KNEE ARTHROPLASTY REVISION WITH A CONSTRAINED IMPLANT USING HINGE AND ROTATING TIBIAL BASIS

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_ANGELINI_KNEE_ARTHROPLASTY_REVISION_WITH_A_CONSTRAINED_IMPLANT_USING_2016.PDF (414.14 KB)
Citações na Scopus
4
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Autores
ANGELINI, Fabio Jansen
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.24, n.1, p.22-26, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To evaluate the results of total knee arthoplasty revisions performed in high complexity cases, with large bone defects or serious ligament deficiencies using a constrained implant hinge associated to a rotating tibial basis. Methods: We evaluated 11 patients in which we used the constrained implant hinge associated to rotating tibial basis, with minimum follow-up of two years. The indications for the procedure included instability, septic loosening, late postoperative infection without loosening and periprosthetic fracture. We evaluated the knee range of movement and functional outcomes by the Knee Society Score (KSS) e Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), besides the presence of complications. Results: All patients achieved 5(o) to 85(o) minimum range of motion at 1 year postoperatively and, in the present evaluation, KSS ranged from 67 to 95. Three patients had no complications until the last evaluation and two patients required implant revision. Conclusion: Despite the complications rate observed, the functional result were acceptable for most patients, and it proved being a viable alternative, especially for patients with low functional demand.
Palavras-chave
Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Prostheses and Implants
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/14322
Referências
  1. amaguchi MM, 2012, REV BRAS ORTOP, V47, P714
  2. Goncalves RS, 2009, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V17, P1156, DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2009.01.009
  3. Healy WL, 2013, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V471, P215, DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2489-y
  4. Nelson CL, 2003, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V85A, P43
  5. Beckmann NA, 2015, J ARTHROPLASTY, V30, P249, DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.016
  6. Jamsen E, 2012, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V24, P691, DOI 10.3275/8592
  7. Pradhan NR, 2004, KNEE, V11, P469, DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.001
  8. Kurtz S, 2007, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V89A, P780, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222
  9. Bistolfi A, 2013, ORTHOPEDICS, V36, pE1299, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20130920-24
  10. Bistolfi A, 2012, ORTHOPEDICS, V35, pE325, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20120222-34
  11. Biau D, 2006, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V88A, P1285, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.E.00553
  12. Burns AWR, 2006, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P29, DOI 10.1097/01.blo.0000214420.14088.76
  13. Jacofsky DJ, 2010, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V92A, P1282
  14. Neumann DRP, 2012, J ARTHROPLASTY, V27, P814, DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.015
  15. Ritter MA, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P51
  16. Silva ALPE, 2012, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V20, P25, DOI 10.1590/S1413-78522012000100005
  17. Gehrke T, 2014, BONE JOINT J, V96B, P93, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34143
  18. Kim YH, 2014, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V96A, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.M.01130
  19. McLaughlin JR, 2014, ORTHOPEDICS, V37, pE975, DOI 10.3928/01477447-20141023-53
  20. McNabb DC, 2015, J KNEE SURG, V28, P97, DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1396080
  21. RANAWAT CS, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P94
  22. Sanguineti F, 2014, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V134, P1601, DOI 10.1007/s00402-014-2061-1

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41