Administration of an Anal Bulking Agent With Polyacrylate-Polyalcohol Copolymer Particles Versus Endoanal Electrical Stimulation With Biofeedback for the Management of Mild and Moderate Anal Incontinence: A Randomized Prospective Study

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2022
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
Citação
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, v.65, n.7, p.917-927, 2022
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
BACKGROUND: There are few treatment options for mild-to-moderate anal incontinence with isolated internal anal sphincter defects or anal incontinence without muscle damage. Less-invasive techniques are generally favored. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results between the use of an anal bulking agent with polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer particles and endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback in patients with mild or moderate anal incontinence. DESIGN: This was a prospective parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in an ambulatory setting at the Colorectal Physiology Service of the Hospital das Clinicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo. PATIENTS: This study included patients who had anal incontinence for >6 months with isolated internal anal sphincter muscle damage or absence of anatomical defects in the anorectal sphincter complex. INTERVENTIONS: Anal bulking agent and endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score, and the secondary outcome measures included quality of life, recommended procedures, and anorectal manometry. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in mean age, sex, BMI, stool consistency, and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (p = 0.20) at baseline. After 12 months, the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score was found to be significantly improved in patients treated with the bulking agent compared to those treated with electrical stimulation (mean, 6.2 vs 9.2; p = 0.002), though the anorectal manometry parameters did not change significantly. The mean anal Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score declined by 4.2 points in the bulking agent group compared to a decline of 0.8 in the electrical stimulation group (mean difference in decline: 3.4 points; 95% CI, 1.2-5.5). Quality-of life evaluation showed similar results between groups comparing baseline parameters with 12-month follow-up. LIMITATIONS: The short follow-up period of 1 year, atypical method of biofeedback, and unmatched baseline in some of the quality-of-life scales between the 2 groups limited this study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild or moderate anal incontinence, the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score significantly improved in the bulking agent with polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer group compared with the endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback group.
Palavras-chave
Anal bulking agent, Endoanal electrical stimulation, Anal incontinence, Internal anal sphincter, Quality of life
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/48411
Referências
  1. Altomare DF, 2008, DIS COLON RECTUM, V51, P432, DOI 10.1007/s10350-007-9170-7
  2. Bartlett L, 2011, DIS COLON RECTUM, V54, P846, DOI 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182148fef
  3. Bharucha AE, 2010, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V139, P1559, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.056
  4. Bordeianou L, 2008, COLORECTAL DIS, V10, P273, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01288.x
  5. Bordeianou LG, 2020, DIS COLON RECTUM, V63, P6, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001529
  6. Boselli AS, 2010, WORLD J SURG, V34, P815, DOI 10.1007/s00268-010-0392-9
  7. Byrne CM, 2007, DIS COLON RECTUM, V50, P417, DOI 10.1007/s10350-006-0846-1
  8. Ciconelli RM, 1999, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V39, P143, DOI 10.1590/S0482-50042010000300005
  9. Davis K, 2003, ALIMENT PHARM THER, V18, P237, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01668.x
  10. Dehli T, 2013, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V48, P302, DOI 10.3109/00365521.2012.758770
  11. Deutekom M, 2007, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V102, P351, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00927.x
  12. Ditah I, 2014, CLIN GASTROENTEROL H, V12, P636, DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.020
  13. Neto IJFC, 2017, OBES SURG, V27, P1822, DOI 10.1007/s11695-017-2559-z
  14. Hong KD, 2017, TECH COLOPROCTOL, V21, P203, DOI 10.1007/s10151-017-1593-0
  15. Landefeld CS, 2008, ANN INTERN MED, V148, P449, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00210
  16. Lee JT, 2015, DIS COLON RECTUM, V58, P352, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000290
  17. Lewis SJ, 1997, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V32, P920, DOI 10.3109/00365529709011203
  18. Liberman H, 2001, DIS COLON RECTUM, V44, P1567, DOI 10.1007/BF02234373
  19. MARCIO J, 1993, DIS COLON RECTUM, V36, P77
  20. Markland AD, 2010, DIS COLON RECTUM, V53, P1148, DOI 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d5da6c
  21. Markland AD, 2010, J AM GERIATR SOC, V58, P1341, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02908.x
  22. Mellgren A, 2014, NEUROGASTROENT MOTIL, V26, P1087, DOI 10.1111/nmo.12360
  23. Melville JL, 2005, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V193, P2071, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.018
  24. Meyer I, 2019, DIS COLON RECTUM, V62, P733, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001353
  25. Miner PB, 2004, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V126, pS8, DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.056
  26. Morris OJ, 2013, TECH COLOPROCTOL, V17, P517, DOI 10.1007/s10151-013-1000-4
  27. Naimy N, 2007, DIS COLON RECTUM, V50, P2040, DOI 10.1007/s10350-007-9075-5
  28. Nieto MD, 2015, INT UROGYNECOL J, V26, P1483, DOI 10.1007/s00192-015-2730-9
  29. Oliveira Lucia de, 2007, Rev bras. colo-proctol., V27, P167, DOI 10.1590/S0101-98802007000200006
  30. Paquette IM, 2015, DIS COLON RECTUM, V58, P623, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000397
  31. PESCATORI M, 1991, DIS COLON RECTUM, V34, P540, DOI 10.1007/BF02049891
  32. Ratto C, 2011, BRIT J SURG, V98, P1644, DOI 10.1002/bjs.7699
  33. Rosato G, 2015, DIS COLON RECTUM, V58, P241, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000300
  34. Terra MP, 2006, DIS COLON RECTUM, V49, P1149, DOI 10.1007/s10350-006-0569-3
  35. Tibaek S, 2013, INT UROGYNECOL J, V24, P1361, DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-2018-2
  36. Tjandra JJ, 2004, DIS COLON RECTUM, V47, P2138, DOI 10.1007/s10350-004-0760-3
  37. Turel FD, 2019, DIS COLON RECTUM, V62, P348, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001297
  38. Xu X, 2012, DIS COLON RECTUM, V55, P586, DOI 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823dfd6d
  39. Yusuf Sonia Ahlaim Ibrahim, 2004, Arq. Gastroenterol., V41, P202, DOI 10.1590/S0004-28032004000300013
  40. Zutshi M, 2010, INT J COLORECTAL DIS, V25, P277, DOI 10.1007/s00384-009-0830-z

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MGT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/35
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/57