Association between ventilatory settings and pneumothorax in extremely preterm neonates

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.76, article ID e2242, 4p, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: Pneumothorax is a catastrophic event associated with high morbidity and mortality, and it is relatively common in neonates. This study aimed to investigate the association between ventilatory parameters and the risk of developing pneumothorax in extremely low birth weight neonates. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 257 extremely low birth weight neonates admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit between January 2012 and December 2017. A comparison was carried out to evaluate the highest value of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), and driving pressure (DP) in the first 7 days of life between neonates who developed pneumothorax and those who did not. The primary outcome was pneumothorax with chest drainage necessity in the first 7 days of life. A matched control group was created in order to adjust for cofounders associated with pneumothorax (CRIB II score, birth weight, and gestational age). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in PEEP, PIP, and DP values in the first 7 days of life between extremely low birth weight neonates who had pneumothorax with chest drainage necessity and those who did not have pneumothorax, even after adjusting for potential cofounders. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-related ventilatory settings in mechanically ventilated extremely low birth weight neonates are not associated with a higher risk of pneumothorax in the first 7 days of life.
Palavras-chave
Air Leak Syndrome, Critical Care, Extremely Low Birth Weight Neonates, Mechanical Ventilation, Pneumothorax, Preterm
Referências
  1. Aly H, 2014, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V27, P402, DOI 10.3109/14767058.2013.818114
  2. Bhatia R, 2011, J PEDIATR-US, V159, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.12.016
  3. Bruschettini M, 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD011724.pub2
  4. Rodrigo FGM, 2017, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V30, P2679, DOI 10.1080/14767058.2016.1261281
  5. Horbar JD, 2002, PEDIATRICS, V110, P143, DOI 10.1542/peds.110.1.143
  6. Irving IM, 1990, NEONATAL SURG, P265
  7. Jeng MJ, 2012, J CHIN MED ASSOC, V75, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.08.001
  8. Keszler M, 2019, ARCH DIS CHILD-FETAL, V104, pF108, DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314734
  9. Klingenberg C, 2017, SYST REV, V10, DOI [10.1002/14651858, DOI 10.1002/14651858]
  10. Klinger G, 2008, PEDIATR CRIT CARE ME, V9, P398, DOI 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31816c6e55
  11. LIPSCOMB AP, 1981, LANCET, V1, P414
  12. Matsushita FY, 2020, EUR J PEDIATR, V179, P1665, DOI 10.1007/s00431-020-03654-z
  13. Morton SU, 2016, CLIN PERINATOL, V43, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.clp.2016.04.001
  14. Murphy MC, 2018, JAMA PEDIATR, V172, P664, DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0623
  15. Pishva Narjes, 2012, Acta Med Iran, V50, P473
  16. Singh Y, 2020, CRIT CARE, V24, DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2787-9
  17. SLY PD, 1984, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V12, P41, DOI 10.1177/0310057X8401200108