BIOACTIVE GLASS IN CAVITARY BONE DEFECTS: A COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN RABBITS
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
11
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.23, n.4, p.202-207, 2015
Resumo
Objectives: To compare bioactive glass and autograft regarding their histomorphometric characteristics. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective case-control experimental study on animals in order to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of bioactive glass versus autograft. Eight rabbits underwent surgery in which a cavitary defect was created in both proximal femurs. One side was filled with bioactive glass granules and the other, with autograft grafted from the contralateral side. The sides were randomized. Fourteen days after surgery, the animals were euthanized. Results: Histologic analysis revealed that bone neoformation was equivalent among the two groups and the osteoblasts cell-count was higher in the femurs treated with bioactive glass. The osteocytes cell-count, however, was lower. The similarity in bone formation between both groups was consistent to literature findings. Conclusion: Bioactive glass is similar to autograft regarding bone neoformation in this animal model of cavitary bone defects.
Palavras-chave
Bone transplantation, Osteogenesis, Rabbits
Referências
- Ahlmann E, 2002, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V84A, P716
- BANWART JC, 1995, SPINE, V20, P1055, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199505000-00012
- Frantzen J, 2011, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V24, P455, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31822a20c6
- Hamadouche M, 2000, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V82B, P1095, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.82B8.11744
- Heikkila JT, 1995, BIOCERAMICS, V8, P35
- HEIKKILA JT, 1995, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, V66, P463
- JEGC Rosselli, 2012, THESIS U FEDERAL SAO
- Lepparanta O, 2008, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V19, P547, DOI 10.1007/s10856-007-3018-5
- Lindfors NC, 2003, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V14, P365, DOI 10.1023/A:1022988117526
- Lindfors NC, 2010, J BIOMED MATER RES B, V94B, P157, DOI 10.1002/jbm.b.31636
- Loty C, 2001, J BONE MINER RES, V16, P231, DOI 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.231
- Mercadante MT, 2008, REV BRAS ORTOP, V43, P59
- MONTGOMERY DM, 1990, J SPINAL DISORD, V3, P370
- Munukka E, 2008, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V19, P27, DOI 10.1007/s10856-007-3143-1
- Peltola MJ, 2001, J BIOMED MATER RES, V58, P261, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:3<261::AID-JBM1015>3.0.CO;2-7
- Phillips GO, 2005, CLIN APPL BONE ALLOG
- Sterne J, 2006, ESSENTIAL MED STAT
- Valimaki VV, 2006, SCAND J SURG, V95, P95
- Virolainen P, 1997, J BIOMED MATER RES, V35, P9, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199704)35:1<9::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-S