Time to change focus? Transitioning from higher neonatal to higher stillbirth mortality in Sao Paulo State, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.12, n.12, article ID e0190060, 13p, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Differential trends in mortality suggest that stillbirths may dominate neonatal mortality in the medium to long run. Brazil has made major efforts to improve data collection on health indicators at granular geographic levels, and provides an ideal environment to test this hypothesis. Our goals were to examine levels and trends in stillbirths and neonatal deaths and the extent to which the mortality burden caused by stillbirths dominates neonatal mortality at the municipality-and state-level. Methods We used data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health's repository on births, fetal, and neonatal deaths (2010 +/- 2014) to calculate stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates for Sao Paulo state's 645 municipalities. Results At the state level, 7.9 per 1000 pregnancies ended in stillbirth (fetal death >22 weeks gestation or fetal weight >500g), but this varied from 0.0 to 28.4 per 1000 across municipalities. 7.9 per 1000 live births also died within the first 28 days. 42% of municipalities had a higher stillbirth rate than neonatal mortality rate, and in 61% of areas with low neonatal mortality (<8.0 per 1000), stillbirth rates exceeded neonatal mortality rates. Conclusions This analysis suggests large variability and inequality in mortality outcomes at the sub-national level. The results also imply that stillbirth mortality may exceed neonatal mortality in Brazil and similar settings in the next few decades, which suggests a need for a shift in policy. This work further underscores the importance of continued research into causes and prevention of stillbirth.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Beringhs Evani Marzagão, 2008, Rev. Bras. Saude Mater. Infant., V8, P319, DOI 10.1590/S1519-38292008000300011
  2. Blencowe H, 2013, TROP MED INT HEALTH, V18, P303, DOI 10.1111/tmi.12048
  3. Blencowe H, 2016, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V4, pE98, DOI 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2
  4. De Lorenzi D R, 2001, Cad Saude Publica, V17, P141
  5. Departmento de Informatica do SUS, OB INF PART 1996 NOT
  6. Departmento de Informatica do SUS, SIM SIST INF MORT
  7. Barbeiro FMD, 2015, REV SAUDE PUBL, V49, DOI 10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005568
  8. Every Woman Every Child, 2015, GLOB STRAT WOM CHILD
  9. Froen JF, 2009, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V9, DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-9-58
  10. Goldenberg Robert L, 2015, Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol, V1, P3, DOI 10.1186/s40748-014-0004-z
  11. Goldenberg RL, 2012, INDIAN PEDIATR, V49, P187
  12. Joint Committee on Reducing Maternal and Neonatal Mortality in Indonesia, 2013, RED MAT NEON MORT IN
  13. LANDMANNSZWARCWALD, 2016, INT J EQUITY HEALTH, V15, DOI 10.1186/S12939-016-0462-1
  14. Lansky S, 2002, REV SAUDE PUBL, V36, P759, DOI [10.1590/S0034-89102002000700017, 10.1590/s0034-89102002000700017]
  15. Lawn JE, 2016, LANCET, V387, P587, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5
  16. Leisher SH, 2016, BMC PREGNANCY CHILDB, V16
  17. MacDorman M, 2013, NATL VITAL STAT REP, V64
  18. Vieira MSM, 2016, MATERN CHILD HLTH J, V20, P1634, DOI 10.1007/s10995-016-1962-8
  19. Silver RM, 2007, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V196, P433, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.041
  20. Smith GCS, 2007, LANCET, V370, P1715, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61723-1
  21. Smith GCS, 2010, CLIN OBSTET GYNECOL, V53, P597, DOI 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181eb64a6
  22. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, LEV TRENDS CHILD MOR
  23. Victora CG, 2011, LANCET, V377, P1863, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4
  24. Viellas EF, 2014, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V30, DOI 10.1590/0102-311X00126013
  25. World Health Organization, 2016, WHO NEGL TRAG STILLB
  26. World Health Organization, MAK EV BAB COUNT AUD
  27. World Health Organization, 2014, EV NEWB ACT PLAN END
  28. The World Bank Group, 2016, MORT RAT NEON PER 10
  29. Yakoob MY, 2010, SEMIN PERINATOL, V34, P387, DOI 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.010
  30. Zeitlin J, 2016, J EPIDEMIOL COMMUN H, V70, P609, DOI 10.1136/jech-2015-207013