Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.71, n.3, p.152-155, 2016
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.
Palavras-chave
Speech, Stuttering, Models, Neurological, Feedback, Sensory
Referências
- Lincoln M, 2006, J FLUENCY DISORD, V31, P71, DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.04.001
- GOLDBERG G, 1985, BEHAV BRAIN SCI, V8, P567
- Howell P, 2010, EXP NEUROL, V225, P55, DOI 10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.06.012
- Kalinowski J, 2000, NEUROSCI LETT, V281, P198, DOI 10.1016/S0304-3940(00)00850-8
- Ingham RJ, 2012, BRAIN LANG, V122, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.002
- Rami MK, 2005, PERCEPT MOTOR SKILL, V100, P387, DOI 10.2466/pms.100.2.387-393
- Alm PA, 2007, J COMMUN DISORD, V40, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.001
- Nachev P, 2008, NAT REV NEUROSCI, V9, P856, DOI 10.1038/nrn2478
- Cunnington R, 1996, HUM MOVEMENT SCI, V15, P627, DOI 10.1016/0167-9457(96)00018-8
- Antipova EA, 2008, J FLUENCY DISORD, V33, P274, DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2008.09.002
- Cohen MX, 2009, BEHAV BRAIN RES, V199, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.029
- Park J, 2015, J FLUENCY DISORD, V46, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.07.001
- Toyomura A, 2011, NEUROIMAGE, V57, P1507, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.039
- Kiefte M, 2008, J COMMUN DISORD, V41, P33, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.03.002
- Stuart A, 2008, J SPEECH LANG HEAR R, V51, P889, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/065)
- Hudock D, 2011, INT J LANG COMM DIS, V46, P169, DOI 10.3109/13682822.2010.490574
- Alm PA, 2004, J COMMUN DISORD, V37, P325, DOI 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.001
- Bloodstein O., 2008, HDB STUTTERING
- Civier O, 2010, J FLUENCY DISORD, V35, P246, DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2010.05.002
- Conture EG, 2001, STUTTERING ITS NATUR
- Gregory H, 1996, STUTTT THER MAN WORK
- GUENTHER FH, 1994, BIOL CYBERN, V72, P43, DOI 10.1007/BF00206237
- Hanlon RE, 1991, COGNITIVE MICROGENES, P32
- Max L., 2004, CONT ISSUES COMMUNIC, V31, P105
- Packman A, 1996, CLIN LINGUIST PHONET, V10, P235, DOI 10.3109/02699209608985174
- Perkins William H., 1991, IBID 0109, V34, P734, DOI 10.1044/JSHR.3404.734
- Riley GD, 1994, STUTTERING SEVERITY, DOI 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/095)
- Unger JP, 2012, J FLUENCY DISORD, V37, P122, DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.02.001
- Van Riper C., 1982, NATURE STUTTERING