Percutaneous endoscopic versus surgical gastrostomy in patients with benign and malignant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
26
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.71, n.3, p.169-178, 2016
Resumo
To compare the complications and mortality related to gastrostomy procedures performed using surgical and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy techniques, this review covered seven studies. Five of these were retrospective and two were randomized prospective studies. In total, 406 patients were involved, 232 of whom had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and 174 of whom had undergone surgical gastrostomy. The analysis was performed using Review Manager. Risk differences were computed using a fixed-effects model and forest and funnel plots. Data on risk differences and 95% confidence intervals were obtained using the Mantel-Haenszel test. There was no difference in major complications in retrospective (95% CI (-0.11 to 0.10)) or randomized (95% CI (-0.07 to 0.05)) studies. Regarding minor complications, no difference was found in retrospective studies (95% CI (-00.17 to 0.09)), whereas a difference was observed in randomized studies (95% CI (-0.25 to -0.02)). Separate analyses of retrospective and randomized studies revealed no differences between the methods in relation to mortality and major complications. Moreover, low levels of minor complications were observed among endoscopic procedures in randomized studies, with no difference observed compared with retrospective studies.
Palavras-chave
Gastrostomy, Mortality, Complication, Surgical Gastrostomy, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy
Referências
- Zopf Y, 2011, JPEN-PARENTER ENTER, V35, P50, DOI 10.1177/0148607110376197
- [Anonymous], 2014, REV MAN REVMAN COMP
- Rustom IK, 2006, J LARYNGOL OTOL, V120, P463, DOI 10.1017/S0022215106000661
- Leeds JS, 2010, EUR J GASTROEN HEPAT, V22, P591, DOI 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328332d2dd
- Ljungdahl M, 2006, SURG ENDOSC, V20, P1248, DOI 10.1007/s00464-005-0757-6
- EDELMAN DS, 1994, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V8, P47, DOI 10.1007/BF02909493
- Neeff M, 2003, ANZ J SURG, V73, P590, DOI 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02695.x
- Jadad AR, 1996, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V17, P1, DOI 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
- Cosentini EP, 1998, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V133, P1076, DOI 10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1076
- SCOTT JS, 1991, AM SURGEON, V57, P338
- Grant DG, 2009, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V34, P103, DOI 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01889.x
- Hoffer EK, 1999, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V10, P413, DOI 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70058-8
- STIEGMANN GV, 1990, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V36, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(90)70911-X
- Burkitt P, 2011, BRIT J ORAL MAX SURG, V49, P516, DOI 10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.09.005
- Moller P, 1999, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V34, P1050
- JONES M, 1990, JPEN-PARENTER ENTER, V14, P533, DOI 10.1177/0148607190014005533
- Rahnemai-Azar AA, 2014, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V20, P7739, DOI 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7739
- Lipp A, 2009, J CLIN NURS, V18, P938, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02585.x
- Eisen GM, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V55, P784, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70404-5
- Bankhead Robin Rago, 2005, Nutr Clin Pract, V20, P607, DOI 10.1177/0115426505020006607
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Headington Oxford, CRIT APPR TOP CAT
- Finocchiaro Concetta, NUTRITION, V13, P520
- Liberati A, PRISMA STATEMENT REP
- OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group, OXF LEV EV 2
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, NEWC OTT SCAL NOS AS
- Sacks D, 2003, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V14, P199
- Schapiro G D, 1996, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V6, P409
- SIGN Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, SIGN SCOTT INT GUID
- [University of York Prospero Centre for Reviews and Dissemination], GUID NOT REG SYST RE
- Wolman B, 1995, RADIOLOGY, V197, P699