Cut-off values of the Johnsen score and Copenhagen index as histopathological prognostic factors for postoperative semen quality in selected infertile patients undergoing microsurgical correction of bilateral subclinical varicocele

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
17
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
AME PUBL CO
Citação
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, v.8, n.4, p.346-355, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: It remains challenging to determine which individuals are likely to benefit from microsurgical correction of subclinical varicocele, as basic semen parameters often do not improve postoperatively. We aimed to develop an easily accessible tool for prognostic stratification of infertile men indicated for microsurgical correction of bilateral subclinical varicocele characterized by prolonged and clear venous reflux and no other cause for infertility. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the testicular biopsy, seminal analysis, and ultrasound evaluation records of 20 men managed between 2006 and 2014. Subclinical varicocele was diagnosed through bilateral testicular palpation and auscultation of venous reflux using a Doppler stethoscope, with confirmation on color Doppler sonography. We conducted receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify the optimal combinations of cut-offs for the Johnsen score, Copenhagen index, and testicular volume defining histological patterns with positive prognostic value for improved postoperatively reproductive capacity. Results: Positive prognostic value was noted for the following combinations of parameters: (I) Johnsen score >8.2 in the left testicle and right testicular volume >12.8 mL predicted improved sperm concentration; (II) Johnsen score >8.2 and Copenhagen index digit II <2.5 bilaterally predicted improved total sperm motility; (III) Johnsen score >9.1 and Copenhagen index digit III <1.5 bilaterally predicted improved progressive sperm motility; (IV) Johnsen score >7.9 and right testicular volume >13.6 mL predicted improved sperm morphology. Conclusions: Johnsen score and Copenhagen index as histopathological prognostic factors can be easily obtained upon evaluation of testicular biopsy specimens and can be simple and reliable tool to establish a more realistic prognosis for reproductive capacity in men who undergo microsurgical correction of subclinical varicocele with no other detectable cause for infertility.
Palavras-chave
Testicular biopsy, subclinical varicocele, seminal parameters, microsurgery, male infertility
Referências
  1. Anawalt BD, 2013, J CLIN ENDOCR METAB, V98, P3532, DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-2400
  2. Athayde KS, 2007, J ANDROL, V28, P613, DOI 10.2164/jandrol.106.001966
  3. Barazani Y, 2011, FERTIL STERIL, V95, P487, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.058
  4. Bryniarski P, 2013, CENT EUR J UROL, V66, P56, DOI 10.5173/ceju.2013.01.art18
  5. Cantoro U, 2015, UROLOGY, V85, P826, DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2015.01.015
  6. Chen SS, 2017, ANDROLOGIA, V49, P5
  7. Cito G, 2018, UROLOGIA J, V85, P60, DOI 10.1177/0391560318758940
  8. Cocuzza M, 2008, FERTIL STERIL, V90, P1103, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.1377
  9. Cocuzza M, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V93, P2396, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.088
  10. Cocuzza M, 2009, FERTIL STERIL, V91, P925, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.12.065
  11. Condorelli R, 2013, INT J ENDOCRINOL, DOI 10.1155/2013/145792
  12. DHABUWALA CB, 1989, INT J ANDROL, V12, P430, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1989.tb01333.x
  13. DUBIN L, 1970, FERTIL STERIL, V21, P606
  14. Elbendary MA, 2009, FERTIL STERIL, V92, P2050, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.069
  15. World Medical Association, 2013, JAMA, V310, P2191, DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.281053
  16. GORDON DL, 1965, FERTIL STERIL, V16, P522
  17. Hallak J, 2001, UROLOGY, V58, P446, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01224-9
  18. Hallak J, 2017, TRANSL ANDROL UROL, V6, pS509, DOI 10.21037/tau.2017.06.29
  19. Hallak J, 2016, ASIAN J ANDROL, V18, P315, DOI 10.4103/1008-682X.172645
  20. Hayden RP, 2016, UROL CLIN N AM, V43, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.01.009
  21. JOHNSEN S G, 1970, Hormones (Basel), V1, P2, DOI 10.1159/000178170
  22. Jungwirth A, 2012, EUR UROL, V62, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.048
  23. LEVIN HS, 1979, HUM PATHOL, V10, P569, DOI 10.1016/S0046-8177(79)80100-8
  24. Lupold S, 2013, EVOLUTION, V67, P3052, DOI 10.1111/evo.12132
  25. Marmar JL, 2005, HUM REPROD, V20, P2279, DOI 10.1093/humrep/dei027
  26. MARMAR JL, 1994, J UROLOGY, V152, P1127, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32521-1
  27. Masson P, 2014, UROL CLIN N AM, V41, P129, DOI 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.001
  28. McIntyre M, 2012, CURR OPIN UROL, V22, P517, DOI 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328358e191
  29. McLachlan RI, 2007, HUM REPROD, V22, P2, DOI 10.1093/humrep/del279
  30. Naughton CK, 2001, HUM REPROD UPDATE, V7, P473, DOI 10.1093/humupd/7.5.473
  31. Organization WH, 2010, WHO LAB MAN EX PROC
  32. Pasqualotto FF, 2005, J ASSIST REPROD GEN, V22, P227, DOI 10.1007/s10815-005-4926-2
  33. PINTO KJ, 1994, J UROLOGY, V152, P788, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32710-6
  34. Practice Comm Amer Soc Reprod Med, 2014, FERTIL STERIL, V102, P1556, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007
  35. Prader A, 1966, Triangle, V7, P240
  36. Schlegel PN, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P1688, DOI 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1688
  37. Seo JT, 2010, FERTIL STERIL, V93, P1907, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.118
  38. Shiraishi K, 2012, INT J UROL, V19, P538, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02982.x
  39. SILBER SJ, 1981, FERTIL STERIL, V36, P480
  40. SKAKKEBAEK NE, 1973, J REPROD FERTIL, V32, P391
  41. Sun XL, 2018, INT UROL NEPHROL, V50, P205, DOI 10.1007/s11255-017-1749-x
  42. Thoma ME, 2013, FERTIL STERIL, V99, P1324, DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037
  43. Uygur MC, 1999, J REPROD MED, V44, P445
  44. Zhu SM, 2017, MOL MED REP, V16, P5471, DOI 10.3892/mmr.2017.7253
  45. Zini A, 1997, FERTIL STERIL, V68, P671, DOI 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00311-7