Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/20120
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSistema FMUSP-HC: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) e Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP-
dc.contributor.authorCHO, Alvaro Baik-
dc.contributor.authorPAULOS, Renata Gregorio-
dc.contributor.authorBERSANI, Gustavo-
dc.contributor.authorIAMAGUCHI, Raquel Bernardelli-
dc.contributor.authorTORRES, Luciano Ruiz-
dc.contributor.authorWEI, Teng Hsiang-
dc.contributor.authorRESENDE, Marcelo Rosa De-
dc.contributor.authorMATTAR JUNIOR, Rames-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T15:36:26Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-09T15:36:26Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationMICROSURGERY, v.37, n.3, p.218-221, 2017-
dc.identifier.issn0738-1085-
dc.identifier.urihttps://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/20120-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Although a reasonable number of studies report satisfactory results with fibrin glue application in microvascular anastomosis since 1977, its utilization in the clinical setting has being scant in the literature. The aim of this study was to report the cumulated experience with the fibrin glue in free flaps over a period of 10 years, comparing the survival rate with the standard sutured anastomosis. Patients and methods: From August 2001 through November 2014, 83 consecutive free flaps were performed by a team of surgeons from two hospitals. About 56 flaps were performed in 56 patients using the fibrin glue augmented microvascular anastomosis and 27 flaps were performed in 27 patients using the conventional anastomosis technique. The decision on whether or not the fibrin glue should be used at the anastomoses was based on its availability and whose surgeon was performing the anastomoses. About approximately 60% of sutures stitches were used that would be used in a conventional anastomosis, when fibrin glue application was anticipated (ranging from 5 to 7 sutures in the arteries and 5 to 8 in the veins). Results: The overall survival rate of the flaps performed with fibrin glue application was 92.85%. In one case, a revision of the venous anastomosis was required due to early flap congestion. Four cases (7.14%) had failure of the first free flap and two of them were submitted to another free flap without fibrin glue application. In the flaps performed with the conventional anastomosis technique the survival rate was 92.59%. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.97). Conclusion: The application of fibrin glue in microvascular anastomoses did not increase the rate of flap loss and had a potential to reduce the number of sutures required to complete an anastomosis by its sealing effect. (C) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.relation.ispartofMicrosurgery-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess-
dc.subject.othermicro-vascular anastomoses-
dc.subject.otherrat model-
dc.subject.othersealant-
dc.subject.otheradhesive-
dc.subject.othersurgery-
dc.subject.othervessels-
dc.subject.otherdevice-
dc.titleA REINFORCEMENT OF THE SUTURED MICROVASCULAR ANASTOMOSIS WITH FIBRIN GLUE APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH THE STANDARD CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE-
dc.typearticle-
dc.rights.holderCopyright WILEY-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/micr.30054-
dc.identifier.pmid27040603-
dc.subject.wosSurgery-
dc.type.categoryoriginal article-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion-
hcfmusp.author.externalRESENDE, Marcelo Rosa De:Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Hand Surg & Reconstruct Microsurg Grp, Inst Orthoped & Traumathol,Hosp Clin, Sao Paulo, Brazil-
hcfmusp.description.beginpage218-
hcfmusp.description.endpage221-
hcfmusp.description.issue3-
hcfmusp.description.volume37-
hcfmusp.origemWOS-
hcfmusp.origem.idWOS:000397333400006-
hcfmusp.origem.id2-s2.0-84963705476-
hcfmusp.publisher.cityHOBOKEN-
hcfmusp.publisher.countryUSA-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceACLAND RD, 1977, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V60, P868, DOI 10.1097/00006534-197712000-00004-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAHN CY, 1994, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V93, P1481, DOI 10.1097/00006534-199406000-00022-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceAKSIK I A, 1986, Microsurgery, V7, P2, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920070103-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceBAXTER TJ, 1972, BRIT J SURG, V59, P617, DOI 10.1002/bjs.1800590809-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCho AB, 2008, MICROSURG, V28, P367, DOI 10.1002/micr.20494-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCho AB, 2007, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V119, P95, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000245007.33054.98-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceCho AB, 2009, MICROSURG, V29, P24, DOI 10.1002/micr.20554-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDANIEL RK, 1984, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V74, P329, DOI 10.1097/00006534-198409000-00001-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceDrake DB, 2000, ANN PLAS SURG, V45, P520, DOI 10.1097/00000637-200045050-00009-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceFLAHIFF C, 1992, J BIOMED MATER RES, V26, P481, DOI 10.1002/jbm.820260406-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceHan SK, 1998, MICROSURG, V18, P306, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1998)18:5<306::AID-MICR2>3.3.CO;2-#-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceIsogai N, 1996, J HAND SURG-BRIT EUR, V21B, P573, DOI 10.1016/S0266-7681(96)80133-1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceKLETTER G, 1978, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V90, P415-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceLIDMAN D, 1981, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V15, P103-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMarek CA, 1998, ANN PLAS SURG, V41, P415, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00011-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMATRAS H, 1985, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V43, P605, DOI 10.1016/0278-2391(85)90129-6-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceMatras H, 1977, DTSCH Z MUND KIEFER, V1, P19-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceNYLANDER G, 1989, J HAND SURG-AM, V14A, P44, DOI 10.1016/0363-5023(89)90057-9-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePadubidri AN, 1996, ANN PLAS SURG, V37, P41, DOI 10.1097/00000637-199607000-00007-
hcfmusp.relation.referencePEARL RM, 1977, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V144, P227-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceRitschl LM, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V136, P1216, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001808-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSARTORIUS C J, 1986, Microsurgery, V7, P79, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920070206-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSpotnitz WD, 2001, AM J SURG, V182, p8S, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00771-1-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceSUGIURA K, 1985, Microsurgery, V6, P125, DOI 10.1002/micr.1920060214-
hcfmusp.relation.referenceZeebregts CJ, 2000, MICROSURG, V20, P131, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(2000)20:3<131::AID-MICR7>3.0.CO;2-K-
dc.description.indexMEDLINE-
dc.identifier.eissn1098-2752-
hcfmusp.citation.scopus11-
hcfmusp.scopus.lastupdate2024-04-12-
Appears in Collections:

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MOT
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - FM/MOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia - HC/IOT

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético


Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art_CHO_A_REINFORCEMENT_OF_THE_SUTURED_MICROVASCULAR_ANASTOMOSIS_WITH_2017.PDF
  Restricted Access
publishedVersion (English)125.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.