Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/16249
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorMARCON, Raphael Martus-
dc.contributor.authorCRISTANTE, Alexandre Fogaca-
dc.contributor.authorBARROS FILHO, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de-
dc.contributor.authorFERREIRA, Ricardo-
dc.contributor.authorSANTOS, Gustavo Bispo dos-
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T16:40:02Z-
dc.date.available2016-10-17T16:40:02Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationClinics, v.71, n.6, p.351-360, 2016-
dc.identifier.issn1807-5932-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/16249-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional and histological effects of ganglioside G(M1) and erythropoietin after experimental spinal cord contusion injury. METHODS: Fifty male Wistar rats underwent experimental spinal cord lesioning using an NYU-Impactor device and were randomly divided into the following groups, which received treatment intraperitoneally. The G(M1) group received ganglioside G(M1) (30 mg/kg); the erythropoietin group received erythropoietin (1000 IU/kg); the combined group received both drugs; and the saline group received saline (0.9%) as a control. A fifth group was the laminectomy group, in which the animals were subjected to laminectomy alone, without spinal lesioning or treatment. The animals were evaluated according to the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) scale, motor evoked potential recordings and, after euthanasia, histological analysis of spinal cord tissue. RESULTS: The erythropoietin group had higher BBB scores than the G(M1) group. The combined group had the highest BBB scores, and the saline group had the lowest BBB scores. No significant difference in latency was observed between the three groups that underwent spinal cord lesioning and intervention. However, the combined group showed a significantly higher signal amplitude than the other treatment groups or the saline group (p<0.01). Histological tissue analysis showed no significant difference between the groups. Axonal index was significantly enhanced in the combined group than any other intervention (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: G(M1) and erythropoietin exert therapeutic effects on axonal regeneration and electrophysiological and motor functions in rats subjected to experimental spinal cord lesioning and administering these two substances in combination potentiates their effects.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherHOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO-
dc.relation.ispartofClinics-
dc.rightsopenAccess-
dc.subjectErythropoietin-
dc.subjectGangliosides-
dc.subjectGanglioside G(M1)-
dc.subjectSpinal cord compression-
dc.subjectSpinal cord-
dc.subjectRats-
dc.subjectWistar-
dc.subject.othermotor evoked-potentials-
dc.subject.otherhyperbaric-oxygen therapy-
dc.subject.otherneurological recovery-
dc.subject.otherporcine model-
dc.subject.othergrowth-factor-
dc.subject.otherinjury-
dc.subject.othernerve-
dc.subject.othermarkers-
dc.subject.otherrepair-
dc.titleEffects of ganglioside G(M1) and erythropoietin on spinal cord lesions in rats: functional and histological evaluations-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO-
dc.identifier.doi10.6061/clinics/2016(06)11-
dc.identifier.pmid27438570-
dc.subject.wosMedicine, General & Internal-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage351-
hcfmusp.description.endpage360-
hcfmusp.description.issue6-
hcfmusp.description.volume71-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000380822700011-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84978758951-
hcfmusp.origem.idSCIELO:S1807-59322016000600351-
hcfmusp.publisher.citySAO PAULO-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryBRAZIL-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAgrawal G, 2009, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P2086, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333953-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBaptiste DC, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P318, DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.23.318-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBertelli JA, 2004, J NEUROSCI METH, V134, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.11.002-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBlight A R, 2001, Curr Opin Investig Drugs, V2, P801-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMiranda TAB, 2012, CLINICS, V67, P799, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)16-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceButovsky O, 2007, MOL CELL NEUROSCI, V35, P490, DOI 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceChopek JW, 2010, MECH AGEING DEV, V131, P650, DOI [10.1016/j.mad.2010.09.001, 10.1016/j.mad.2010.08.001]-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCristante AF, 2013, SPINAL CORD, V51, P501, DOI 10.1038/sc.2013.18-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCristante AF, 2009, SPINAL CORD, V47, P458, DOI 10.1038/sc.2008.155-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCristante AF, 2009, SPINAL CORD, V47, P733, DOI 10.1038/sc.2009.24-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCristante AF, 2012, SPINAL CORD, V50, P502, DOI 10.1038/sc.2012.16-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCUELLO AC, 1989, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V86, P2056, DOI 10.1073/pnas.86.6.2056-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFang XQ, 2009, CHINESE MED J-PEKING, V122, P1631, DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.14.006-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFestoff BW, 2014, EXPERT OPIN DRUG DIS, V9, P1151, DOI 10.1517/17460441.2014.941350-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGebrin AS, 1997, REV BRAS ORTOP, V32, P103-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGeisler FH, 2001, SPINE, V26, pS87, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00015-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceGuimaraes PEM, 2009, SPINAL CORD, V47, P171, DOI 10.1038/sc.2008.67-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHaan N., 2014, ADV WOUND CARE, V3, P156-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIyer S, 2010, J NEUROSCI METH, V193, P210, DOI 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.08.017-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLetaif OB, 2015, CLINICS, V70, P700, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2015(10)08-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarcon RM, 2010, SPINAL CORD, V48, P808, DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.37-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceModi HN, 2011, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V93A, P1781, DOI [10.2106/JBJS.I.01794, 10.2106/JBJS.J.01794]-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNarazaki Douglas Kenji, 2006, Clinics, V61, P453, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322006000500013-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNessler JA, 2006, J NEUROTRAUM, V23, P882, DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.23.882-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSekiguchi Y, 2003, SPINE, V28, P2577, DOI 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096674.12519.12-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSkinner SA, 2013, J CLIN MONIT COMPUT, V27, P195, DOI 10.1007/s10877-012-9417-2-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSosa I, 2005, EXP NEUROL, V195, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.04.016-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSurey S, 2014, NEUROSCIENCE, V275, P62, DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.003-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceWAGNER FC, 1971, J NEUROSURG, V35, P272, DOI 10.3171/jns.1971.35.3.0272-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceYang JH, 2013, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V95A, P835, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.K.00575-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
dc.identifier.eissn1980-5322-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus8-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-04-12-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - FM/MOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - HC/IOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_MARCON_Effects_of_ganglioside_GM1_and_erythropoietin_on_spinal_2016.PDFpublishedVersion (English)875.69 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.