A critical and descriptive approach to interictal behavior with the Neurobehavior Inventory (NBI)

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_MARCHETTI_A_critical_and_descriptive_approach_to_interictal_behavior_2012.PDF (226.77 KB)
Citações na Scopus
11
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Autores
OLIVEIRA, Guilherme Nogueira M. de
KUMMER, Arthur
ARAUJO FILHO, Gerardo Maria de
SALGADO, Joao Vincius
DAVID, Anthony S.
TEIXEIRA, Antonio Lucio
Citação
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, v.25, n.3, p.334-340, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Neurobehavior Inventory (NBI) in a group of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients from a tertiary care center, correlating its scores with the presence of psychiatric symptoms. Methods: Clinical and sociodemographic data from ninety-six TLE outpatients were collected, and a neuropsychiatric evaluation was performed with the following instruments: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), structured psychiatric interview (MINI-PLUS), Neurobehavior Inventory (NBI), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Results: Some traits evaluated by the NBI showed adequate internal consistency (mean inter-item correlation between 0.2 and 0.4) and were frequent, such as religiosity (74%) and repetitiveness (60.4%). Principal component analysis showed three factors, named here as emotions (Factor 1), hyposexuality (Factor 2), and unusual ideas (Factor 3). Depressive symptoms on HAM-D showed a strong association with emotions and hyposexuality factors. When patients with left TLE and right TLE were compared, the former exhibited more sadness (p=0.017), and the latter, a greater tendency toward sense of personal destiny (p=0.028). Conclusion: Depression influences NBI scoring, mainly emotionality and hyposexuality traits. Neurobehavior Inventory subscales can be better interpreted with an appropriate evaluation of comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Compromise in left temporal mesial structures is associated with increased tendency toward sad affect, whereas right temporal pathology is associated with increased beliefs in personal destiny.
Palavras-chave
Interictal behavior, Gastaut-Geschwind syndrome, Neurobehavior Inventory, Psychiatric disorders, Depression
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/1193
Referências
  1. AKISKAL HS, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P801
  2. ALTSHULER LL, 1990, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V47, P284
  3. Amorim Patricia, 2000, Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, V22, P106
  4. Araujo Filho GM A, 2010, J EPILEPSY CLIN NEUR, V16, P155
  5. BEAR D, 1982, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V45, P481, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.45.6.481
  6. BEAR DM, 1977, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V34, P454
  7. BERRIOS GE, 1984, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V41, P978
  8. Blumer D., 1995, NEUROPSYCHIATRY PERS, P230
  9. Blumer D, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V53, pS9
  10. BRIGGS SR, 1986, J PERS, V54, P106, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
  11. Brucki SMD, 2003, ARQ NEURO-PSIQUIAT, V61, P777
  12. Carrazana E, 2011, COGN BEHAV NEUROL, V24, P152, DOI 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318230b1db
  13. Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy, 1989, EPILEPSIA, V30, P389
  14. de Oliveira GNM, 2009, J EPILEPSY CLIN NEUR, V15, P123
  15. de Oliveira GNM, 2010, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V19, P328, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.07.013
  16. Devinsky O, 1999, NEUROLOGY, V53, pS13
  17. FLORHENR.P, 1969, AM J PSYCHIAT, V126, P400
  18. GASTAUT H, 1954, Epilepsia, V3, P84, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1954.tb03155.x
  19. Gilliam FG, 2006, LANCET NEUROL, V5, P399, DOI 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70415-X
  20. HAMILTON M, 1960, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V23, P56, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56
  21. Hansen BA, 2003, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V4, P667, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2003.09.009
  22. Hecht D, 2010, NEUROSCI RES, V68, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.neures.2010.06.013
  23. Jones JE, 2008, PSYCHIAT CONTROVERSI, P89, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374006-9.00007-2
  24. Kluver H, 1939, ARCH NEURO PSYCHIATR, V42, P979
  25. Krishnamoorthy ES, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P3, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00679.x
  26. Lin K, 2009, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V14, P400, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.11.002
  27. Locke DEC, 2010, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V17, P172, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.11.005
  28. Miller L, 2012, AM J PSYCHIAT, V169, P89, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10121823
  29. Moreno RA, 1998, REV PSIQUIATR CLIN, V25, P262
  30. Mula M, 2010, EPILEPSIA, V51, P1139, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02424.x
  31. Mula M, 2008, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V13, P658, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.08.002
  32. Mula M, 2008, EPILEPSIA, V49, P650, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01434.x
  33. MUNGAS D, 1982, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V39, P108
  34. Nishida T, 2006, EPILEPSIA, V47, P2104, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00893.x
  35. Ozkara C, 2004, EPILEPTIC DISORD, V6, P241
  36. Pittau F, 2012, EPILEPSIA, V53, P1013, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03464.x
  37. REYNOLDS EH, 1983, BRIT MED J, V286, P918
  38. Reynolds EH, 2008, EPILEPSIA, V49, P1488, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01614.x
  39. ROBERTS JKA, 1982, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V45, P131, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.45.2.131
  40. Seneviratne U, 2010, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V18, P424, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.05.004
  41. Tremont G, 2012, J NEUROPSYCH CLIN N, V24, P47, DOI 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.11020039
  42. Trimble M, 2006, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V9, P407, DOI 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.05.006
  43. Trimble MR, 2007, SOUL BRAIN CEREBRAL
  44. van Elst LT, 2003, EPILEPSY BEHAV, V4, P291, DOI 10.1016/S1525-5050(03)00084-2
  45. VICTOROFF JI, 1994, ARCH NEUROL-CHICAGO, V51, P155
  46. WAXMAN SG, 1975, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V32, P1580
  47. Wuerfel J, 2004, J NEUROL NEUROSUR PS, V75, P640, DOI 10.1136/jnnp.2003.06973

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros