Are there differences in the growth adaptation processes of growing and mature organism models of short bowel syndrome?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2018
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
Citação
CLINICS, v.73, article ID UNSP e499, 7p, 2018
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to present an experimental model of short bowel syndrome (SBS) in weaning rats and to compare the adaptative mechanisms of the remaining bowel in weaning rats and adult animals by means of morphometric, histologic and molecular methods. METHODS: Twenty-four weaning rats were divided into 3 groups of 8 animals, one control group and two short bowel groups (euthanasia after 4 and 21 days), and were compared with similar adult groups. Morphometric evaluations of the animals and histopathological and molecular studies of the remaining bowel were performed. RESULTS: The weight of young rats increased after enterectomy, whereas that of adult rats decreased after enterectomy (p < 0.0001). The ratio of intestinal length/body weight was significantly higher in weaning rats than in adults (p < 0.002), showing that intestinal growth was more intense in weaning rats. Intestinal resection promoted increased thickness of the small bowel lamina propria (p=0.001) and reduced thickness of the colon lamina propria (p=0.04) in weaning rats relative to those in adults. In addition, intestinal resection promoted increased expression of the Bcl-xl gene (antiapoptotic) in adult animals compared with that in weaning rats (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Morphometric, histological and molecular differences were shown in the adaptation processes of growing and mature organisms.
Palavras-chave
Short Bowel Syndrome, Ileocecal Resection, Intestinal Adaptation, Weanling Rats, Animal Model
Referências
  1. Bilecik T, 2016, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V20, P520
  2. Coelho MCM, 2007, J PEDIATR SURG, V42, P613, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.011
  3. Dore M, 2017, EUR J PEDIATR SURG, V27, P116, DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1597812
  4. Goncalves JO, 2014, BRAZ J MED BIOL RES, V47, P850, DOI 10.1590/1414-431X20143679
  5. Hollwarth ME, 2017, PEDIATR SURG INT, V33, P413, DOI 10.1007/s00383-016-4043-6
  6. Ladd AP, 1998, J PEDIATR SURG, V33, P967, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90516-4
  7. Longshore S W, 2009, Minerva Pediatr, V61, P239
  8. McDonnell TJ, 1996, EXPERIENTIA, V52, P1008, DOI 10.1007/BF01920110
  9. McDuffie LA, 2011, J PEDIATR SURG, V46, P1045, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.03.027
  10. Roulis M, 2016, DIFFERENTIATION, V92, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.diff.2016.05.002
  11. Rubin DC, 2016, BEST PRACT RES CL GA, V30, P237, DOI 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.03.007
  12. Sangild PT, 2014, AM J PHYSIOL-GASTR L, V307, pG1147, DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00088.2014
  13. Stanger JD, 2013, J PEDIATR SURG, V48, P983, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.070
  14. Sundaram A, 2002, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V34, P207, DOI 10.1097/00004836-200203000-00003
  15. Tang YH, 2006, AM J PHYSIOL-GASTR L, V290, pG1280, DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00426.2005
  16. Tannuri ACA, 2012, J PEDIATR SURG, V47, P513, DOI 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.009
  17. Tannuri U, 2008, PEDIATR TRANSPLANT, V12, P73, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2007.00801.x
  18. Tannuri U, 2016, REV ASSOC MED BRAS, V62, P575, DOI 10.1590/1806-9282.62.06.575
  19. Vanderhoof JA, 2003, BEST PRACT RES CL GA, V17, P997, DOI [10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00082-9, 10.1053/ybega.2003.418]
  20. VANDERHOOF JA, 1983, J PEDIATR GASTR NUTR, V2, P672, DOI 10.1097/00005176-198311000-00018
  21. Wang WS, 2013, J PEDIATR GASTR NUTR, V57, P562, DOI 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31829f1336
  22. Welters CFM, 2001, J PEDIATR SURG, V36, P1746, DOI 10.1053/jpsu.2001.28813
  23. Yang Q, 2010, J PEDIATR GASTR NUTR, V50, P16, DOI 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181c2c2af