Surgical treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence in adult men: Report from the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
40
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
WILEY
Autores
AVERBECK, Marcio A.
WOODHOUSE, Christopher
COMITER, Craig
HANUS, Thomas
HERSCHORN, Sender
GOLDMAN, Howard B.
Citação
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, v.38, n.1, p.398-406, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Aims To report the recommendations of the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI) on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. Methods The 6th ICI committee on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence in men assessed and reviewed the outcomes of surgical therapy and updated the prior recommendations published in 2013. Articles from peer-reviewed journals, abstracts from scientific meetings, and literature searches by hand and electronically formed the basis of this review. The resulting guidelines were presented at the 2016 ICI meeting in Tokyo, Japan. Results Voiding diary and pad tests are valuable for assessing quantity of leakage. Cystoscopy and/or urodynamics may be useful in guiding therapy depending on the type of incontinence and presumed etiology. Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) is the preferred treatment for men with moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after RP. Male slings are an acceptable approach for men with mild to moderate SUI. Much discussion centers on the definition of moderate SUI. Injectable agents have a poor success rate in men with SUI. Options for recurrent SUI due to urethral atrophy after AUS implantation include changing the pressure balloon, downsizing the cuff and increasing the amount of fluid in the system. Infection and/or erosion demand surgical removal or revision of all or part of the prosthesis. Conclusions Although there are several series reporting the outcomes of different surgical interventions for PPUI, there is still a need for prospective randomized clinical trials. Recommendations for future research include standardized workup and outcome measures, and complete reporting of adverse events at long-term.
Palavras-chave
artificial sphincter, male, male sling, urinary stress incontinence
Referências
  1. Ajay D, 2015, J UROLOGY, V194, P1038, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.106
  2. Bartoletti R, 2000, UROL INT, V64, P167, DOI 10.1159/000030521
  3. Bell BB, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P85, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67978-5
  4. Bryan DE, 2002, J UROLOGY, V168, P2464, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000036436.69699.19
  5. BUMP RC, 1995, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V173, P551, DOI 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90281-3
  6. Coakley FV, 2002, J UROLOGY, V168, P1032, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000025881.75827.a5
  7. Comiter CV, 2003, UROLOGY, V62, P75, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00123-7
  8. Cornu JN, 2009, EUR UROL, V56, P923, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.015
  9. DECTER RM, 1992, J UROLOGY, V148, P588, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36661-2
  10. Dikranian AH, 2004, J UROLOGY, V172, P608, DOI 10.1097/01.ju.0000132835.48647.23
  11. Ficazzola MA, 1998, J UROLOGY, V160, P1317, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62525-4
  12. Goldman HB, 2017, INCONTINENCE
  13. Goode PS, 2000, INT UROGYNECOL J PEL, V11, P296, DOI 10.1007/s001920070020
  14. Gousse AE, 2001, J UROLOGY, V166, P1755, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65668-6
  15. GRIFFITHS DJ, 1993, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V12, P1, DOI 10.1002/nau.1930120102
  16. Groutz A, 2000, J UROLOGY, V163, P1767, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67538-6
  17. Guralnick ML, 2002, J UROLOGY, V167, P2075, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65088-4
  18. Heesakkers J, 2017, EUR UROL, V71, P936, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.031
  19. Herschorn S, 2013, SURG TREATMENT URINA
  20. Hubner WA, 2007, EUR UROL, V52, P680, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.054
  21. Husch T, 2017, UROLOGY, V103, P179, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.056
  22. Kabalin JN, 1996, J UROLOGY, V156, P1302, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65574-5
  23. Karantanis E, 2004, INT UROGYNECOL J, V15, P111, DOI 10.1007/s00192-004-1123-2
  24. Kielb SJ, 2005, UROLOGY, V66, P392, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2005.03.026
  25. Kim PH, 2013, J UROLOGY, V189, P602, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.246
  26. Kumar A, 2009, J UROLOGY, V181, P1231, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.022
  27. Lai HH, 2009, UROLOGY, V73, P1264, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.037
  28. Linder BJ, 2016, J UROLOGY, V195, P1523, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.084
  29. Lucas MG, 2013, ACTAS UROL ESP, V37, P459, DOI 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.02.002
  30. Managing acute and chronic urinary incontinence, 1996, J AM ACAD NURSE PRAC, V8, P390
  31. Martinez EJ, 2015, UROLOGY, V85, P478, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.016
  32. MCGUIRE EJ, 1993, J UROLOGY, V150, P1452, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35806-8
  33. Migliari R, 2006, J UROLOGY, V176, P2114, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.027
  34. MOTLEY RC, 1990, UROLOGY, V35, P215, DOI 10.1016/0090-4295(90)80034-K
  35. O'connor RC, 2008, UROLOGY, V71, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.017
  36. O'Connor RC, 2003, UROLOGY, V62, P723, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00572-7
  37. Pedriali FR, 2016, NEUROUROL URODYNAM, V35, P615, DOI 10.1002/nau.22761
  38. Porena M, 2007, EUR UROL, V52, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.051
  39. Rehder P, 2007, EUR UROL, V52, P860, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.110
  40. Ribeiro LHS, 2010, J UROLOGY, V184, P1034, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.040
  41. Richter S, 1999, HAREFUAH, V137, P93
  42. Rozanski AT, 2014, J UROLOGY, V192, P442, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2014.02.007
  43. SCHICK E, 1985, UROLOGY, V26, P518, DOI 10.1016/0090-4295(85)90173-6
  44. Schneider T, 2005, WORLD J UROL, V23, P338, DOI 10.1007/s00345-005-0010-x
  45. Smith AL, 2011, UROLOGY, V77, P1188, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.478
  46. STARER P, 1988, ARCH GERONTOL GERIAT, V7, P75, DOI 10.1016/0167-4943(88)90022-2
  47. Strasser H, 1998, J UROLOGY, V159, P100, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64025-4
  48. Wolin KY, 2010, J UROLOGY, V183, P629, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2009.09.082
  49. Yiou R, 2015, WORLD J UROL, V33, P1331, DOI 10.1007/s00345-014-1447-6