Increased DNA Copy Number Variation Mosaicism in Elderly Human Brain
Carregando...
Citações na Scopus
7
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HINDAWI LTD
Autores
VILLELA, Darine
PEARSON, Peter
ROSENBERG, Carla
Citação
NEURAL PLASTICITY, article ID 2406170, 9p, 2018
Resumo
Aging is a complex process strongly determined by genetics. Previous reports have shown that the genome of neuronal cells displays somatic genomic mosaicism including DNA copy number variations (CNVs). CNVs represent a significant source of genetic variation in the human genome and have been implicated in several disorders and complex traits, representing a potential mechanism that contributes to neuronal diversity and the etiology of several neurological diseases and provides new insights into the normal, complex functions of the brain. Nonetheless, the features of somatic CNV mosaicism in nondiseased elderly brains have not been investigated. In the present study, we demonstrate a highly significant increase in the number of CNVs in nondiseased elderly brains compared to the blood. In two neural tissues isolated from paired postmortem samples (same individuals), we found a significant increase in the frequency of deletions in both brain areas, namely, the frontal cortex and cerebellum. Also, deletions were found to be significantly larger when present only in the cerebellum. The sizes of the variants described here were in the 150-760 kb range, and importantly, nearly all of them were present in the Database of Genomic Variants (common variants). Nearly all evidence of genome structural variation in human brains comes from studies detecting changes in single cells which were interpreted as derived from independent, isolated mutational events. The observations based on array-CGH analysis indicate the existence of an extensive clonal mosaicism of CNVs within and between the human brains revealing a different type of variation that had not been previously characterized.
Palavras-chave
Referências
- Baillie JK, 2011, NATURE, V479, P534, DOI 10.1038/nature10531
- Braak H, 2003, NEUROBIOL AGING, V24, P197, DOI 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9
- BRAAK H, 1991, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V82, P239, DOI 10.1007/BF00308809
- Bushman DM, 2015, ELIFE, V4, DOI 10.7554/eLife.05116
- Bushman DM, 2013, SEMIN CELL DEV BIOL, V24, P357, DOI 10.1016/j.semcdb.2013.02.003
- Cai XY, 2015, CELL REP, V10, P645, DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.028
- Evrony GD, 2012, CELL, V151, P483, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.035
- Faggioli F, 2011, MECH AGEING DEV, V132, P429, DOI 10.1016/j.mad.2011.04.008
- Feuk L, 2006, NAT REV GENET, V7, P85, DOI 10.1038/nrg1767
- Grinberg Lea Tenenholz, 2007, Cell and Tissue Banking, V8, P151, DOI 10.1007/s10561-006-9022-z
- JORM AF, 1989, PSYCHOL MED, V19, P1015, DOI 10.1017/S0033291700005742
- KATZ S, 1963, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V185, P914, DOI 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
- LAWTON MP, 1969, GERONTOLOGIST, V9, P179, DOI 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
- Lodato MA, 2015, SCIENCE, V350, P94, DOI 10.1126/science.aab1785
- Mackenzie IRA, 2010, ACTA NEUROPATHOL, V119, P1, DOI 10.1007/s00401-009-0612-2
- McConnell MJ, 2017, SCIENCE, V356, DOI 10.1126/science.aal1641
- McConnell MJ, 2013, SCIENCE, V342, P632, DOI 10.1126/science.1243472
- MIRRA SS, 1991, NEUROLOGY, V41, P479, DOI 10.1212/WNL.41.4.479
- MORRIS JC, 1993, NEUROLOGY, V43, P2412, DOI 10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
- Pack SD, 2005, CELL CYCLE, V4, P1758, DOI 10.4161/cc.4.12.2153
- Reinvang I, 2010, FRONT AGING NEUROSCI, V2, DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00143
- Suberbielle E, 2013, NAT NEUROSCI, V16, P613, DOI 10.1038/nn.3356
- Suemoto CK, 2017, PLOS MED, V14, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002267
- Valdes AM, 2013, NAT REV GENET, V14, P601, DOI 10.1038/nrg3553
- Krepischi AC, 2010, EPILEPSIA, V51, P2457, DOI 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02742.x
- Westra JW, 2010, J COMP NEUROL, V518, P3981, DOI 10.1002/cne.22436
- Yurov YB, 2007, PLOS ONE, V2, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000558
- Zoghbi HY, 2010, NEURON, V68, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.015