Health effects of pollution on the residential population near a Brazilian airport: A perspective based on literature review

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_FAJERSZTAJN_Health_effects_of_pollution_on_the_residential_population_2019.PDF (976.62 KB)
Citações na Scopus
18
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2019
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Autores
GUIMARAES, Mariana Tavares
DUIM, Etienne
SILVA, Tarsila Guimaraes Vieira da
BRANDAO, Suzan Lucia Brancher
RIBEIRO, Ana Elisa
NAUD, Ludmila Macedo
Citação
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, v.14, article ID 100565, 11p, 2019
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction: Airport is an important source of air and noise pollution. Acute and chronic exposure to air pollution is harmful to human health with proven effects ranging from coryza, to eye irritation, and even to death. Both acute and chronic exposure to noise pollution are harmful to human health and have been related to cardiovascular diseases, hearing loss, cognitive disorders, sleep disorders, tinnitus and respiratory changes. It is plausible to consider that residing near airports increases the likelihood of developing health problems or exacerbate pre-existing conditions. In this study, we review the effects of pollution from airport activity on the health of the resident population located in the city of Guarulhos, near the International Airport of Sao Paulo. Methods: To perform this narrative review, a comprehensive search of published scientific literature on PubMed and a search in reference lists of selected papers were applied. Results: There is a widespread scarcity of international scientific literature relating to health effects of air and noise pollution on residents living near airports; none exists in Latin America. In general, airport activity is an important source of air and noise pollutants. Areas close to airports are usually more polluted. Conclusions: It is plausible to speculate that residing near airports (including Sao Paulo International Airport) increases the likelihood of developing health problems or exacerbating pre-existing conditions. Considering the volume and importance of air transport to society, it is incumbent to invest in mitigating alternatives to improve air quality and reduce noise around airports.
Palavras-chave
air pollution, noise pollution, airports, public health
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/34551
Referências
  1. [ANAC-Agencia Nacional de Aviacao Civil IEMA-Instituto de Energia e Meio Ambiente de Sao Paulo ANAC Brasilia], 2014, INV NAC EM ATM AV CI
  2. BARKER DJP, 1991, BRIT MED J, V303, P671, DOI 10.1136/bmj.303.6804.671
  3. Barrett SRH, 2012, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V46, P4275, DOI 10.1021/es203325a
  4. Barrett SRH, 2010, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V44, P7736, DOI 10.1021/es101325r
  5. Baudin C, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15081642
  6. Canfield RL, 2003, NEW ENGL J MED, V348, P1517, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa022848
  7. CETESB-Companhia Ambiental do Estado de Sao Paulo, 2016, REL QUAL AR 2016
  8. Chiodo LM, 2004, NEUROTOXICOL TERATOL, V26, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.ntt.2004.01.010
  9. Cohen BS, 2008, J OCCUP ENVIRON HYG, V5, P119, DOI 10.1080/15459620701815564
  10. Correia AW, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V347, DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5561
  11. Costa M. M. G, 2008, SITRAER, V7, P539
  12. Dimakopoulou K, 2017, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V74, P830, DOI 10.1136/oemed-2016-104180
  13. Domingo-Pueyo A, 2016, NOISE HEALTH, V18, P229, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.192479
  14. Duarte N, 2012, AEROPORTO CUMBICA PA
  15. Dzhambov AM, 2016, NOISE HEALTH, V18, P167, DOI [10.4103/1463-1741.189241, 10.4103/1463-1741.181996]
  16. Eriksson C, 2010, ENVIRON RES, V110, P764, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2010.09.001
  17. Evrard AS, 2017, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V74, P123, DOI 10.1136/oemed-2016-103648
  18. Evrard AS, 2015, NOISE HEALTH, V17, P328, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.165058
  19. Eze IC, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V121, P741, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.006
  20. Fajersztajn Laís, 2016, Estud. av., V30, P7, DOI 10.1590/S0103-40142016.00100002
