.1007/s00134-007-0879-5
  21. Tassaux D, 2004, CRIT CARE MED, V32, P1844, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000138561.11634.6F
  22. Tassaux D, 2005, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V172, P1283, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200407-880OC
  23. Thille AW, 2008, INTENS CARE MED, V34, P1477, DOI 10.1007/s00134-008-1121-9
  24. Thille AW, 2006, INTENS CARE MED, V32, P1515, DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0301-8
  25. TOBIN MJ, 1986, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V134, P1111
  26. Tokioka H, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P161
  27. TUXEN DV, 1987, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V136, P872
  28. Vitacca M, 2004, CHEST, V126, P851, DOI 10.1378/chest.126.3.851
  29. Vovk A, 2007, J APPL PHYSIOL, V103, P779, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01185.2006
  30. Yamada Y, 2000, J APPL PHYSIOL, V88, P2143