THE EFFECT OF MONOSIALOGANGLYOSIDE (GM-1) ADMINISTRATION IN SPINAL CORD INJURY

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
13
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ATHA COMUNICACAO & EDITORA
Citação
ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, v.24, n.3, p.123-126, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objective: To evaluate the effect of monosialoganglioside (GM-1) in spinal cord trauma patients seen in our service who have not been treated with methylprednisolone. Methods: Thirty patients with acute spinal cord trauma were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, patients received 200 mg GM-1 in the initial assessment and thereafter received 100 mg intravenous per day for 30 days and Group 2 (control) received saline. Patients were evaluated periodically (at 6 weeks, 6 months, one year and two years), using a standardized neurological assessment of the American Spinal Injury Association / International Spinal Cord Society. Results: The comparative statistical analysis of motor indices, sensitive indices for pain and touch according to the standardization of ASIA / ISCOS showed that the assessments at 6 weeks, 6 months and 2 years, GM-Group 1 patients had higher rates than the control group regarding sensitivity to pain and touch, with no statistically significant difference from the motor index. Conclusion: The functional assessment showed improvement in the sensitive indices of patients treated with GM1 after post-traumatic spinal cord injury compared to patients who received placebo.
Palavras-chave
Spinal cord injuries, G(M1) Ganglioside, Outcome assessment (Health care)
Referências
  1. Bracken MB, 1998, J NEUROSURG, V89, P699, DOI 10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0699
  2. Hurlbert RJ, 2000, J NEUROSURG, V93, P1, DOI 10.3171/spi.2000.93.1.0001
  3. Sekhon LHS, 2001, SPINE, V26, pS2, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002
  4. Banerjea R, 2008, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V89, P1448, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.047
  5. Ray SK, 2001, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V939, P436
  6. Short D, 2001, CURR OPIN NEUROL, V14, P759, DOI 10.1097/00019052-200112000-00013
  7. Fouad K, 2011, BRAIN RES BULL, V84, P337, DOI 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.04.017
  8. Bracken MB, 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P1597, DOI 10.1001/jama.277.20.1597
  9. Noonan VK, 2008, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V89, P1074, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.041
  10. Marcon RM, 2010, SPINAL CORD, V48, P808, DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.37
  11. BRACKEN MB, 1992, J NEUROSURG, V76, P23, DOI 10.3171/jns.1992.76.1.0023
  12. Cristante AF, 2012, CLINICS, V67, P1219, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(10)16
  13. Beattie MS, 2000, J NEUROTRAUM, V17, P915, DOI 10.1089/neu.2000.17.915
  14. Krause JS, 2008, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V89, P1482, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.062
  15. Blight A R, 2001, Curr Opin Investig Drugs, V2, P801
  16. Gebrin AS, 1997, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V5, P123
  17. Gebrin AS, 1997, REV BRAS ORTOP, V32, P103
  18. Geisler FH, 2001, SPINE, V26, pS87, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00015
  19. Haan N., 2014, ADV WOUND CARE, V3, P156
  20. Marcon RM, 2014, EXPT STUDY FUNCTIONA
  21. Masini M., 2001, J BRAS NEUROCIRURG, V12, P97
  22. Ralchle KA, 2007, J PAIN, V8, P718, DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.006
  23. Santos GB, 2010, FENS ANN, V5
  24. Souza FI, 2011, COLUNA COLUMNA, V10, P305
  25. Souza FI, 2013, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V21, P87