  21. Fajersztajn L, 2013, NAT REV CANCER, V13, P674, DOI 10.1038/nrc3572
  22. Ferreira C. C, 2011, GUARULHOS 450 ANOS A
  23. Floud S, 2013, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V12, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-12-89
  24. Foraster M, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V121, P879, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.057
  25. Fundacao Seade-Fundacao Sistema Estadual de Analise de Dados, 2018, INF MUN PAUL
  26. Hansell AL, 2013, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V347, DOI 10.1136/bmj.f5432
  27. Haralabidis AS, 2008, EUR HEART J, V29, P658, DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn013
  28. Hardoy MC, 2005, SOC PSYCH PSYCH EPID, V40, P24, DOI 10.1007/s00127-005-0837-x
  29. Hitchings M., 2010, GLOB REFINING FUELS, V2, P31
  30. Holt JB, 2015, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V12, DOI 10.5888/pcd12.140551
  31. Hu S, 2009, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V43, P8039, DOI 10.1021/es900975f
  32. Huang D, 2015, NOISE HEALTH, V17, P93, DOI 10.4103/1463-1741.153400
  33. IARC, 2016, IARC MONOGRAPHS EVAL
  34. [IARC-International Agency for Research on Cancer IARC Lyon], 2014, MONOGRAPHS EVALUATIO
  35. Jarup L, 2008, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V116, P329, DOI 10.1289/ehp.10775
  36. Kallio P, 2014, CURR OPIN BIOTECH, V26, P50, DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.09.006
  37. Kwak KM, 2016, ANN OCCUP ENVIRON ME, V28, DOI 10.1186/s40557-016-0123-2
  38. Lee J, 2011, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V8, P3777, DOI 10.3390/ijerph8093777
  39. Lefevre M, 2017, OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V74, P612, DOI 10.1136/oemed-2016-104208
  40. Lim SS, 2012, LANCET, V380, P2224, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
  41. Lin S, 2008, INT ARCH OCC ENV HEA, V81, P797, DOI 10.1007/s00420-007-0265-1
  42. Mazaheri M, 2011, ATMOS ENVIRON, V45, P3500, DOI 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.12.012
  43. Miranda ML, 2007, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V115, P1242, DOI 10.1289/ehp.9994
  44. Miranda ML, 2011, ENVIRON HEALTH PERSP, V119, P1513, DOI 10.1289/ehp.1003231
  45. Nykiel T. P, 2009, ANALISE IMPACTO RUID
  46. Pearson T, 2016, SPAT SPATIO-TEMPORAL, V18, P38, DOI 10.1016/j.sste.2016.03.004
  47. Penn SL, 2017, ENVIRON RES, V156, P791, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2017.04.031
  48. Psanis C, 2017, SCI TOTAL ENVIRON, V596, P187, DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.078
  49. Recio A, 2016, ENVIRON RES, V146, P359, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.036
  50. Rocco Junior J, 2008, EFEITOS POLUICAO ATM
  51. Scatolini F, 2016, REV SAUDE PUBL, V50, DOI [10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006431, 10.1590/s1518-8787.2016050006431]
  52. Schlenker W, 2016, REV ECON STUD, V83, P768, DOI 10.1093/restud/rdv043
  53. Schmidt F, 2015, CLIN RES CARDIOL, V104, P23, DOI 10.1007/s00392-014-0751-x
  54. Seabi J, 2015, J EXPO SCI ENV EPID, V25, P84, DOI 10.1038/jes.2013.71
  55. Stieb DM, 2012, ENVIRON RES, V117, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2012.05.007
  56. The World Bank, 2012, AIR TRANSP EN EFF
  57. Thiesse L, 2018, ENVIRON INT, V121, P1011, DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2018.05.036
  58. Thurston GD, 2017, EUR RESPIR J, V49, DOI 10.1183/13993003.00419-2016
  59. Veras MM, 2017, CELL TISSUE RES, V367, P445, DOI 10.1007/s00441-016-2509-4
  60. Veras MM, 2009, ENVIRON RES, V109, P536, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2009.03.006
  61. Visser O, 2005, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V5, DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-5-127
  62. WHO, 2006, AIR QUALITY GUIDELIN
  63. WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2011, BURDEN OF DISEASE FR
  64. Wolfe PJ, 2014, TRANSPORT POLICY, V34, P102, DOI 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.023
  65. Zhou Y, 2009, ENVIRON HEALTH-GLOB, V8, DOI 10.1186/1476-069X-8-22
  66. Zhu YY, 2017, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V186, P334, DOI 10.1093/aje/kwx097

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MPT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICESP
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/InCor
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/05
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03
Carregar mais