Remote vs. face-to-face activities in the teaching of renal pathophysiology in the context of social isolation during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
Citação
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, v.47, n.4, p.788-795, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic forced medical schools around the world to adopt emergency remote learning as a resort to avoid interruption of courses. However, the effectiveness of online classes as an educational strategy has been questioned by medical educators and students. In a prospective observational study design, students enrolled in a renal physiology and pathophysiology course were exposed to either face-to-face or remote synchronous classes. Students taught online obtained significantly higher mean scores than the group who had in-person classes, both groups assessed with identical exams. Appropriate screening tests suggested that fraud is unlikely to have significantly influenced these results and that the observed differences in performance reflected increased learning by the remote group. These observations suggest that online classes can help to maintain the continuity of physiology and pathophysiology courses during periods of social isolation and may contribute to improving learning under normal conditions.
Palavras-chave
audiovisual aids, computer-assisted instruction, education, educational measurement, graduate
Referências
  1. Anderson L. W., 2001, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition), DOI 10.7771/1541-5015.1355
  2. Banna Jinan, 2015, J Online Learn Teach, V11, P249
  3. Brightwell R, 2004, Biosci Educ, V3, P1, DOI [10.3108/beej.2004.03000004, DOI 10.3108/BEEJ.2004.03000004]
  4. Chinelatto Lucas Albuquerque, 2020, Clinics, V75, pe2133, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2133
  5. Choules AP, 2007, POSTGRAD MED J, V83, P212, DOI 10.1136/pgmj.2006.054189
  6. Daniel J, 2012, J INTERACT MEDIA EDU, DOI 10.5334/2012-18
  7. del Rio C, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V323, P1039, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.1490
  8. Dendir S, 2020, COMPUT HUM BEHAV REP, V2, DOI 10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100033
  9. Dimitrov DM, 2020, MEAS-INTERDISCIP RES, V18, P111, DOI 10.1080/15366367.2020.1725733
  10. Dost S, 2020, BMJ OPEN, V10, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042378
  11. Durning SJ, 2016, ACAD MED, V91, P583, DOI 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000977
  12. Ellaway R, 2008, MED TEACH, V30, P455, DOI [10.1080/01421590802108331, 10.1080/01421590802108349]
  13. Feller M, 1994, Stud Educ Eval, V20, P235, DOI [10.1016/0191-491X(94)90010-8, DOI 10.1016/0191-491X(94)90010-8]
  14. Frye AW, 2012, MED TEACH, V34, pE288, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637
  15. Geyer R, 2005, Integrating UK and European Social Policy: the Complexity of Europeanisation
  16. Gordon CM, 2017, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V102, P1413, DOI 10.1210/jc.2017-00131
  17. Haladyna T. M., 2013, DEV VALIDATING TEST, DOI [10.4324/9780203850381, DOI 10.4324/9780203850381]
  18. Harmon OR, 2008, J ECON EDUC, V39, P116, DOI 10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125
  19. Hodges CB, 2023, EDUCAUSE Review
  20. Kaup S, 2020, INDIAN J OPHTHALMOL, V68, P1220, DOI 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1241_20
  21. Kirkpatrick J. D., 2016, Kirkpatrick's four levels of training evaluation
  22. Lunt M, 2015, RHEUMATOLOGY, V54, P1137, DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ket146
  23. Martin F, 2018, ONLINE LEARN, V22, P205, DOI 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
  24. Monaghan AM, 2020, J MED EDUC CURRIC DE, V7, DOI 10.1177/2382120520965255
  25. Pei LS, 2019, MED EDUC ONLINE, V24, DOI 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538
  26. R Core Team, 2020, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  27. Ranger J, 2020, FRONT PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568825
  28. Regmi K, 2020, BMC MED EDUC, V20, DOI 10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6
  29. Rose S, 2020, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V323, P2131, DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.5227
  30. Rowe M, 2012, MED TEACH, V34, pE216, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831
  31. Stoehr F, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0257394
  32. Tempski P, 2021, PLOS ONE, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0248627
  33. Tempski P, 2020, CLINICS, V75, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2020/e2206
  34. Tendeiro JN, 2016, J STAT SOFTW, V74, P1, DOI 10.18637/jss.v074.i05
  35. VANDERFLIER H, 1982, J CROSS CULT PSYCHOL, V13, P267, DOI 10.1177/0022002182013003001