Baropodometric analyses of patients before and after bariatric surgery
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2015
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.70, n.11, p.743-747, 2015
Resumo
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the vertical component of the ground reaction force, plantar pressure, contact area of the feet and double-support time using static and dynamic (gait) baropodometry before and after bariatric surgery. METHODS: Sixteen individuals with a body mass index of between 35 and 55 were evaluated before and after bariatric surgery. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were female and three (18.8%) male and their average age was 46 +/- 10 (21-60) years. An FSCAN system (version 3848) was used for baropodometric analyses (1 km/h and 3 km/h). The peak plantar pressure and ground reaction force were measured for the rear foot and forefoot. The double-support time and foot contact area were measured during gait. RESULTS: There were reductions in the ground reaction force in the forefoot and rear foot and in the foot contact area in all evaluations and of the double-support time at 3 km/h, as well as a significant reduction in the body mass index at six months post-surgery. The peak pressure did not vary at 1 km/h and at 3 km/h, reductions in peak pressure were observed in the left and right rear feet and left forefoot. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after bariatric surgery resulted in decreases in the ground reaction force and contact area of the foot. Plantar pressure was decreased at 3 km/h, especially in the forefoot. There was an increase in rhythm because of a reduction in the double-support time at 3 km/h.
Palavras-chave
Obesity, Morbid, Biomechanics, Foot, Body weight, Bariatric Surgery, Gait
Referências
- Vartiainen P, 2012, J BIOMECH, V45, P1769, DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.05.002
- Gurney JK, 2008, GAIT POSTURE, V27, P706, DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.002
- Dowling AM, 2001, INT J OBESITY, V25, P845, DOI 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801598
- de Souza SAF, 2005, OBES SURG, V15, P1238, DOI 10.1381/096089205774512627
- Frey C, 2007, FOOT ANKLE INT, V28, P996, DOI 10.3113/FAI.2007.0996
- HOCHBERG MC, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P488
- Lai PPK, 2008, CLIN BIOMECH, V23, pS2, DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.02.004
- Butterworth PA, 2012, OBES REV, V13, P630, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.00996.x
- RieggerKrugh C, 1996, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V23, P164
- Harrison AL, 1996, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V23, P353
- Hortobagyi T, 2011, J APPL PHYSIOL, V111, P1391, DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00291.2011
- FELSON DT, 1988, ANN INTERN MED, V109, P18
- Cantalino J. L. R., 2008, CONSCIENTIAE SAUDE, V7, P367
- Coutinho WF, 2006, TRANSTORNOS ALIMENTA, P197
- Freres M, 1997, MAITRES CLES POSTURE
- Giacomozzi C, 2012, J FOOT ANKLE RES S1, V5, pO29
- Kral JG, 1998, HDB OBESITY, P977
- Lafayette KCS, 2007, 9 ENC LAT AM IN CIEN
- Messier SP, 1996, J APPL BIOMECH, V12, P161
- Pi-Sunyer X., 1995, EATING DISORDERS OBE, P401
- Vela S A, 1998, J Foot Ankle Surg, V37, P416
- Vianna DL, 2006, REV BRAS FISIOTER, V10, P339, DOI 10.1590/S1413-35552006000300014