Educational program promoting regular physical exercise improves functional capacity and daily living physical activity in subjects with knee osteoarthritis

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
18
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2017
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
Autores
SILVA, Jose Messias Rodrigues da
FRANCISCO, Lucila da Silva
FARIAS, Fabiane Elize Sabine de
CIOLAC, Emmanuel Gomes
Citação
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, v.18, article ID 546, 8p, 2017
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Physical exercise and educational programs promote several benefits for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, little is known about the effects of educational programs promoting the regular practice of physical exercise. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of an interdisciplinary educational program, emphasizing the recommendation for regular practice of physical exercise, on functional capacity and daily living physical activity in individuals with knee OA. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-nine individuals (50 men) with an established diagnosis of knee OA (degree I to IV in the Kelgreen and Lawrence scale) were randomly allocated into a multidisciplinary educational program (EDU; n = 112) or control group (CON; n = 127). Functional capacity (sit and reach, 6-min walking test (6MWT), timed up and down stairs test, timed up and go test (TUGT), and five times sit-to-stand test (FTSST)) and daily living physical activity (IPAQ, short version) were measured before, during (6 months) and after 12 months of follow-up. Results: Body mass index reduced significantly (P < 0.05) after 6 months, and remained reduced after 12-month of follow-up in EDU, but not in CON. EDU group improved (P < 0.05) timed up and down stairs (19%), TUGT (32.5%) and FTSST (30%) performance after 6 months of follow-up, which remained improved after 12 months of follow-up. Functional capacity did not change in CON, excepted for the timed up and down stairs performance that increased after 6 months (12%, P < 0.05), but returned to levels similar to baseline after 12 months of follow-up. There was also an increase (P < 0.05) in the prevalence of active and very active individuals, as well as a reduction (P < 0.05) in the prevalence of sedentary individuals in EDU group during follow-up. There were no significant changes on sit and reach and 6MWT performance during follow-up in both groups. Conclusions: The results suggest that an educational program emphasizing the recommendation for regular practice of physical exercise may be an effective tool for improving functional capacity and daily physical activity in individuals with knee OA.
Palavras-chave
Daily living physical activity, Educational program, Physical fitness, Functional capacity, Physical exercise, Osteoarthritis
Referências
  1. ALTMAN R, 1986, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V29, P1039, DOI 10.1002/art.1780290816
  2. Altman RD, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V43, P1905
  3. Barlow JH, 2000, HEALTH EDUC RES, V15, P665, DOI 10.1093/her/15.6.665
  4. de Oliveira CMB, 2011, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V61, P255, DOI 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70029-0
  5. Blagojevic M, 2010, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V18, P24, DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2009.08.010
  6. BORG GAV, 1982, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V14, P377, DOI 10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012
  7. Ciolac EG, 2016, SPORTS MED, V46, P1239, DOI 10.1007/s40279-016-0507-z
  8. Ciolac EG, 2015, CLINICS, V70, P7, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2015(01)02
  9. Ciolac EG, 2013, CLINICS, V68, P710, DOI 10.6061/clinics/2013(05)20
  10. Ciolac EG, 2011, CLINICS, V66, P2079, DOI 10.1590/S1807-59322011001200013
  11. de Rezende MU, 2017, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V25, P18, DOI 10.1590/1413-785220172501165604
  12. de Rezende MU, 2016, GERIATR ORTHOP SURG, V7, P86, DOI 10.1177/2151458516645634
  13. den Ouden MEM, 2013, GERIATR GERONTOL INT, V13, P274, DOI 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00890.x
  14. de Rezende MU, 2016, BMJ OPEN SPORT EXERC, V2
  15. Fransen M, 2003, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V3
  16. Lima LCF, 2015, FRONT PHYSIOL, V6, DOI 10.3389/fphys.2015.00304
  17. Hinman MR, 2014, J GERIATR PHYS THER, V37, P1, DOI 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318298969f
  18. HOEGER WWK, 1992, RES Q EXERCISE SPORT, V63, P191, DOI 10.1080/02701367.1992.10607580
  19. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2012, DAD PREL CENS 2012 J
  20. MATHIAS S, 1986, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V67, P387
  21. Montgomery PS, 1998, J AM GERIATR SOC, V46, P706, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03804.x
  22. Ostir GV, 1998, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V53, pM491, DOI 10.1093/gerona/53A.6.M491
  23. Pardini R, 2001, REV BRASILEIRA CIENC, V9, P45
  24. Peat G, 2001, ANN RHEUM DIS, V60, P91, DOI 10.1136/ard.60.2.91
  25. Ravaud P, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P786
  26. Ravaud P, 2004, ANN RHEUM DIS, V63, P703, DOI 10.1136/ard.2003.009803
  27. Ravaud P, 2009, BRIT MED J, V338, DOI 10.1136/bmj.b421
  28. deRezende MU, 2013, J ARTHRITIS, V2, P113
  29. Richardson J, 2014, CLIN REHABIL, V28, P1067, DOI 10.1177/0269215514532478
  30. Rosales AD, 2014, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V22, P136, DOI 10.1590/1413-78522014220300679
  31. Soares MR, 2011, J BRAS PNEUMOL, V37, P576, DOI 10.1590/S1806-37132011000500003
  32. Tilg H, 2006, NAT REV IMMUNOL, V6, P772, DOI 10.1038/nri1937
  33. Vincent KR, 2012, PM&R, V4, pS45, DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.019
  34. Whitney SL, 2005, PHYS THER, V85, P1034
  35. Zhang W, 2008, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE, V16, P137, DOI 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013