Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Use for Maxillary Reconstruction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_ALONSO_Human_Bone_Morphogenetic_Protein_2_Use_for_Maxillary_2012_eng.pdf (512 KB)
Citações na Scopus
57
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2012
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Autores
CANAN JR., Lady Wilson
FREITAS, Renato da Silva
COELHO, Julio Cezar Uili
Citação
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, v.23, n.6, p.1627-1633, 2012
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: The conventional methods of maxillary alveolar reconstruction in patient with cleft are the periosteoplasty and autologous bone grafting. As an important alternative of bone substitution, there is the recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). This study compares the rhBMP-2 with periosteoplasty and autologous bone grafting. Methods: Patients with cleft and alveolar defect were divided into 3 groups of 6 patients who underwent to autologous iliac crest bone grafting, resorbable collagen sponge with rhBMP2, and periosteoplasty, respectively. The analysis was performed through computed tomographic scan preoperatively and at months 3, 6, and 12 postoperatively. The variables analyzed were the alveolar defect volume, formed bone volume, bone formation rate, maxillary height repair rate, and the formed bone density mean. Results: The formed bone volume was similar comparing the bone graft and BMP groups at 1-year postoperative analysis (P = 0.58). Both of them had the formed bone volume significantly larger than the periosteoplasty group at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. In this last group, the 1-year follow-up was canceled because the bone formation was insufficient. The bone formation rate, the maxillary height repair rate, and the mean of density of the formed bone were similar in the bone graft and BMP groups at 1-year follow-up with P values of 0.93, 0.90, and 0.81, respectively. Conclusions: The amount of formed bone in the periosteoplasty group was insufficient. There was no difference among the bone graft and rhBMP-2 therapy considering the parameters analyzed.
Palavras-chave
Bone morphogenetic protein, cleft lip and palate, alveolar bone grafting
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/354
Referências
  1. Aamodt A, 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG BR, V81B, P143, DOI 10.1302/0301-620X.81B1.8880
  2. ABYHOLM FE, 1981, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V15, P15
  3. Alonso N, 2010, TISSUE ENG PART C-ME, V16, P1183, DOI 10.1089/ten.TEC.2009.0824
  4. Boyne P J, 1997, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, V17, P11
  5. BOYNE PJ, 1972, J ORAL SURG, V30, P87
  6. Boyne PJ, 1998, BRIT J ORAL MAX SURG, V36, P84, DOI 10.1016/S0266-4356(98)90173-5
  7. BOYNE PJ, 1974, J DENT RES, V53, P821, DOI 10.1177/00220345740530040901
  8. Carstens MH, 2005, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V16, P1023, DOI 10.1097/01.scs.0000186310.10957.2b
  9. Chin M, 2005, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V16, P778, DOI 10.1097/01.scs.0000166802.49021.01
  10. Cho YR, 2004, CLIN PLAST SURG, V31, P377, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2004.03.001
  11. Dickinson BP, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V121, P209, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000293870.64781.12
  12. Einhorn TA, 2003, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V85A, P82
  13. ENEMARK H, 1987, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V45, P913, DOI 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90439-3
  14. Fallucco MA, 2009, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V20, P1759, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b5d08e
  15. Feichtinger M, 2006, J CRANIO MAXILL SURG, V34, P144, DOI 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.11.005
  16. Hellquist R, 1982, Swed Dent J Suppl, V15, P79
  17. HELLQUIST R, 1983, CLEFT PALATE J, V20, P277
  18. HELLQUIST R, 1976, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V10, P197
  19. Herford AS, 2007, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V65, P2136, DOI 10.1016/j.jams.2007.06.670
  20. Honma K, 1999, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V57, P1209, DOI 10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90488-3
  21. KORTEBEIN MJ, 1991, J ORAL MAXIL SURG, V49, P493, DOI 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90172-I
  22. Matic DB, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V121, P1343, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000304604.89450.ae
  23. Matic DB, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V122, P863, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811a6d
  24. Meazzini MC, 2008, SCAND J PLAST RECONS, V42, P290, DOI 10.1080/02844310802091628
  25. Modolin M, 1996, TREATMENT OF CLEFT L, P13
  26. Oberoi S, 2009, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V46, P503, DOI 10.1597/08-153.1
  27. Pfeifer TM, 2002, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V39, P26, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(2002)039<0026:NMAGVA>2.0.CO;2
  28. Ross R B, 1987, Cleft Palate J, V24, P5
  29. Salyer KE, 2009, J CRANIOFAC SURG, V20, P1765, DOI 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b5d0af
  30. Santiago PE, 1998, CLEFT PALATE-CRAN J, V35, P77, DOI 10.1597/1545-1569(1998)035<0077:RNFABG>2.3.CO;2
  31. Sato Y, 2008, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V121, P1356, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000302461.56820.c9
  32. Schliephake H, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX SURG, V31, P469, DOI 10.1054/ijom.2002.0244
  33. SEMB G, 1988, CLEFT PALATE J, V25, P288
  34. Skoog T, 1965, Cleft Palate J, V2, P332
  35. URIST MR, 1965, SCIENCE, V150, P893, DOI 10.1126/science.150.3698.893

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/04