Randomized clinical trial comparing lumbar percutaneous hydrodiscectomy with lumbar open microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc protrusions and herniations

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_CRISTANTE_Randomized_clinical_trial_comparing_lumbar_percutaneous_hydrodiscectomy_with_2016.PDF (357.07 KB)
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2016
DOI
SciELO
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Autores
Citação
CLINICS, v.71, n.5, p.276-280, 2016
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: Hydrodiscectomy is a new technique used for percutaneous spinal discectomy that employs a high-intensity stream of water for herniated disc ablation and tissue aspiration. No previous clinical study has examined the effects of percutaneous hydrodiscectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of hydrodiscectomy compared to open microdiscectomy regarding pain, function, satisfaction, complications and recurrence rates. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, patients referred to our tertiary hospital for lumbar back pain were recruited and included in the study if they had disc protrusion or small herniation in only one level, without neurological deficits and with no resolution after six weeks of conservative treatment. One group underwent open microdiscectomy, and the other group underwent percutaneous microdiscectomy via hydrosurgery. Function was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and pain was assessed using a visual analog scale. Evaluations were performed preoperatively, and then during the first week and at one, three, six and twelve months postoperatively. Personal satisfaction was verified. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01367860. RESULTS: During the study period, 20 patients were included in each arm and 39 completed one-year of follow-up (one patient died of unrelated causes). Both groups exhibited equal improvement on the visual analog scale and Oswestry evaluations after treatment, without any significant differences. The improvement in the lumbar visual analog scale score was not significant in the hydrodiscectomy group (p=0.138). The rates of infection, pain, recurrence and satisfaction were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous hydrodiscectomy was demonstrated to be as effective as open microdiscectomy for reducing pain. The rates of complications and recurrence of herniation were similar between groups. Patient satisfaction with the treatment was also similar between groups.
Palavras-chave
Discectomy, Percutaneous Discectomy, Low Back Pain, Spine
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/16253
Referências
  1. Amoretti N, 2005, CLIN IMAG, V29, P98, DOI 10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.10.024
  2. Barendse GAM, 2001, SPINE, V26, P287, DOI 10.1097/00007632-200102010-00014
  3. Casper G D, 1995, J Clin Laser Med Surg, V13, P27
  4. CHATTERJEE S, 1995, SPINE, V20, P734, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199503150-00016
  5. Choy DS, 2007, PHOTOMED LASER SURG, V25, P60
  6. CHOY DSJ, 1992, SPINE, V17, P949, DOI 10.1097/00007632-199208000-00014
  7. Choy DSJ, 2004, PHOTOMED LASER SURG, V22, P407, DOI 10.1089/1549541042555622
  8. DABEZIES EJ, 1988, SPINE, V13, P561, DOI 10.1097/00007632-198805000-00022
  9. DAVIS GW, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P98
  10. Freedman BA, 2012, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V25, pE1, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318227ecfb
  11. Freeman BJC, 2005, SPINE, V30, P2369, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000186587.43373.f2
  12. Gibson JNA, 2007, SPINE, V32, P1735, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180bc2431
  13. HIJIKATA S, 1989, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P9
  14. Huh HY, 2010, J KOREAN NEUROSURG S, V47, P370, DOI 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.370
  15. Le Huec JC, 2012, J SPINAL DISORD TECH, V25, P249, DOI 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182166860
  16. Lee SH, 2006, MT SINAI J MED, V73, P795
  17. Maida G, 2014, J NEUROSURG SCI, V58, P95
  18. Matsui H, 1997, INT ORTHOP, V21, P169, DOI 10.1007/s002640050143
  19. MAYER HM, 1993, J NEUROSURG, V78, P216, DOI 10.3171/jns.1993.78.2.0216
  20. Mochida J, 2001, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V83B, P501, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.83B4.11508
  21. ONIK G, 1990, NEUROSURGERY, V26, P228
  22. Onik G, 1990, NEUROSURGERY, V26, P232
  23. Pan L, 2014, INT J SURG, V12, P534, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.015
  24. Pauza Kevin J, 2004, Spine J, V4, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.001
  25. Righesso O, 2007, NEUROSURGERY, V61, P545, DOI 10.1227/01.NEU0000280008.72190.15
  26. Ruetten S, 2008, SPINE, V33, P931, DOI 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7
  27. SCHWETSCHENAU PR, 1976, J NEUROSURG, V45, P622, DOI 10.3171/jns.1976.45.6.0622
  28. SCOTT J, 1979, ANN RHEUM DIS, V38, P560, DOI 10.1136/ard.38.6.560
  29. Singh K, 2005, SPINE, V30, pS20, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000175181.28730.ab
  30. Slotman GJ, 1998, J LAPAROENDOSC ADV A, V8, P261, DOI 10.1089/lap.1998.8.261
  31. SMITH L, 1964, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V187, P137
  32. Teng GJ, 1997, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V8, P457, DOI 10.1016/S1051-0443(97)70589-X
  33. Vigatto R, 2007, SPINE, V32, P481, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000255075.11496.47
  34. Wu XT, 2006, SPINE, V31, P2689, DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000244615.43199.07

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41