Clinical, Laboratorial, and Urodynamic Findings of Prostatic Artery Embolization for the Treatment of Urinary Retention Related to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. A Prospective Single-Center Pilot Study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
79
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2013
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Citação
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, v.36, n.4, p.978-986, 2013
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
This study was designed to describe the clinical, laboratorial, and urodynamic findings of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with urinary retention due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A prospective study of 11 patients with urinary retention due to BPH was conducted. Patients underwent physical examination, prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement, transrectal ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. International prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), and urodynamic testing were used to assess the outcome before and after 1 year. Clinical success was 91 % (10/11 patients) with a mean follow-up of 22.3 months (range, 12-41 months). At the first year follow-up, the mean IPSS score was 2.8 points (p = 0.04), mean QoL was 0.4 points (p = 0.001), mean PSA decreased from 10.1 to 4.3 ng/mL (p = 0.003), maximum urinary flow (Qmax) improved from 4.2 to 10.8 mL/sec (p = 0.009), and detrusor pressure (Pdet) decreased from 85.7 to 51.5 cm H2O (p = 0.007). Before PAE, Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index (BOOI) showed values > 40 in 100 % of patients. After PAE, 30 % of patients were > 40 (obstructed), 40 % were between 20 and 40 (undetermined), and 30 % were < 20 (unobstructed). Patients with a BOOI < 20 had higher PSA values at 1-day after PAE. Clinical and urodynamic parameters improved significantly after PAE in patients with acute urinary retention due to BPH. Total PSA at day 1 after PAE was higher in patients with unobstructed values in pressure flow studies.
Palavras-chave
Clinical practice, Imaging, Arterial intervention, Embolization/embolisation/embolotherapy, Endovascular treatment, Transcatheter therapy, MRI/MRA, Prostate, Urinary tract
Referências
  1. Abrams P, 1999, BJU INT, V84, P14
  2. Antunes Alberto Azoubel, 2006, Clinics (Sao Paulo), V61, P545, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322006000600010
  3. APPLETON DS, 1988, BRIT J UROL, V61, P45, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1988.tb09160.x
  4. Barbieri A, 2002, UROL INT, V69, P318, DOI 10.1159/000066115
  5. BISCHOFF W, 1977, UROLOGE A, V16, P99
  6. Carnevale FC, 2011, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V34, P1330, DOI 10.1007/s00270-011-0136-8
  7. Carnevale FC, 2010, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V33, P355, DOI 10.1007/s00270-009-9727-z
  8. Carnevale FC, 2013, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V24, P535, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.019
  9. Cross MJ, 2001, TRENDS PHARMACOL SCI, V22, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01676-X
  10. DeMeritt JS, 2000, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V11, P767, DOI 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61638-8
  11. Jeon GS, 2009, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V20, P384, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.11.014
  12. Madersbacher S, 2004, EUR UROL, V46, P547, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.016
  13. McVary KT, 2011, J UROLOGY, V185, P1793, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.074
  14. McVary KT, 2006, AM J MANAG CARE, V12, P122
  15. Michel F, 2002, J UROLOGY, V168, P2550, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000036371.49460.7d
  16. Milord RA, 2000, AM J SURG PATHOL, V24, P1378, DOI 10.1097/00000478-200010000-00007
  17. MITCHELL ME, 1976, J UROLOGY, V115, P692
  18. Muzzonigro G, 2004, J UROLOGY, V172, P611, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000131258.36966.dI
  19. Nadalini V F, 1981, Radiol Med, V67, P61
  20. Pisco JM, 2011, J VASC INTERV RADIOL, V22, P11, DOI 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.09.030
  21. Rassweiler J, 2006, EUR UROL, V50, P969, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.042
  22. Rastinehad AR, 2008, UROLOGY, V71, P181, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.012
  23. Schafer W, 2002, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V21, P261, DOI 10.1002/nau.10066
  24. Sun F, 2008, RADIOLOGY, V246, P783, DOI 10.1148/radiol.2463070647
  25. Tan L, 2009, NAT REV UROL, V6, P680, DOI 10.1038/nrurol.2009.215