Peripherally inserted central catheters are associated with lower risk of bloodstream infection compared with central venous catheters in paediatric intensive care patients: a propensity-adjusted analysis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
41
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, v.43, n.8, p.1097-1104, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is an important cause of complications in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) could be an alternative to central venous catheters (CVCs) and the effect of PICCs compared with CVCs on CLABSI prevention is unknown in PICUs. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether PICCs were associated with a protective effect for CLABSI when compared to CVCs in critically ill children. Methods: We have carried out a retrospective multicentre study in four PICUs in Sao Paulo, Brazil. We included patients aged 0-14 years, who needed a CVC or PICC during a PICU stay from January 2013 to December 2015. Our primary endpoint was CLABSI up to 30 days after catheter placement. We defined CLABSI based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Networks (NHSN) 2015 surveillance definitions. To account for potential confounders, we used propensity scores with inverse probability weighting. Results: A total of 1660 devices (922 PICCs and 738 CVCs) in 1255 children were included. The overall CLABSI incidence was 2.28 (95% CI 1.70-3.07)/1000 catheter-days. After covariate adjustment using propensity scores, CVCs were associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.20, 95% CI 1.05-4.61; p = 0.037) compared with PICCs. In a sensitivity analysis, CVCs remained associated with higher risk of CLABSI (adjHR 2.18, 95% CI 1.02-4.64; p = 0.044) after adding place of insertion and use of parenteral nutrition to the model as a time-dependent variable. Conclusions: PICC should be an alternative to CVC in the paediatric intensive care setting for CLABSI prevention.
Palavras-chave
Peripherally inserted central catheter, Central venous line, Infection, Paediatric intensive care unit
Referências
  1. Advani S, 2011, CLIN INFECT DIS, V52, P1108, DOI 10.1093/cid/cir145
  2. Al Raiy B, 2010, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V38, P149, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.06.008
  3. Arpino B, 2016, STAT MED, V35, P2074, DOI 10.1002/sim.6880
  4. Austin PC, 2014, STAT MED, V33, P1242, DOI 10.1002/sim.5984
  5. Blot SI, 2005, CLIN INFECT DIS, V41, P1591, DOI 10.1086/497833
  6. Brookhart MA, 2006, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V163, P1149, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwj149
  7. Carter JH, 2016, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V37, P939, DOI 10.1017/ice.2016.83
  8. Chopra V, 2014, AM J MED, V127, P319, DOI 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.01.001
  9. Chopra V, 2013, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V34, P908, DOI 10.1086/671737
  10. Cole SR, 2004, COMPUT METH PROG BIO, V75, P45, DOI 10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.10.004
  11. Rosenthal VD, 2016, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V44, P1495, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.007
  12. Dudeck MA, 2015, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V43, P206, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.11.014
  13. Edwards JD, 2015, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V43, P489, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.01.006
  14. Fontela PS, 2012, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V40, P221, DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.04.008
  15. Gibson C, 2013, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V24, P1323, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.04.010
  16. Gilbert RE, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1732, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00340-8
  17. Goes-Silva E, 2009, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V30, P1024, DOI 10.1086/606040
  18. Hord JD, 2016, PEDIATR BLOOD CANCER, V63, P1603, DOI 10.1002/pbc.26053
  19. [Anonymous], 2012, HOW TO GUID PREV CEN
  20. Imai K, 2014, J R STAT SOC B, V76, P243, DOI 10.1111/rssb.12027
  21. Jumani K, 2013, JAMA PEDIATR, V167, P429, DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.775
  22. Leblebicioglu H, 2014, ANN CLIN MICROB ANTI, V13, DOI 10.1186/s12941-014-0051-3
  23. Maki DG, 2006, MAYO CLIN PROC, V81, P1159
  24. Marschall J, 2014, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V35, P753, DOI 10.1086/676533
  25. Miller MR, 2011, PEDIATRICS, V128, pE1077, DOI 10.1542/peds.2010-3675
  26. Nowak JE, 2010, PEDIATR CRIT CARE ME, V11, P579, DOI 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181d90569
  27. O'Grady NP, 2002, PEDIATRICS, V110, DOI 10.1542/peds.110.5.e51
  28. Pages J, 2016, INTENS CARE MED, V42, P1418, DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4406-4
  29. Parienti JJ, 2015, NEW ENGL J MED, V373, P1220, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1500964
  30. Patrick SW, 2014, PEDIATRICS, V134, P705, DOI 10.1542/peds.2014-0613
  31. Randolph AG, 2016, LANCET, V387, P1697, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00566-3
  32. Ranzani OT, 2014, CRIT CARE, V18, DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0580-3
  33. Rosenthal VD, 2009, CLIN INFECT DIS, V49, P1899, DOI 10.1086/648439
  34. Safdar N, 2005, CHEST, V128, P489, DOI 10.1378/chest.128.2.489
  35. Safdar N, 2004, INTENS CARE MED, V30, P62, DOI 10.1007/s00134-003-2045-z
  36. Soares M, 2015, INTENS CARE MED, V41, P2149, DOI 10.1007/s00134-015-4076-7
  37. Toure A, 2013, CLIN NUTR, V32, P1050, DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.12.006
  38. Truche AS, 2016, INTENS CARE MED, V42, P1408, DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4404-6
  39. Wyss R, 2014, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V180, P645, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwu181