Diagnostic Criteria for Somatosensory Tinnitus: A Delphi Process and Face-to-Face Meeting to Establish Consensus

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MICHIELS_Diagnostic_Criteria_for_Somatosensory_Tinnitus_A_Delphi_Process_2018.PDF (567.08 KB)
Citações na Scopus
48
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Autores
MICHIELS, Sarah
ORON, Yahav
GILLES, Annick
HAIDER, Haula F.
ERLANDSSON, Soly
BECHTER, Karl
VIELSMEIER, Veronika
BIESINGER, Eberhard
NAM, Eui-Cheol
Citação
TRENDS IN HEARING, v.22, article ID 2331216518796400, 10p, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Since somatic or somatosensory tinnitus (ST) was first described as a subtype of subjective tinnitus, where altered somatosensory afference from the cervical spine or temporomandibular area causes or changes a patient's tinnitus perception, several studies in humans and animals have provided a neurophysiological explanation for this type of tinnitus. Due to a lack of unambiguous clinical tests, many authors and clinicians use their own criteria for diagnosing ST. This resulted in large differences in prevalence figures in different studies and limits the comparison of clinical trials on ST treatment. This study aimed to reach an international consensus on diagnostic criteria for ST among experts, scientists and clinicians using a Delphi survey and face-to-face consensus meeting strategy. Following recommended procedures to gain expert consensus, a two-round Delphi survey was delivered online, followed by an in-person consensus meeting. Experts agreed upon a set of criteria that strongly suggest ST. These criteria comprise items on somatosensory modulation, specific tinnitus characteristics, and symptoms that can accompany the tinnitus. None of these criteria have to be present in every single patient with ST, but in case they are present, they strongly suggest the presence of ST. Because of the international nature of the survey, we expect these criteria to gain wide acceptance in the research field and to serve as a guideline for clinicians across all disciplines. Criteria developed in this consensus paper should now allow further investigation of the extent of somatosensory influence in individual tinnitus patients and tinnitus populations.
Palavras-chave
tinnitus, somatic, somatosensory, Delphi survey, face-to-face consensus
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/29502
Referências
  1. Abel MD, 2004, CRANIO, V22, P181, DOI 10.1179/crn.2004.024
  2. Baguley D, 2013, LANCET, V382, P1600, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7
  3. Bechter K, 2016, FRONT PSYCHIATRY, V7, DOI 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00043
  4. Biesinger E, 2015, HNO, V63, P266, DOI 10.1007/s00106-014-2971-9
  5. Bosel C, 2008, HNO, V56, P707, DOI 10.1007/s00106-007-1602-0
  6. Buergers R, 2014, J PROSTHET DENT, V111, P222, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.001
  7. ERLANDSSON S I, 1991, British Journal of Audiology, V25, P151, DOI 10.3109/03005369109079849
  8. Fackrell K, 2017, TRIALS, V18, DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2123-0
  9. Guyatt GH, 2011, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V64, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012
  10. Haider HF, 2017, FRONT NEUROSCI-SWITZ, V11, DOI 10.3389/fnins.2017.00207
  11. Harvey N, 2012, INT J NURS PRACT, V18, P188, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02017.x
  12. Hiller W, 1997, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V43, P613, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3999(97)00188-8
  13. Kapoula Z, 2010, AURIS NASUS LARYNX, V37, P314, DOI 10.1016/j.anl.2009.10.004
  14. Keeney S, 2001, INT J NURS STUD, V38, P195, DOI 10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4
  15. Landgrebe M, 2012, J PSYCHOSOM RES, V73, P112, DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.05.002
  16. Lanting CP, 2010, HEARING RES, V267, P78, DOI 10.1016/j.heares.2010.04.006
  17. Levine RA, 1999, AM J OTOLARYNG, V20, P351, DOI 10.1016/S0196-0709(99)90074-1
  18. Levine RA, 2003, EXP BRAIN RES, V153, P643, DOI 10.1007/s00221-003-1747-3
  19. Levine Robert A, 2015, Handb Clin Neurol, V129, P409, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00023-8
  20. Levine Robert Aaron, 2008, Trends Amplif, V12, P242, DOI 10.1177/1084713808321185
  21. McCormack A, 2016, HEARING RES, V337, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009
  22. Michiels S, 2017, MUSCULOSKEL SCI PRAC, V29, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.02.008
  23. Michiels S, 2015, OTOL NEUROTOL, V36, P741, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000670
  24. Ostermann K, 2016, B-ENT, V12, P59
  25. Peroz I, 2003, HNO, V51, P544, DOI 10.1007/s00106-002-0750-5
  26. Pinchoff RJ, 1998, AM J OTOL, V19, P785
  27. Ralli M, 2017, J INT MED RES, V45, P933, DOI 10.1177/0300060517707673
  28. Ralli M, 2016, AUDIOL NEURO-OTOL, V21, P372, DOI 10.1159/000452472
  29. Sanchez TG, 2011, CLINICS, V66, P1089, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322011000600028
  30. Shore SE, 2011, HEARING RES, V281, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.001
  31. Shore S, 2007, PROG BRAIN RES, V166, P107, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66010-5
  32. Simmons Richard, 2008, Seminars in Hearing, V29, P361, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1095895
  33. Tullberg M, 2006, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND, V64, P89, DOI 10.1080/00016350500377842
  34. Vielsmeier V, 2012, PLOS ONE, V7, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038887
  35. Ward J, 2015, PLOS ONE, V10, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0126254
  36. Won JY, 2013, AUDIOL NEURO-OTOL, V18, P261, DOI 10.1159/000351685
  37. Zhan XP, 2006, J COMP NEUROL, V496, P335, DOI 10.1002/cne.20917

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOF
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/32