High risk cohort study for psychiatric disorders in childhood: rationale, design, methods and preliminary results

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
138
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY-BLACKWELL
Autores
SALUM, Giovanni Abrahao
GADELHA, Ary
PAN, Pedro Mario
TAMANAHA, Ana Carina
JACKOWSKI, Andrea
Citação
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, v.24, n.1, p.58-73, 2015
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
The objective of this study is to present the rationale, methods, design and preliminary results from the High Risk Cohort Study for the Development of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders. We describe the sample selection and the components of each phases of the study, its instruments, tasks and procedures. Preliminary results are limited to the baseline phase and encompass: (i) the efficacy of the oversampling procedure used to increase the frequency of both child and family psychopathology; (ii) interrater reliability and (iii) the role of differential participation rate. A total of 9937 children from 57 schools participated in the screening procedures. From those 2512 (random =958; high risk =1554) were further evaluated with diagnostic instruments. The prevalence of any child mental disorder in the random strata and high-risk strata was 19.9% and 29.7%. The oversampling procedure was successful in selecting a sample with higher family rates of any mental disorders according to diagnostic instruments. Interrater reliability (kappa) for the main diagnostic instrument range from 0.72 (hyperkinetic disorders) to 0.84 (emotional disorders). The screening instrument was successful in selecting a sub-sample with high risk for developing mental disorders. This study may help advance the field of child psychiatry and ultimately provide useful clinical information.
Palavras-chave
longitudinal, development, genetics, psychiatry, cohort
Referências
  1. Amorim P, 1998, EUR PSYCHIAT, V13, P26, DOI 10.1016/S0924-9338(97)86748-X
  2. Anselmi L, 2010, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V45, P135, DOI 10.1007/s00127-009-0052-2
  3. Associacao Brasiliera de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP), 2010, CRITERIO DE CLASSIFI
  4. Bender L., 1938, A VISUAL MOTOR GESTA
  5. Bernstein DP, 1997, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V36, P340, DOI 10.1097/00004583-199703000-00012
  6. Bitsakou P, 2008, J NEURAL TRANSM, V115, P261, DOI 10.1007/s00702-007-0828-z
  7. Ellis L.K., 2001, POSTER PRESENTED AT
  8. Fan J, 2002, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V14, P340, DOI 10.1162/089892902317361886
  9. Figueiredo V.L.M., 2001, UMA ADAPTACAO BRASIL
  10. Fleitlich-Bilyk B, 2004, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V43, P727, DOI 10.1097/01.chi.0000120021.14101.ca
  11. Goodman A, 2011, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V46, P521, DOI 10.1007/s00127-010-0219-x
  12. Goodman R, 2000, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V41, P645, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2000.tb02345.x
  13. Goodman R, 2000, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V177, P534, DOI 10.1192/bjp.177.6.534
  14. Hogan AM, 2005, DEVELOPMENTAL SCI, V8, P525, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00444.x
  15. Isolan L, 2011, J ANXIETY DISORD, V25, P741, DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.03.015
  16. Ivanova M.Y., 2007, DIVISION, V36, P405, DOI [10.1080/15374410701444363, DOI 10.1080/15374410701444363]
  17. Kaufman J, 1997, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V36, P980, DOI 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021
  18. Kim-Cohen J, 2003, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V60, P709, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.709
  19. Konings M, 2006, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V114, P55, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00741.x
  20. Kuhn S, 2011, J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI, V23, P2147, DOI 10.1162/jocn.2010.21564
  21. Luria A.R., 1973, THE WORKING BRAIN AN
  22. Milne BJ, 2008, PSYCHOL MED, V38, P1793, DOI 10.1017/S0033291708003115
  23. Moffitt TE, 2007, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V64, P651, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.651
  24. Mogg K, 1997, BEHAV RES THER, V35, P297, DOI 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00109-X
  25. Moojen S., 2003, CONFIAS CONSCIENCIA
  26. Moos R.H., 1990, FAM PROCESS, V29, P209
  27. MOOS RH, 1990, FAM PROCESS, V29, P199, DOI 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00199.x
  28. PARKER G, 1990, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V25, P281, DOI 10.1007/BF00782881
  29. Pereira L.D., 1997, PROCESSAMENTO AUDITI
  30. Rey A., 1993, THE CLINICAL NEURO P, V7, P2
  31. Rosario-Campos MC, 2006, MOL PSYCHIATR, V11, P495, DOI 10.1038/sj.mp.4001798
  32. Sheehan DV, 1998, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V59, P22, DOI 10.4088/JCP.09m05305whi
  33. SONUGABARKE EJS, 1992, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V33, P1091, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00927.x
  34. Stein L.M., 1998, TDE TESTE DE DESEMPE
  35. TELLEGEN A, 1967, J CONSULT PSYCHOL, V31, P499, DOI 10.1037/h0024963
  36. Toplak ME, 2003, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V44, P888, DOI 10.1111/1469-7610.00173
  37. Toplak ME, 2005, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V100, P659, DOI 10.2466/PMS.100.3.659-675
  38. Vandierendonck A, 2004, BRIT J PSYCHOL, V95, P57, DOI 10.1348/000712604322779460
  39. Wechsler D., 2002, WISC III ESCALA DE I
  40. Weissman MM, 2000, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V57, P675, DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.57.7.675
  41. Wertzner H.F., 2000, ABFW TESTE DE LINGUA
  42. Yung AR, 2003, SCHIZOPHR RES, V60, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0920-9964(02)00167-6