Hallmarks of liver lesions in pigs naturally infected by hepatitis E virus genotype 3

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
REVISTA PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA
Autores
SOUZA, Alex J. S. de
MALHEIROS, Andreza P.
SOARES, Manoel do C. P.
PEREIRA, Washington L. A.
SA, Lilian R. M.
Citação
PESQUISA VETERINARIA BRASILEIRA, v.38, n.1, p.65-70, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Histopathological evaluation of liver from 33 pigs slaughtered for human consumption in Amazon region, previously tested by serology and molecular techniques for hepatitis E virus infection (HEV), was analysed in three groups: Group 1, negative for both HEV-RNA and anti-HEV IgG (n=10); Group 2, positive for HEV-RNA (n=13); Group 3, positive for anti-HEV IgG (n=10). Group 2 showed a significant difference among the groups for liver lesions such as lobular activity (P=0.007), periportal interface hepatitis (P=0.004), portal inflammation (P=0.028) hepatitis with lobular, portal and periportal interface activity (P=0.001). HEV detection by immunohistochemistry was performed and 3 of 6 samples of group 2 were positive. Pigs naturally infected by HEV genotype 3 present microscopic necroinflammatory liver lesions similar to HEV in humans. Liver histopathology showed be important in the diagnosis of active asymptomatic HEV infection in pigs slaughtered for human consumption because hepatic liver lesions may present distinct profiles according to molecular and serological diagnosis and in this sense, histopathology and immunohistochemistry may be an important complementary diagnostic tool.
Palavras-chave
Liver, hepatitis E virus, genotype 3, hepatitis, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, swine, zoonosis, pathology
Referências
  1. Cullen J. M., 2015, JUBB KENNEDY PALMERS, V2, P259
  2. Cullen JM, 2009, VET CLIN N AM-SMALL, V39, P395, DOI 10.1016/j.cvsm.2009.02.003
  3. de Deus N, 2008, VET MICROBIOL, V132, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.04.036
  4. de Deus N, 2007, VET MICROBIOL, V119, P105, DOI 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.08.027
  5. Gupta P, 2012, J VIRAL HEPATITIS, V19, pE177, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01498.x
  6. Ha SK, 2004, J VIRAL HEPATITIS, V11, P263, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2004.00498.x
  7. Halbur PG, 2001, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V39, P918, DOI 10.1128/JCM.39.3.918-923.2001
  8. Huang FF, 2002, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V40, P1326, DOI 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1326-1332.2002
  9. Lee SH, 2007, J VET SCI, V8, P51, DOI 10.4142/jvs.2007.8.1.51
  10. Longerich Thomas, 2008, P47, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7643-8558-3_3
  11. Meng XJ, 2010, VET MICROBIOL, V140, P256, DOI 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.03.017
  12. Meng XJ, 1998, ARCH VIROL, V143, P1405, DOI 10.1007/s007050050384
  13. Meng XJ, 1998, J VIROL, V72, P9714
  14. Meng XJ, 1997, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V94, P9860, DOI 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9860
  15. Schlosser J, 2014, VET RES, V45, DOI 10.1186/s13567-014-0121-8
  16. Smith DB, 2014, J GEN VIROL, V95, P2223, DOI 10.1099/vir.0.068429-0
  17. de Souza AJS, 2012, COMP IMMUNOL MICROB, V35, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.04.004
  18. Wang YC, 1999, J GEN VIROL, V80, P169, DOI 10.1099/0022-1317-80-1-169
  19. Yu C, 2010, J VIROL, V84, P11264, DOI 10.1128/JVI.01205-10